Democrat Pushover

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Listen to Bernie Goldberg fudging definitions on last night’s O’Reilly show:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjrXlH24Hg8&feature=player_embedded]Bernie on the Tea Party -- and Chris Christie - YouTube[/ame]​

First off, Chris Christie is the MEDIA frontrunner by far. Provided he does not screw up big time before 2016 the worst Christie can expect from the media between now and the primaries is a dead heat with a yet to be determined establishment Republican.

Secondly, Goldberg tortured the definition of RINO when he said Tea Partiers are the true RINO. He is wrong because a true RINO votes with the Democrats on issues important to the Democrat agenda. Bernie Goldberg failed to mention that no Tea Party conservative would ever vote for a piece of Socialist legislation.

NOTE: HillaryCare II was the one and only time a few hardcore RINO did not cross the line to support a fundamental Socialist objective.

Picking the pushover

Hillary Clinton is no lock in 2016 in spite of Goldberg practically administering the oath of office. In fact, of all of the Democrat wannabes I’m aware of she is the easiest Democrat to beat. Here’s why:

The Affordable Care Act is going to cream Democrats in the midterms. Democrats will lose the Senate as well as losing seats in the House. Republicans won’t get the two-thirds majorities needed to repeal HillaryCare II because a presidential veto is guarantied.

Come 2016 Hillary Clinton faces a bigger problem than Democrats are facing in the midterms. Private sector Democrats, along with everyone else, will be severely punished by the ACA after it is fully implemented; lost health insurance, higher costs for less coverage, HMO doctors, privacy, and so on.

Conservatives do not have to win the hearts and minds of Democrats as O’Reilly & Goldberg tried to lay on Ted Cruz. Many Democrats are going to vote against Hillary without changing their core beliefs. Why? Answer: Because they know that Hillary will veto repeal, too. She can’t even count on traditional Democrat women voting for her because every woman already knows that HillaryCare II will hurt them badly right along with hurting men. Come 2016, Democrat women with families will constitute the largest Democrat voting bloc voting against Clinton.

Super majorities in both Houses is the only way Republicans can override Hillary’s veto. Since the votes are counted after the elections voters cannot possibly know if Republicans won super majorities in 2016. They won’t take the chance. The only guarantied road to repeal is to vote against Hillary.

On top of it all, conservatives have only to hammer home the details in the original HillaryCare along with the many things Clinton said about government-imposed healthcare. Statements that put her to the Left of Taqiyya on Socialized medicine.

Conservatives do have one thing to fear. A Karl Rove Republican beating Hillary Clinton and giving the impression he won on ideology rather than won because the American people voted against HillaryCare II. Such a scenario can breathe another decade of life into the Republican party as it now operates.

Goldberg was right in that conservatives are not loyal to the Republican party. After belaboring the obvious Bernie quickly scooted back to the netherworld. Tea Partiers can hardly be called Republicans In Name Only when they are not loyal to the current Republican party. In plain English, one cannot be a RINO if one is not a Republican to begin with. Any attempt to understand Goldberg’s logic boggles the mind.

CINO (Conservative In Name Only) is a more accurate title for Tea Party double-dealers. To date none have been identified. Interestingly, RINO & CINO are interchangeable labels among Karl Rove’s Republicans.

Goldberg’s final piece of fudge is stale. No Tea Party conservative is going to buy the same old story Bernie is selling; vote for the Republican or you’ll get the Democrat. It matters not that the Democrat in 2016 will probably be the Wicked Witch of Leftism —— Hillary Clinton. Conservatives heard it all before. More to the point —— conservatives know what to expect from Republican presidents like the Tax Collector for the Welfare State Bob Dole, Amnesty for Illegals John McCain, and Romneycare Mitt Romney.

Also, Mr. Goldberg went off the deep end with his rigidity claim. Tea Partiers are no more rigid than Democrats and Karl Rove’s Republicans. The fact is that a little rigidity on the conservative side might level the playing field.

Bottom line: Republicans offer the pain that comes with death by inches. Democrats offer a quick death although far from painless. Democrats will inflict their pain on generation after generation. Barack Taqiyya is proving that.

Finally, the quick death offered by Barack Taqiyya unwittingly awakened a sleeping giant. President Hillary Clinton can only make the giant angrier. An establishment Republican president is no alternative to Clinton. The current Republican party and the media are hoping to install their choice so they can tranquilize the giant until it can be euthanized without too much fuss.

Regarding the death of political ideologies. I hear no voices in media circles calling for the death of Socialism. Conservatives should not panic over setbacks. Suicide is surer than relying on establishment Republicans to administer the coup de grâce:


Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. John Adams
 
Last edited:
Hillary Clinton is no lock in 2016 in spite of Goldberg practically administering the oath of office. In fact, of all of the Democrat wannabes I’m aware of she is the easiest Democrat to beat. Here’s why:

In addition the reasons I gave in the OP, Jackie Mason treed Hillary Clinton with his usual way of going to the heart of the matter.

Comedian Jackie Mason, who has made it known he thinks President Obama is a lying “maniac,” is also unloading on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as an “empty-headed” invention of the press who could actually be put on trial “as a murderer” for her role in the Benghazi fiasco that left four Americans dead.

I believe that it was Dan Rostenkowski (1928 - 2010) who first called Clinton “The smartest woman in the world.” If my memory is not failing me I think the old yardbird said it in relation to Hillarycare. Wouldn’t it be poetic justice if HillaryCare II contributes mightily to her downfall?

Click on the link to hear an audio of Mason’s comments:


“Because the truth of the matter is she’s accomplished nothing in her life and she’s an invention of the press. The press is a Democratic Party press in this country, and when they pick out somebody to anoint them for the position of the presidency, they elevate them every single day in the paper as a brilliant woman. When you see ‘brilliant woman’ every day, and if you’re not involved in politics, you assume she must be a brilliant woman, because you’re reading it every day in the paper.”

“So they invented her as some kind of a genius,” Mason continued, “and nobody is studying the situation to find out what she really is. What she really is is an empty-headed person who accomplished nothing all her life. And they created a piece of fiction out of absolutely nothing. It’s just like they took a person from the street and they decided that this guy who’s sweeping toilets all his life really should be the president because he’s not really in the toilet, he’s creating the toilet.”

Comedian launches merciless attack on Hillary
Calls Mrs. Clinton 'empty-headed case for a sanitarium'
Published: 11 hours ago
JOE KOVACS

Comedian launches merciless attack on Hillary
 
Last edited:
Come 2016 Hillary Clinton faces a bigger problem than Democrats are facing in the midterms. Private sector Democrats, along with everyone else, will be severely punished by the ACA after it is fully implemented; lost health insurance, higher costs for less coverage, HMO doctors, privacy, and so on.

Clinton & Taqiyya began lying in 2007 when they said you could keep your own doctor. Hillary cleverly worded her “promise” to hide the truth —— you could not CHOOSE your doctor if you changed doctors, or if your doctor retired, or if you picked a doctor for the first time, or if you needed a specialist. Away back in 2007 I said that universal healthcare had to operate like a HMO in order to combine it with an affirmative action program.

Hillary Clinton lied about keeping your own doctor before Barack Taqiyya picked up on the lie and ran with it. Well here comes the HMO:


UnitedHealth drops thousands of doctors from insurance plans: WSJ
Reuters 18 hours ago

UnitedHealth drops thousands of doctors from insurance plans: WSJ

God, I pray that Hillary gets the nomination in 2016. I cannot see one elderly person voting for her after they finally realize what she has been up to:

Hillary Clinton: I have proposed the American Health Choices Plan. Here's how it would work: If you have private insurance, nothing changes. You keep that insurance. If you like your doctor you have, you keep him.

 
God, I pray that Hillary gets the nomination in 2016.

I’ve changed my mind. Instead of praying, I am going to trust the good Lord to pick the right one from among the best three the Democrats have to offer —— Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, or Cherokee Elizabeth Warren.

Warren, a scourge of (other) economic royalists and especially of large financial institutions, is a William Jennings Bryan for our time: She has risen from among Harvard’s downtrodden to proclaim: “You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of derivatives.”

Before she sank to a senator’s salary, she was among the 1 percenters, whose annual incomes now begin at $394,000. Hillary Clinton recently made more than that from two speeches, five days apart, for Goldman Sachs, a prowling Wall Street carnivore that Warren presumably wants to domesticate. Between Warren, hot in pursuit of malefactors of great wealth, and Clinton, hot in pursuit of great wealth, which candidate would be more fun for the kind of people who compose the Democrats’ nominating electorate?

Bored with Hillary Clinton, looking to Elizabeth Warren
By George F. Will, E-mail the writer

George F. Will: Democrats bored with Hillary Clinton look to Elizabeth Warren - The Washington Post

The best part

Democrats are in so much trouble party bosses are lucky to have three wannabes willing to bite the bullet for the team. The only benefit in running that I can see is all that dough candidates get in campaign contributions that they don’t spend buys them some personal influence down the line.

A bit of advice for campaign workers. Watch out for rubber checks. Your guy will be looking to save money not throw it away on a losing bid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top