Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,363
- 17,119
- 2,190
Because that is their jobhow did Barr and the DOJ do a comprehensive analysis of all suspect activity and claims in six states in just a few days or weeks?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because that is their jobhow did Barr and the DOJ do a comprehensive analysis of all suspect activity and claims in six states in just a few days or weeks?
Of course he won’t debate the conspiracy kook who’s just trying to make a buck. He has nothing to gain from that debate. The whole thing is a PR stunt.
That’s how conspiracy theories work. They keep laying bread crumbs. Nothing ever satisfies them. You can keep pushing and pushing no matter what is found or not found. How far do you want to take it?Right, which can mean anything. To date implies that the investigation is ongoing and incomplete, but HOW incomplete? How did Barr and the DOJ study the mules video evidence two years ago when DeSouza is only coming out with it last month?
Because you are a wingnut looking at the situation through beer gogglesHow is it that I can find so much circumstantial evidence of fraud, tamping and mischief to knock an elephant over here in my house yet these giant government agencies find nothing?
BULLSHIT. All my metaphor said is thart Barr misled the country as AG sayinmg he and the DOJ found nothing when their investigation was not even complete! How incomplete was it when Barr made that statement? 90% finished? 50% finished? 10% finished?Yes, I’ve posted it three times now. He said the US attorneys and FBI agents were looking into complaints and information that’s come in. Your metaphor is dishonest because it is a false comparison.
You don’t prove conspiracy theorists wrong because they leave their accusations open ended. It’s the “what ifs” the “possibilities” that they play off of. They don’t meet a burden of proof for their claims. They try to make others prove them wrong. That’s the trap. It can go on forever about anythingBULLSHIT. For the good of the country he would prove DeSouza wrong to put the matter behind us if he conclusively really KNEW. But he doesn't, and won't debate because he might lose, be embarrassed, and reopen a matter that 99% of DC is trying to BURY, not to mention kick a glaring hole right in the side of the J6 committee.
You don't know that and that isn't the point. If Barr could prove DeSouza wrong, he would be a HERO to the DNC!Barr has nothing to gain
Meaningless, biased numbskull statement.by engaging with deranged conspiracy nuts
YOUR a joke, and a fucking LIAR. WHERE has it been debunked asshole? WHEN? HOW? By WHO?This movie has been debunked since it came out. It’s a joke
People like you will NEVER consider the investigation complete. Let me ask from a different perspective. Is the Russian Collusion investigation complete? I’m sure there are many on the left that don’t think it is.BULLSHIT. All my metaphor said is thart Barr misled the country as AG sayinmg he and the DOJ found nothing when their investigation was not even complete! How incomplete was it when Barr made that statement? 90% finished? 50% finished? 10% finished?
And when did Barr and the DOJ finish their investigation? Got a date? Did they examiner DESouza's findings? NO.
Everywhere except for the partisan bubble sites you obviously tune into. But I’ll happily debunk it for you. Let me ask. Do you think any proof of criminal activity is shown in this movie? If so, what?YOUR a joke, and a fucking LIAR. WHERE has it been debunked asshole? WHEN? HOW? By WHO?
Well then he should have no problem accepting his challenge to debate him…The "2000 Mules for Sister Trump" asshole?
DeSouza would be like a piece of dog shit that Barr stepped in and was trying to scrape of his shoe.
There never been an investigationPeople like you will NEVER consider the investigation complete.
They confirmed Hillary paid for the report, do you need it in braille?Is the Russian Collusion investigation complete?
Barr had US attorneys and FBI agents looking into the fraud claims. Didn’t find anythingThere never been an investigation
So?They confirmed Hillary paid for the report, do you need it in braille?
Class isn’t the word I would suggest using, try Bureaucrat….Barr is of the class that runs the country
Sure he did, what did they do, who did they really interview? Corruption in our elections has existed from the beginning, has it become better or worst?Barr had US attorneys and FBI agents looking into the fraud claims. Didn’t find anything
So a fake dossier gets a “So” from you?
Ask them. I see no reason why Barr would lie to the public about it, it would serve him no benefit and only put him at risk. But you can go investigate if you’d like.Sure he did, what did they do, who did they really interview? Corruption in our elections has existed from the beginning, has it become better or worst?
Yes it gets a so?? As in what’s your point?So a fake dossier gets a “So” from you?
Says everything about what the truth means to you…
It is substantiated. They can check it if they wish,If you’re calling on people to analyze the the “data” then it is obviously not substantiated. You contradicted yourself and exposed your lies. Thank you. That was easy
This is not a conspiracy theory. The digital evidence is there. Video evidence also.That’s how conspiracy theories work. They keep laying bread crumbs. Nothing ever satisfies them. You can keep pushing and pushing no matter what is found or not found. How far do you want to take it?