thanatos144
Gold Member
You just said you dont have a choice and I proved you are full of shit .... Now trumper whats the next thing you will whine about like a little bitch?Sounds like you are still high from sniffing your dog's asshole. When you come down tell me how you determined your comments are related to anything I said. Thanks!go look up how many parties run for president and then please apologize to us all for your ignorance. off the top of my head there is republican, democrat, red ,Communist, green , socialist, libertarian, and several more.....you cant find a choice among those???? I know it is really because fake tans and comb overs turn you on.There is no comparison no matter how hard you massage it. Political parties not only try to influence elections, they do. They even pick our "choices" for us. I have one vote well after the fact."They aren't doing anything that you aren't doing ..."Who said "on par"? Where are those words in my post? Oh, they aren't there? Then I will assume that this is your newfound leftist debate style, which you should be SO proud of having adopted.
Let me repeat myself a little slower, since while adopting leftspeak, you apparently also reduced your IQ by 50 points to match theirs (not to mention took on their sense of shame). They are doing the same thing you are doing, ie. attempting to influence public policy. They are just spending more time, effort, and money than you are, and thus being more effective.
So OBVIOUSLY, LeftWeasel, I said EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of you being on any "par" with anyone. I said, "Same goals, different effort, different result".
The "entire election process" is not run through the parties. The party operations are run through the parties. I dunno about where you live - and clearly, YOU don't know about where you live either, if you've drunk so much Trump-Aid that you think elections are run by political parties - but where I live, the elections are run by the Arizona Secretary of State's office and the various county recorders' offices. I suspect wherever you live has similar GOVERNMENT offices that handle GOVERNMENT functions, and I'm sure they could probably run an intervention for you and explain the whole "difference between government and private organizations" thing for you.
Those are your words, not mine. I'm not on par with the political parties. They have quite a bit more influence that I do. Insulting people is all you have. Your dismissal of the importance the parties play because they are privately owned is your problem, not mine. I don't need to dismiss anything. Sure, government agencies print up the pamphlets, count the votes, etc. but it all about who the party is backing. The higher up, the more it matters.
Your hatred and intolerance for anyone that doesn't goose step behind your anti-Trump hysteria is amusing to read. Like it's going to matter!
Like I said, they're trying to influence the government and public policy, just like you are. They're doing it more effectively, and never once did I suggest that you were on any "par" with them in that regard. You're just trying to twist words and deflect, a sure sign that you know you're wrong, and you're too big a poltroon to admit it.
Clearly, insulting people is NOT all I have, since I also have an argument that you have to deliberately misconstrue in order to avoid it.
I am not "dismissing" the importance of the parties. That is ALSO your need to misconstrue my words in order to have the argument you WISH was happening, instead of the one you're too cowardly to face head-on. What I AM dismissing is your claim that there's something sinister, underhanded, Unconstitutional, etc. about it.
I never used the word unconstitutional, quit pulling shit out of your ass and blaming me for mischaracterizing the conversation.
I said it was a crooked system, if you don't agree that's your opinion. I have mine and you don't have the authority to change it.