Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Let's be clear... Not so much as ONE individual has ever starved to death in the US because they did not get a welfare check.
And no one said they have, you big dummy.
I did. You ignored it.So you're gonna double down on your tabloid smears, with lots of extra right wing extremist links, that you know darn good and well i'm not gonna read?
How about we do this, how about if you throw one topic out there to address, no doubt from a credible news source. I'll discuss one topic at a time. Sound fair?
Video shows tarmac welcome, no snipers
Video shows tarmac welcome, no snipers
We have questioned Clinton's previous remarks about her foreign policy experience. We found her statements that she helped bring peace to Northern Ireland and that she stood up to the Chinese government on women's rights to be Half True. We found her statement that she negotiated open borders for Kosovars to be Barely True.
There's no doubt flying into Bosnia was dangerous back in 1996, but the threat of sniper fire is not the same as actual sniper fire, and hustling off the tarmac is not the same as running with your head down. Yes, Clinton later acknowledged that she was mistaken, but it's hard to understand how she could err on something so significant as whether she did or didn't dodge sniper bullets. Quite simply, this kind of hyperbole deserves our harshest assessment. We rule Pants on Fire.
I admit, this is something I view as a non issue, because there are bigger fish to fry. I do agree that Hillary lied about sniper fire, and exaggerated her situation.
But now I'm curious...who are you voting for? There's only two presidential candidates that don't have a "pants on fire" page over on PolitiFact, and one of them is Bernie Sanders.
Trump: Bernie Sanders wants to tax 'you people' at 90 percent
Donald Trump, pants on fire
Jeb Bush: Planned Parenthood isn't involved in women's health
Jeb Bush, pants on fire.
Ben Carson says pediatricians realize need to cut down number and proximity of vaccines
Ben Carson, pants on fire
Chris Christie claims 3 lanes off George Washington Bridge are dedicated to Fort Lee
Chris Christie, pants on fire
Fiorina attacks Boxer for caring more about
Carly Fiorina, pants on fire
Ted Cruz: Democrats threatened to close Catholic Church hospitals and charities over their beliefs
Ted Cruz, pants on fire
Mike Huckabee says if you cut out just four states, U.S. gun-homicide rate drops to Belgium's level
Mike Huckabee, pants on fire
Ohio Gov. John Kasich puts words in Abraham Lincoln's mouth about tax policy
John Kasich, pants on fire
Did Rand Paul propose cutting off aid to Israel?
Rand Paul, pants on fire
IF the system weren't rigged, I might bother to vote. As it is, I won't. I won't support a system that is corrupt and enslaves people minds and spirits.
I went to that site. Even though that site is a good example of how the system is rigged. I used that one, because I knew YOU would accept it as an example of a "good" news source. What crap.
Complete and utter nonsense. Politifact is establishment nonsense.
The establishment determines who is viable, isn't that it? I notice that you didn't list Jill Stein. You know why? Because of her position on trade, the banking cartel, and resource wars will never garner her any amount of coverage on the corporate establishment controlled media. Heaven forbid Americans have an ACTUAL CHOICE?
You do not have a free thinking mind. Free thinkers don't vote for their own enslavement. They certainly don't read propaganda and believe it is, "unbiased truth."
Seriously, you should have no fear about going to conservative pundits to find out what a big fat liar Hillary is, and going to liberal pundits to find out what a big fat scum bag pukes all the Republican clowns are. For information on anyone that would represent YOUR interests, you would have to go to independent media or their actual personal web sites, and the establishment will make sure they aren't even allowed to be on the ballots or allowed in the televised debates. The reason should be obvious.
The point is, IF you deign to vote for Hillary, YOU ARE VOTING for evil. You are responsible for the wars. YOU are responsible for the increasing wealth gap. YOU are responsible for the increase in ethnic conflict. You will be responsible for everything the is on the Agenda 21 and in the planning of the NWO.
You want to support this corrupt system? Show your support, cast your vote. But when other nations and terrorists are bombing us, and invading us, just remember, IT'S YOUR FAULT, you voted for it.
If you're not even voting, then you have no room to bitch over who's elected.
Why are you even on this forum, discussing politics, if you're not planning on voting?
You're really sounding like a partisan hack now. The site, "your source" is only a good one when it bashes Hillary. smh...
Wow. Government schooling and corporate propaganda have really done a number on you, haven't they? You sure love your slave master, don't you?
As far as the source issue? You didn't comprehend what I wrote.
What I meant, is that a source is fine if it bashes Hillary if it is a conservative one, they will dig for the dirt. But you must have missed the part where I ALSO said a source is fine if it digs up dirt on Republicans. I am sure you have no problem with liberal sources that dig up stuff on conservatives. Sure, they have a bias as well. A person with an open mind looks into all sources and doesn't fall for a poisoning the well fallacy. Look at the facts.
Only an idiot would vote for someone who signed off on the PNAC goals.I did. You ignored it.
Video shows tarmac welcome, no snipers
Video shows tarmac welcome, no snipers
We have questioned Clinton's previous remarks about her foreign policy experience. We found her statements that she helped bring peace to Northern Ireland and that she stood up to the Chinese government on women's rights to be Half True. We found her statement that she negotiated open borders for Kosovars to be Barely True.
There's no doubt flying into Bosnia was dangerous back in 1996, but the threat of sniper fire is not the same as actual sniper fire, and hustling off the tarmac is not the same as running with your head down. Yes, Clinton later acknowledged that she was mistaken, but it's hard to understand how she could err on something so significant as whether she did or didn't dodge sniper bullets. Quite simply, this kind of hyperbole deserves our harshest assessment. We rule Pants on Fire.
I admit, this is something I view as a non issue, because there are bigger fish to fry. I do agree that Hillary lied about sniper fire, and exaggerated her situation.
But now I'm curious...who are you voting for? There's only two presidential candidates that don't have a "pants on fire" page over on PolitiFact, and one of them is Bernie Sanders.
Trump: Bernie Sanders wants to tax 'you people' at 90 percent
Donald Trump, pants on fire
Jeb Bush: Planned Parenthood isn't involved in women's health
Jeb Bush, pants on fire.
Ben Carson says pediatricians realize need to cut down number and proximity of vaccines
Ben Carson, pants on fire
Chris Christie claims 3 lanes off George Washington Bridge are dedicated to Fort Lee
Chris Christie, pants on fire
Fiorina attacks Boxer for caring more about
Carly Fiorina, pants on fire
Ted Cruz: Democrats threatened to close Catholic Church hospitals and charities over their beliefs
Ted Cruz, pants on fire
Mike Huckabee says if you cut out just four states, U.S. gun-homicide rate drops to Belgium's level
Mike Huckabee, pants on fire
Ohio Gov. John Kasich puts words in Abraham Lincoln's mouth about tax policy
John Kasich, pants on fire
Did Rand Paul propose cutting off aid to Israel?
Rand Paul, pants on fire
IF the system weren't rigged, I might bother to vote. As it is, I won't. I won't support a system that is corrupt and enslaves people minds and spirits.
I went to that site. Even though that site is a good example of how the system is rigged. I used that one, because I knew YOU would accept it as an example of a "good" news source. What crap.
Complete and utter nonsense. Politifact is establishment nonsense.
The establishment determines who is viable, isn't that it? I notice that you didn't list Jill Stein. You know why? Because of her position on trade, the banking cartel, and resource wars will never garner her any amount of coverage on the corporate establishment controlled media. Heaven forbid Americans have an ACTUAL CHOICE?
You do not have a free thinking mind. Free thinkers don't vote for their own enslavement. They certainly don't read propaganda and believe it is, "unbiased truth."
Seriously, you should have no fear about going to conservative pundits to find out what a big fat liar Hillary is, and going to liberal pundits to find out what a big fat scum bag pukes all the Republican clowns are. For information on anyone that would represent YOUR interests, you would have to go to independent media or their actual personal web sites, and the establishment will make sure they aren't even allowed to be on the ballots or allowed in the televised debates. The reason should be obvious.
The point is, IF you deign to vote for Hillary, YOU ARE VOTING for evil. You are responsible for the wars. YOU are responsible for the increasing wealth gap. YOU are responsible for the increase in ethnic conflict. You will be responsible for everything the is on the Agenda 21 and in the planning of the NWO.
You want to support this corrupt system? Show your support, cast your vote. But when other nations and terrorists are bombing us, and invading us, just remember, IT'S YOUR FAULT, you voted for it.
If you're not even voting, then you have no room to bitch over who's elected.
Why are you even on this forum, discussing politics, if you're not planning on voting?
You're really sounding like a partisan hack now. The site, "your source" is only a good one when it bashes Hillary. smh...
Wow. Government schooling and corporate propaganda have really done a number on you, haven't they? You sure love your slave master, don't you?
As far as the source issue? You didn't comprehend what I wrote.
What I meant, is that a source is fine if it bashes Hillary if it is a conservative one, they will dig for the dirt. But you must have missed the part where I ALSO said a source is fine if it digs up dirt on Republicans. I am sure you have no problem with liberal sources that dig up stuff on conservatives. Sure, they have a bias as well. A person with an open mind looks into all sources and doesn't fall for a poisoning the well fallacy. Look at the facts.
How long has it been since you voted last? Since George W. Bush? LOL!
He was raised poor with the food stamps. He would have been raised poor without them. And he still would have been raised by the same parent.
Right, with just less to eat, Dingbat.
Again, I'm fascinated and appalled by this leftist theory that parents simply let their children starve if the government doesn't buy them food. The more you talk, the less inclined I would be to even let you own a pet, much less raise a child.
No one here has ever said that poor people would simply let their children starve without Government assistance, you silly dingbat.
I have 4 pugs and two adult children who have never missed a meal, so don't you bring my pets or my children into this, you ignorant bitch.
Ben Carson himself, stated that his mother, who had a 3rd grade education, would not have been unable to put food on the table without assistance from the Government. Who better to listen to than the man himself?
Even with the assistance his mother received, they still had to struggle to make it. I hope Ben Carson remembers where he came from. If not for that assistance, it's highly unlikely he would be where he is today.
I am happy, for the sake of your children and pets, that you have never been put in a position of making hard choices to care for them, you bullshitting troglodyte. Your dislike for the meaning of the words coming out of your keyboard is of supreme indifference to me. You make it abundantly clear that you cannot imagine parenting unless Daddy Government is backing you up and guiding you. So I have no trouble believing that you think it was the food stamps that made Ben Carson who he is today. You're clearly that stupid, and more.
Maybe it's time you read Ben Carson's autobiography, instead of repeating your ridiculous straw man argument.
No doubt, Mother Carson deserves tremendous credit, but — in the words of a political sound bite from the last presidential election — she didn’t do it alone. Carson, in his book, tells how his grades improved tremendously when a government program provided him with free eyeglasses because he could barely see. Not only that, in “Gifted Hands” we read this nugget: “By the time I reached ninth grade, mother had made such strides that she received nothing but food stamps. She couldn’t have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy.”
Ben Carson So Glad His Welfare Mom Wasn't Dependent On Government - Wonkette
Let's be clear... Not so much as ONE individual has ever starved to death in the US because they did not get a welfare check.
This in contrast to the TENS of Millions of Individual lives that have been RUINED BY their dependency upon the lie that is socialism
Right, with just less to eat, Dingbat.
Again, I'm fascinated and appalled by this leftist theory that parents simply let their children starve if the government doesn't buy them food. The more you talk, the less inclined I would be to even let you own a pet, much less raise a child.
No one here has ever said that poor people would simply let their children starve without Government assistance, you silly dingbat.
I have 4 pugs and two adult children who have never missed a meal, so don't you bring my pets or my children into this, you ignorant bitch.
Ben Carson himself, stated that his mother, who had a 3rd grade education, would not have been unable to put food on the table without assistance from the Government. Who better to listen to than the man himself?
Even with the assistance his mother received, they still had to struggle to make it. I hope Ben Carson remembers where he came from. If not for that assistance, it's highly unlikely he would be where he is today.
I am happy, for the sake of your children and pets, that you have never been put in a position of making hard choices to care for them, you bullshitting troglodyte. Your dislike for the meaning of the words coming out of your keyboard is of supreme indifference to me. You make it abundantly clear that you cannot imagine parenting unless Daddy Government is backing you up and guiding you. So I have no trouble believing that you think it was the food stamps that made Ben Carson who he is today. You're clearly that stupid, and more.
Maybe it's time you read Ben Carson's autobiography, instead of repeating your ridiculous straw man argument.
No doubt, Mother Carson deserves tremendous credit, but — in the words of a political sound bite from the last presidential election — she didn’t do it alone. Carson, in his book, tells how his grades improved tremendously when a government program provided him with free eyeglasses because he could barely see. Not only that, in “Gifted Hands” we read this nugget: “By the time I reached ninth grade, mother had made such strides that she received nothing but food stamps. She couldn’t have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy.”
Ben Carson So Glad His Welfare Mom Wasn't Dependent On Government - Wonkette
I love how you pompously try to instruct me on what I should read and know, and then source your self-aggrandizing rant with Wonkette.
Congratulations. You win today's trophy for Most Useless Organism in Existence. There are literally no words to explain how meaningless you are on every single level of consideration.
Just . . . wow.
You wish to bring back starvation ...
[‘Ben Gots free glasses frum a gubbament program’]
[‘Ben Gots free glasses frum a gubbament program’]
Huh... Ben Got Free Glasses!
And because of that, Ben became something entirely different from ALL OF THE OTHER KIDS THAT GTS THEM FREE GUBMINT GLASSES TOO, AND IN THE SAME PLACE AND AT THE SAME TIME AS BEN GOTS HIS FREE GLASSES!
Yes... Ben rejected socialism and became: A SUCCESS! And this DESPITE SOCIALISM... not due to it.
Here you are calling Ben a liar.
Here you are calling Ben a liar.
No... I'm simply pointing out that YOU are a liar.
Here you are calling Ben a liar.
No... I'm simply pointing out that YOU are a liar.
Ben is the one who said it. I'm just pointing out what he said.
Here you are calling Ben a liar.
No... I'm simply pointing out that YOU are a liar.
Ben is the one who said it. I'm just pointing out what he said.
Ben said "it"? Where did Ben Carson say that he became the world's most renowned pediatric neurosurgeon, because he "gots him some free gubmint glasses".
LMAO!!! Boy, that is rich! His mother taught him to not be dependent on the system, by being dependent on the system?
LOL! You absolutely SUCK at this don't ya sis?
If he was dependent, he wouldn't be independent. His Mother worked her ass off... provided for her children and would have done so, just as well, without welfare. They would not have starved, they would not have died... they would have prevailed, as both her sons have long since done.
See how that works?
If you listen to parts of the media.....Hillary is doing a victory lap after winning the White House. She came off so smooth and practiced in comparison to the sometimes flustered investigators, who knew she was lying her ass off, it was startling.....to the media. They wanted the truth.....and she only gave them half of the truth and at times none of the truth. It was masterful. How can a person lie that convincingly, knowing that what they're saying is a lie, and everyone in the room knows they're lying, and not feel a particle of remorse? This is what was amazing. Hillary feels no shame. He feels that regardless of the fact that her negligence caused the deaths of friends that she sent there personally, she doesn't feel any real remorse. If she voices any, it's only to gain sympathy, not show embarrassment. I would have loved to put a lie-detector machine on her to see if her pulse went up while she was relating testimony that she knew was total BS.
Is this what Democrat voters want? A president that lies so blatantly that even though everyone in the room knows it's a bold-faced lie.....it doesn't seem to matter. A president has to make life and death decisions all of the time. If your decision making is faulty....people die. I prefer wisdom and sound judgment over an attitude that nothing you do wrong will come back to haunt you, or that you aren't accountable for any mistake you make. Is that the kind of president we want? I prefer the first interview over this one. At least her arrogance was in full display when she pounded her desk and said "What Difference Does It Make" that these killers were terrorists or just protesters out to raise Hell over a video. That was the real Hillary. Or was it? That's the problem here. What is Hillary really like....because we rarely ever see it.
October 25, 2015Links Krauthammer: "We're Living In An Age Where What You Say And Its Relation With The Facts Is Completely Irrelevant"
Do Hillary's Lies Matter?
By Clarice Feldman
It is of little concern to me that the corporate media says Hillary aced the Benghazi hearing, To me she didn’t, and I care more that the public is being inured to public officials’ lying. Were I running for president against her I’d produce a simple campaign video.
My campaign video would be short -- it would be Hillary before the caskets of the four Americans slaughtered in Benghazi blaming an obscure video and its maker for the incident; Hillary telling the father of one of the deceased, Ty Woods, that the video maker would be arrested (“we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son"), and her testimony before the committee that she never blamed it on the video. The ad would take just a couple of minutes. . Message at end -- are you ready for a president who lies over the bodies of dead American patriots?
Maybe I’ve misjudged the voters. Maybe they really would like a brazen, self-seeking consummate liar. Because that’s what she certainly is.
She dissembled so often in the hearings I cannot possibly keep you awake while detailing them all. Let me pick just a few of her more outrageous lies -- the video and her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal.
Roskam vs. Clinton: Before Benghazi Happened You Were Preparing To Take Political Credit For Libya
State Can’t Verify Clinton Email Claim Made At Benghazi Hearing
Other media deceptions......
Trump leading everywhere but the one poll the media wants us to focus on in Iowa - RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls
If you listen to parts of the media.....Hillary is doing a victory lap after winning the White House. She came off so smooth and practiced in comparison to the sometimes flustered investigators, who knew she was lying her ass off, it was startling.....to the media. They wanted the truth.....and she only gave them half of the truth and at times none of the truth. It was masterful. How can a person lie that convincingly, knowing that what they're saying is a lie, and everyone in the room knows they're lying, and not feel a particle of remorse? This is what was amazing. Hillary feels no shame. He feels that regardless of the fact that her negligence caused the deaths of friends that she sent there personally, she doesn't feel any real remorse. If she voices any, it's only to gain sympathy, not show embarrassment. I would have loved to put a lie-detector machine on her to see if her pulse went up while she was relating testimony that she knew was total BS.
Is this what Democrat voters want? A president that lies so blatantly that even though everyone in the room knows it's a bold-faced lie.....it doesn't seem to matter. A president has to make life and death decisions all of the time. If your decision making is faulty....people die. I prefer wisdom and sound judgment over an attitude that nothing you do wrong will come back to haunt you, or that you aren't accountable for any mistake you make. Is that the kind of president we want? I prefer the first interview over this one. At least her arrogance was in full display when she pounded her desk and said "What Difference Does It Make" that these killers were terrorists or just protesters out to raise Hell over a video. That was the real Hillary. Or was it? That's the problem here. What is Hillary really like....because we rarely ever see it.
October 25, 2015Links Krauthammer: "We're Living In An Age Where What You Say And Its Relation With The Facts Is Completely Irrelevant"
Do Hillary's Lies Matter?
By Clarice Feldman
It is of little concern to me that the corporate media says Hillary aced the Benghazi hearing, To me she didn’t, and I care more that the public is being inured to public officials’ lying. Were I running for president against her I’d produce a simple campaign video.
My campaign video would be short -- it would be Hillary before the caskets of the four Americans slaughtered in Benghazi blaming an obscure video and its maker for the incident; Hillary telling the father of one of the deceased, Ty Woods, that the video maker would be arrested (“we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son"), and her testimony before the committee that she never blamed it on the video. The ad would take just a couple of minutes. . Message at end -- are you ready for a president who lies over the bodies of dead American patriots?
Maybe I’ve misjudged the voters. Maybe they really would like a brazen, self-seeking consummate liar. Because that’s what she certainly is.
She dissembled so often in the hearings I cannot possibly keep you awake while detailing them all. Let me pick just a few of her more outrageous lies -- the video and her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal.
Roskam vs. Clinton: Before Benghazi Happened You Were Preparing To Take Political Credit For Libya
State Can’t Verify Clinton Email Claim Made At Benghazi Hearing
Other media deceptions......
Trump leading everywhere but the one poll the media wants us to focus on in Iowa - RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls
Funny how you guys are so concerned about Hillary when all you need to do is put out a better candidate. The trouble is that you don't have one.