progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,309
- 38,060
wrong again,,,thats their choice,, I choose otherwise,,Where does the 2nd say guns??WRONG AGAIN!!!That's a broad-as-fuck grant of arbitrary power which is hostile to unalienable rights. You think it will stop there?You can call it whatever you want however you intend to use it.If a gun can be designated an assault rifle without knowing what the true intent of the rifle is, maybe they should be called defense assault rifles when they are intended for defense, and hunting assault rifles when they are intended for hunting. Maybe a freedom assault rifle if the intent is to simply have what the second amendment guarantees.
In the context of the law and firearm regulatory policy, lawmaking bodies have the authority to determine what is and what is not an assault rifle reflecting the will of the people.
What could POSSIBLY go wrong with that way of thinking?
The right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, not an inalienable right.
Jesus. You and rights do not belong together in the same sentence. You are a willing subject.
Inalienable rights are natural rights that people are born with. A gun is a manufactured item that has to be purchased.
You're simply declaring something as an inalienable right...just because you want it to be....doesn't make it so!
Good question. perhaps the second amendment would be satisfied as long as people were allowed to arm themselves with toothpicks.
You have the freedom to "choose otherwise" only because the U.S. Federal government - the Supreme Court - says you do!