LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
You read too much into my statements, Carbine. Yours is a false dilemma argument which implies I wish for there to be a crisis. By repeatedly raising the debt ceiling, you are merely avoiding a crisis, not negating it. That within itself will create a crisis altogether on its own.
You're the one who called it a crisis. If you are willing to make raising or not raising the debt ceiling a negotiable item, then you are saying you are willing to see the debt ceiling NOT be raised if negotiations don't go in the way you want them.
That may not mean you wish for a debt ceiling crisis, but it does mean you've put it on the table as a possible outcome you're willing to accept.
I, in contrast, don't believe it should be on the table at all. Period.
I am not willing to accept any outcome which results in a crisis of any kind, Carbine. I call it a crisis merely because it is the common vernacular used in this type of debate. "Crisis" is merely an objective term. Nothing more. And now you are resorting to a circumstantial ad hominem attack to substantiate your own argument.
I invite you to re-read the above post. Then ask yourself how it can be viewed as anything other than a huge pile of bullshit. Man...you are really, really bad at this.