Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
How the Democrat voters aren't UPSET of what that party pulled on them is astounding to me. but thankfully it may come back to hurt them

SNIP:
Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…


730x420-n_fbc6cbdbee7d0b9ca627265cf1c47504-550x316.jpg


If you play the safe game, it may turn out not to be safe. She’s feeling the Bern…

Via Washington Examiner:

On Sunday night, in the middle of this three-day weekend and shortly after the Steelers-Broncos playoff game, the three remaining Democratic candidates for president will hold another debate.

If you ask the progressive supporters of Bernie Sanders, there is a sinister reason behind the decision by Democratic Party officials to hold relatively few debates and to schedule them in out-of-the-way time slots when few Americans are likely to watch. It all seems designed to help Hillary Clinton win the nomination without too much trouble.

After all, conventional wisdom holds that underdog candidates have more to gain from debating their favored opponents, and that candidates favored to win have little incentive to give underdogs a chance by debating them.

Keep reading…

ALL OF it here:
Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring… | Weasel Zippers
 
Keep the old bitch hidden, the less I see of her and don't have to listen to that gawd awful cackle the better
 
Keep the old bitch hidden, the less I see of her and don't have to listen to that gawd awful cackle the better

oh darn. LOL
she wouldn't be anything if not for riding her hound dog Presidents coattail into office and this:
 
To me her voice sounds like the quintessential nagging housewife. I think even a lot of liberal guys cringe when they hear her "...and I'll tell you another thing!" voice.
 
Don`t say anything in front of Hillary that she might consider funny. The sound of her hideous cackle is liable to turn the closest friend of America a bitter enemy of America.
 
It turns out there will be no coronation for Hill. The strategies she held on to are not working. Chelsea has not obey orders in keeping the speeches sweet and endearing and she is putting a leash back on Bill. She did well in the former debates, but there were too few and done at a time with low viewership. Just an example of her incompetence yet again.
 
It turns out there will be no coronation for Hill. The strategies she held on to are not working. Chelsea has not obey orders in keeping the speeches sweet and endearing and she is putting a leash back on Bill. She did well in the former debates, but there were too few and done at a time with low viewership. Just an example of her incompetence yet again.

Couldn't happen to a nastier old bitch. Hopefully she'll fly off into the sunset on her broom and not bother anyone ever again
 
"Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…"

This also illustrates the considerable dissonance between democrats and republicans, and how clueless most republican are.


Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand that 'television' is the old medium, a relic of the 20th Century.

Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand a majority of Americans use the media of the 21st Century – streaming, podcasts, YouTube, and other online venues; this is particularly true of democrats who embrace and are more comfortable with the media of the 21st Century.

Therefore, democrats relegate 'television' to its proper place, one source among many, superior to none.

Consequently, the thread premise, and the premise of the linked article, fails – no one is 'hiding' anyone from anyone, nothing is 'backfiring'; democrats are at liberty to watch the debates anytime they wish, on their phones, tablets, or laptops – when the debates are scheduled for 'television' is irrelevant and meaningless, Sanders will have ample opportunity to challenge Clinton and debate the issues.

It's truly amusing, but not surprising, how out of touch most republicans are, how they perceive 'television' as the 'dominant medium,' oblivious to the fact that 'the media' exist online now, and have for quite some time.
 
"Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…"

This also illustrates the considerable dissonance between democrats and republicans, and how clueless most republican are.


Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand that 'television' is the old medium, a relic of the 20th Century.

Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand a majority of Americans use the media of the 21st Century – streaming, podcasts, YouTube, and other online venues; this is particularly true of democrats who embrace and are more comfortable with the media of the 21st Century.

Therefore, democrats relegate 'television' to its proper place, one source among many, superior to none.

Consequently, the thread premise, and the premise of the linked article, fails – no one is 'hiding' anyone from anyone, nothing is 'backfiring'; democrats are at liberty to watch the debates anytime they wish, on their phones, tablets, or laptops – when the debates are scheduled for 'television' is irrelevant and meaningless, Sanders will have ample opportunity to challenge Clinton and debate the issues.

It's truly amusing, but not surprising, how out of touch most republicans are, how they perceive 'television' as the 'dominant medium,' oblivious to the fact that 'the media' exist online now, and have for quite some time.
How many viewers did the Fox debate have? I forget.
 
"Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…"

This also illustrates the considerable dissonance between democrats and republicans, and how clueless most republican are.


Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand that 'television' is the old medium, a relic of the 20th Century.

Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand a majority of Americans use the media of the 21st Century – streaming, podcasts, YouTube, and other online venues; this is particularly true of democrats who embrace and are more comfortable with the media of the 21st Century.

Therefore, democrats relegate 'television' to its proper place, one source among many, superior to none.

Consequently, the thread premise, and the premise of the linked article, fails – no one is 'hiding' anyone from anyone, nothing is 'backfiring'; democrats are at liberty to watch the debates anytime they wish, on their phones, tablets, or laptops – when the debates are scheduled for 'television' is irrelevant and meaningless, Sanders will have ample opportunity to challenge Clinton and debate the issues.

It's truly amusing, but not surprising, how out of touch most republicans are, how they perceive 'television' as the 'dominant medium,' oblivious to the fact that 'the media' exist online now, and have for quite some time.
How many viewers did the Fox debate have? I forget.

Don't expect an answer, that one spews and scampers off
 
"Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…"

This also illustrates the considerable dissonance between democrats and republicans, and how clueless most republican are.


Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand that 'television' is the old medium, a relic of the 20th Century.

Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand a majority of Americans use the media of the 21st Century – streaming, podcasts, YouTube, and other online venues; this is particularly true of democrats who embrace and are more comfortable with the media of the 21st Century.

Therefore, democrats relegate 'television' to its proper place, one source among many, superior to none.

Consequently, the thread premise, and the premise of the linked article, fails – no one is 'hiding' anyone from anyone, nothing is 'backfiring'; democrats are at liberty to watch the debates anytime they wish, on their phones, tablets, or laptops – when the debates are scheduled for 'television' is irrelevant and meaningless, Sanders will have ample opportunity to challenge Clinton and debate the issues.

It's truly amusing, but not surprising, how out of touch most republicans are, how they perceive 'television' as the 'dominant medium,' oblivious to the fact that 'the media' exist online now, and have for quite some time.
LOL. Nice try.
 
"Democrat Plan To Hide Hillary From Debates Backfiring…"

This also illustrates the considerable dissonance between democrats and republicans, and how clueless most republican are.


Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand that 'television' is the old medium, a relic of the 20th Century.

Unlike republicans, democrats correctly understand a majority of Americans use the media of the 21st Century – streaming, podcasts, YouTube, and other online venues; this is particularly true of democrats who embrace and are more comfortable with the media of the 21st Century.

Therefore, democrats relegate 'television' to its proper place, one source among many, superior to none.

Consequently, the thread premise, and the premise of the linked article, fails – no one is 'hiding' anyone from anyone, nothing is 'backfiring'; democrats are at liberty to watch the debates anytime they wish, on their phones, tablets, or laptops – when the debates are scheduled for 'television' is irrelevant and meaningless, Sanders will have ample opportunity to challenge Clinton and debate the issues.

It's truly amusing, but not surprising, how out of touch most republicans are, how they perceive 'television' as the 'dominant medium,' oblivious to the fact that 'the media' exist online now, and have for quite some time.
LOL. Nice try.
I didn't really see it as a nice try. lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top