Democrat Prosecutor: Trump Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Himself

[Weatherman2020]

You fascist teabaggers denied Asa Hutchinson his right to debate, then whine about the orange traitor?

Who said Trump couldn't defend himself?

Oh wow. I was denied to go on stage and debate them too.

Where’s that in the US Constitution?

Dumbass fascist.

 

[JoeB131]

Unless it’s illegally obtained guns by a Democrat, then it’s no big deal.

Gun possession is rarely prosecuted, because law enforcement has better things to do.

Instead of requiring Hunter and guys like him to swear they don't have a drug problem, make them piss in a bottle.

You guys have spent the last 50 years weakening background checks, and now you are whining someone you don't like got a gun (that he didn't use to commit a crime) when he shouldn't have.

Irrelevant lie.
A person has the right to defend themselves as they see fit and offer testimony as they see fit, fascist traitor.

Um, no, you are only allowed to introduce RELEVANT evidence, not just throw everything against the wall and see what sticks.

The problem Trump has is that he's obviously guilty.

 

[westwall]

Gun possession is rarely prosecuted, because law enforcement has better things to do.

Instead of requiring Hunter and guys like him to swear they don't have a drug problem, make them piss in a bottle.

You guys have spent the last 50 years weakening background checks, and now you are whining someone you don't like got a gun (that he didn't use to commit a crime) when he shouldn't have.



Um, no, you are only allowed to introduce RELEVANT evidence, not just throw everything against the wall and see what sticks.

The problem Trump has is that he's obviously guilty.

Correct. Fascist prosecutors keep letting violent criminals out to commit their crimes so they can push for more gun control.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Except his VP whose only duty is to count the votes. Illegal and unconstitutional.

Actually, at that time Pence was not required to certify the election (I assume that's what you meant), if he did not believe the results were valid. There certainly was no criminal statute he would have violated if he had done what Trump asked. So . . . no crime that Trump was supposedly telling him to commit.

That last part is what is lost on Democrats, deliberately obtuse, or really that out of touch may they be. For something to be a "crime," it must be a concrete action that violates a criminal statute. There was no criminal statute that would have applied to Mike Pence if he had done exactly what Trump asked him to do. Therefore . . . no crime to ask him to do it.

“I think it’s important that the American people know what happened in the days before January 6,” Pence said. “President Trump demanded that I use my authority as vice president presiding over the count of the Electoral College to essentially overturn the election by returning or literally rejecting votes. I had no authority to do that.”

That's his interpretation of the requirements. Lamakers disagreed and passed a law that did say that the VP has only ceremonial duties in certifying the election.

On Jan. 6, Trump targeted Congress’ ratification of the Electoral College’s vote. He tried to exploit the vice president’s role in reading out the states’ electors to get Mike Pence to block Biden from becoming the next president by omitting some states Biden won from the roll. The new provisions make clear that the vice president’s responsibilities in the process are merely ceremonial and that the vice president has no say in determining who actually won the election.

Congress approves new election certification rules in response to Jan. 6.

 

[JoeB131]

Correct. Fascist prosecutors keep letting violent criminals out to commit their crimes so they can push for more gun control.

We lock up 2 million people in this country. More than Communist China with five times as many people and being fucking Communists.

Locking people up isn't the problem. It also isn't a solution.

 

[SeaMajor7]

We lock up 2 million people in this country. More than Communist China with five times as many people and being fucking Communists.

Locking people up isn't the problem. It also isn't a solution.

Fuck around and find out!
Criminal LAW is LAW!!!

 

[westwall]

We lock up 2 million people in this country. More than Communist China with five times as many people and being fucking Communists.

Locking people up isn't the problem. It also isn't a solution.

China kills way more. You ignore that fact

 

[JoeB131]

China kills way more. You ignore that fact

Because it's not relevant. China maybe executes 5000 people a year out of a population of 1.5 BILLION.

Capital Punishment isn't a deterrent. Never was, never will be.

What China doesn't do is have prisons for profit like we do in this country. If someone is in jail in China, he probably deserves to be there.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Oh wow. I was denied to go on stage and debate them too.

They don't need another Trump asslicker.
They have plenty.

Where’s that in the US Constitution?

Where is campaigning and debating in the US constitution?

Dumbass fascist.

Dumbass fascist, teabagger.

 

[Hollie]

We lock up 2 million people in this country. More than Communist China with five times as many people and being fucking Communists.

Locking people up isn't the problem. It also isn't a solution.

Right. Locking up criminals will definitely hurt their feelings.

NYC Man Who Allegedly Stabbed Teens Was Released Weeks Before

A man accused of stabbing two teenagers at New York City's Grand Central Terminal on Christmas Day was freed by a judge just weeks prior.

www.breitbart.com

“A man accused of stabbing two teenagers at New York City’s Grand Central Terminal on Christmas Day was freed by a judge just weeks prior after a string of violence, and he now allegedly has stabbed a fellow prisoner at Rikers Island.

The man allegedly shouted racist remarks as well. Law enforcement sources told the New York Post at the time that the man yelled, “I want all the white people dead,” and “I want to sit next to the crackers.”

 

[westwall]

Because it's not relevant. China maybe executes 5000 people a year out of a population of 1.5 BILLION.

Capital Punishment isn't a deterrent. Never was, never will be.

What China doesn't do is have prisons for profit like we do in this country. If someone is in jail in China, he probably deserves to be there.

Yes, China kills more than the rest of the world combined.

You think that might have an effect on crime? Once they are dead it's pretty hard to commit another crime..no?

 

[berg80]

Smith's filing is a routine matter of alerting the court to preventing the defendant from introducing matters extraneous to the matter at hand. Trump's guilt or innocence based on the facts to be presented in the case.

Trump knows the facts and the law are not on his side. So he will try to put the entire justice system on trial. Claiming it is biased against him despite him being given deference from day 1.

 

[kyzr]

Smith's filing is a routine matter of alerting the court to preventing the defendant from introducing matters extraneous to the matter at hand. Trump's guilt or innocence based on the facts to be presented in the case.

Trump knows the facts and the law are not on his side. So he will try to put the entire justice system on trial. Claiming it is biased against him despite him being given deference from day 1.

The facts and the law are not on the illegally appointed prosecutor's side.

 

[berg80]

The facts and the law are not on the illegally appointed prosecutor's side.

Bullshit like claiming Smith was appointed illegally is just the kind of thing Smith is trying to prevent Trump from doing.

 

[kyzr]

Bullshit like claiming Smith was appointed illegally is just the kind of thing Smith is trying to prevent Trump from doing.

Taylor Swift has more legal authority!!

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Taylor Swift has more legal authority!!

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

Special Counsel John Durham​

Department of Justice (.gov)
https://www.justice.gov › sco-durham
About. On October 19, 2020, John Durham was appointed by Attorney General William Barr to serve as the Special Counsel by the order ...

DUMBASS.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes, China kills more than the rest of the world combined.

You think that might have an effect on crime? Once they are dead it's pretty hard to commit another crime..no?

Once they are in jail, it's hard to commit another crime.

China executes people for crimes like drug possession. They also have a fuzzy view on civil rights.

 

[BS Filter]

Typical of the orange liar, blame everyone but himself.
Trump has done that his entire life.

Trump was never a criminal until he defeated Hillary. Democrats will never get over it.

 

[struth]

I would let Trump say whatever he wants.
When he can't prove shit, as usual, he gets a perjury charge for each statement.

Nothing But the Truth: What Happens When You Lie Under ...​

View attachment 879748
FindLaw
https://www.findlaw.com › ... › Criminal Charges
Sep 8, 2023 — The penalty for a federal perjury crime includes fines and imprisonment for up to five years. Judges have the discretion to use leniency ...

Hahaha trump doesn’t have to prove anything you silly demafacist

 

[berg80]

Taylor Swift has more legal authority!!

Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues

Special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, leaving him powerless to obtain a quick U.S. Supreme Court decision on immunity claims by former President Donald Trump, according to an amicus brief signed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese and two law professors.

www.abajournal.com

Again, these are exactly the kinds of lunatic, fringe opinions prosecutors regularly ask the court to prevent from being presented since they are nothing more than a smokescreen to keep the jury from focusing on the facts.