bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,322
- 2,180
That applies in criminal trials, not in public opinion, doofus.People who commit crimes have the "right" to keep someone from exposing them, no matter which side they're on? And what about anonymous whistle blowers? Their evidence should be ignored? It's evident you take up for crooked scum.. Who cares who it was, all I can say is THANK YOU to them. Now if anything reported wasn't true, then I could see all the outrage maybe, but it's true in which is embarrassing to the Dems big time. Maybe the world couldn't stand the Clinton's either. Hmmmm.Do you think WikiLeaks would come out and say it was the Russians? Now that's some funny shit.
You don't care how evidence is gotten? Jesus, so many people on this forum that don't care about individual rights.
No. That's not it at all. It's called the fruit from a poisonous tree doctrine. Look it up.
Last edited: