Deep down does it ever piss you off when morons like Ocasio win elections in either party?

[candycorn]

Yeah…the OP was schilling for a guy name Todd Akin a few years ago. To refresh the board’s memory, Todd Akin said

View attachment 237883

Goes to show that there are idiots on both sides of the aisle.

Very true. What used to happen was that you had to pay your dues and then you work your way up to be the nominee by winning your state as a governor or being in the senate forever or something. With Obama and now the blob….if you get your party’s nomination; you have a coin flip’s chance of winning the Presidency.

Will AOC run for President? Boy, I hope not. But if she’s on the ballot against Trump…who should I vote for….the blob? No way. Some 3rd party guy nobody’s ever heard of who is in favor of renaming the states or some other bizarre platform plank? No.

Whats more is that California and their massive amount of delegates are now going to be voting on Super Tuesday in March 2020. Winning big on that one day really puts you in the driver’s seat going forward. Essentially you have Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada then boom…25% of all delegates are up for grabs on one day. A popular person with some buzz can actually become the favorite very quickly.

 

[Maxdeath]

She's not really dumb, she's being attacked by rwnj media.

If you are worried about electing stupid people why don't you start with the *president*?

Not really dumb, just uneducated and a lot slow.

Does she have a lot to learn? Heck yeah.

Does that mean she's stupid? Hell no.

And as for being "slow" she's been quite enough to come out on top of all the Twitter exchanges and what-not that I've seen.

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

 

[Ambivalent1]

 

[EasyPeasy]

Sorry, I don't get pissed over elections.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We got everything we wanted

Haha....like Mexico paying for a wall? No, instead you got trump shutting down the government if taxpayers don't pay for it.

But it doesn't matter....cultists will be cultists...

 

[JWBooth]

Deep down does it ever piss you off when morons like Ocasio win elections in either party?

No, why should it? Idiocracy is the eventual result of the system imposed upon us.

 

[Soupnazi630]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

In the case of Acosta they spun her image in the media before her election.

In the after math no one could stop her stupidity from being exposed on you tube,social media and anywhere else people wanted to laugh at her.

In the case of trump they went out of their way to make him look as bad as possible but it backfired on them

 

[Crepitus]

She's not really dumb, she's being attacked by rwnj media.

If you are worried about electing stupid people why don't you start with the *president*?

Not really dumb, just uneducated and a lot slow.

Does she have a lot to learn? Heck yeah.

Does that mean she's stupid? Hell no.

And as for being "slow" she's been quite enough to come out on top of all the Twitter exchanges and what-not that I've seen.

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

Seriously? You are seriously suggesting somebody else is writing her tweets?

Time to lay off the koolaide kid, you've OD'd.

 

[Richard-H]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Ocasio represents the political sentiments of a very, very large percentage of the American people. These people are grossly under represented in our "democracy". Their political opinions have been systematically squelched by the power elite for many many years.

Meanwhile, we have a President and Senate that represents the political sentiments of at most 20% of Americans. Yet that 20% have more than 50% of the political power.

Something is very wrong with our "Democracy" and has been for many, many years.

You could say that we are a "Republic", but a Republic is a representative democracy - so we're not much of a "Republic" either.

 

[busybee01]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Trump is the dumbest President we have ever had. Trump supporters have no room to call anyone else stupid.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Not really dumb, just uneducated and a lot slow.

Does she have a lot to learn? Heck yeah.

Does that mean she's stupid? Hell no.

And as for being "slow" she's been quite enough to come out on top of all the Twitter exchanges and what-not that I've seen.

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

Seriously? You are seriously suggesting somebody else is writing her tweets?

Time to lay off the koolaide kid, you've OD'd.

Dumb as she has been proven to be there is no doubt she writes them

She was recently burned and humiliated in a Twitter exchange where we was exposed as the foolish liar she is

 

[Soupnazi630]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Ocasio represents the political sentiments of a very, very large percentage of the American people. These people are grossly under represented in our "democracy". Their political opinions have been systematically squelched by the power elite for many many years.

Meanwhile, we have a President and Senate that represents the political sentiments of at most 20% of Americans. Yet that 20% have more than 50% of the political power.

Something is very wrong with our "Democracy" and has been for many, many years.

You could say that we are a "Republic", but a Republic is a representative democracy - so we're not much of a "Republic" either.

Citations needed especially for claiming a large percentage agree with her.

 

[Soupnazi630]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Ocasio represents the political sentiments of a very, very large percentage of the American people. These people are grossly under represented in our "democracy". Their political opinions have been systematically squelched by the power elite for many many years.

Meanwhile, we have a President and Senate that represents the political sentiments of at most 20% of Americans. Yet that 20% have more than 50% of the political power.

Something is very wrong with our "Democracy" and has been for many, many years.

You could say that we are a "Republic", but a Republic is a representative democracy - so we're not much of a "Republic" either.

Citations needed especially for claiming a large percentage agree with her.

To be fair the op indirectly.mentioned trump as well comparing his election to Acosta.

One can not be a trump supporter and recognize the even greater idiocy of leftists like the privileged liar Acosta

 

[Richard-H]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Ocasio represents the political sentiments of a very, very large percentage of the American people. These people are grossly under represented in our "democracy". Their political opinions have been systematically squelched by the power elite for many many years.

Meanwhile, we have a President and Senate that represents the political sentiments of at most 20% of Americans. Yet that 20% have more than 50% of the political power.

Something is very wrong with our "Democracy" and has been for many, many years.

You could say that we are a "Republic", but a Republic is a representative democracy - so we're not much of a "Republic" either.

Citations needed especially for claiming a large percentage agree with her.

35% of ALL Americans as opposed to Trump's 34% support of the VOTING public

Americans' Views of Socialism, Capitalism Are Little Changed

 

[Soupnazi630]

She may be dumber than the Guam tip over nut (forget his name). Both parties seem hell bent on electing nuts and it just boggles my mind. How does someone SO VERIFIABLY STUPID win an election? What does that say about us? As a collective we nominated the two most hated people in the country to run our nation. Basically we decided to play Russian Roulette with a damn bullet in every chamber.

WHY???

Ocasio represents the political sentiments of a very, very large percentage of the American people. These people are grossly under represented in our "democracy". Their political opinions have been systematically squelched by the power elite for many many years.

Meanwhile, we have a President and Senate that represents the political sentiments of at most 20% of Americans. Yet that 20% have more than 50% of the political power.

Something is very wrong with our "Democracy" and has been for many, many years.

You could say that we are a "Republic", but a Republic is a representative democracy - so we're not much of a "Republic" either.

Citations needed especially for claiming a large percentage agree with her.

35% of ALL Americans as opposed to Trump's 34% support of the VOTING public

Americans' Views of Socialism, Capitalism Are Little Changed

Not very good.

35% with a " positive view " of socialism leaves a hell of a lot of ambiguity and does not translate well into support for the retard

34 % of the voting population leaves out the non voting population which is much larger and relatively unknown.

Either way she is a total fool and liar and socialism is a failure.

 

[Maxdeath]

Not really dumb, just uneducated and a lot slow.

Does she have a lot to learn? Heck yeah.

Does that mean she's stupid? Hell no.

And as for being "slow" she's been quite enough to come out on top of all the Twitter exchanges and what-not that I've seen.

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

Seriously? You are seriously suggesting somebody else is writing her tweets?

Time to lay off the koolaide kid, you've OD'd.

Little boy do you actually think that someone did not write everything 44 read? Do you seriously believe that she can say the things that she has said then turn around and be smart enough to write the comebacks that have come from that account? Prove me wrong. Funny how reasoning skills are seldom used.

 

[Crepitus]

Does she have a lot to learn? Heck yeah.

Does that mean she's stupid? Hell no.

And as for being "slow" she's been quite enough to come out on top of all the Twitter exchanges and what-not that I've seen.

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

Seriously? You are seriously suggesting somebody else is writing her tweets?

Time to lay off the koolaide kid, you've OD'd.

Little boy do you actually think that someone did not write everything 44 read? Do you seriously believe that she can say the things that she has said then turn around and be smart enough to write the comebacks that have come from that account? Prove me wrong. Funny how reasoning skills are seldom used.

Yes, it is funny how seldom reasoning skills are used. Imagination now, especially when coming up with the next conservitard conspiracy theory, is rocking and rolling.

 

[my2¢]

The question got a "No" from me. Those who elect "morons like Ocasio" have the right to their own opinions. I'll express mine but it bothers me not if folks take it or leave it.

 

[Maxdeath]

Can you prove that someone else did not write those Twitter exchanges?

Lol what?

So what part of that sentence is giving you trouble. Do I need to use smaller words?
Let me try again. Can you prove that someone from her campaign did not use her Twitter account. There were too many smart pointed remarks and too many big words.

Seriously? You are seriously suggesting somebody else is writing her tweets?

Time to lay off the koolaide kid, you've OD'd.

Little boy do you actually think that someone did not write everything 44 read? Do you seriously believe that she can say the things that she has said then turn around and be smart enough to write the comebacks that have come from that account? Prove me wrong. Funny how reasoning skills are seldom used.

Yes, it is funny how seldom reasoning skills are used. Imagination now, especially when coming up with the next conservitard conspiracy theory, is rocking and rolling.

And still little one nothing but bull from you. Funny how that works out.

 

[tyroneweaver]

She's not really dumb, she's being attacked by rwnj media.

If you are worried about electing stupid people why don't you start with the *president*?

We like her because of the ammunition she gives us.
Ya know, sorta like a mst3k movie

Except that she's not giving you anything, you have to manufacture it.

Like getting kicked off the watergate committee