CDZ Democrats and the Media are just making things up about the Atlanta Shooting

[JoeB131]

The democrat party understands they have their vote, so they don't care that blacks in democrat party cities target them for violence. Blacks attack Asians because the Asians open businesses in democrat party controlled cities, and actually become successful, sending their children to college to become Doctors and Lawyers....while blacks who depend on the democrat party suffer generational poverty.........

That's why.

Actually, there is a lot of resentment towards those Asian shopkeepers because they treat their customers with quite a lot of contempt. There are also unfounded rumors that they get special loans from the government to set up shop. (Not true, but largely believed) So, yes, when riots break out, they are often the targets of collective anger.

Here's the reality- Blacks are largely better off today thanks to Democratic Policies than they were in 1964, when the GOP embraced the Southern Strategy and decided they didn't care about civil rights.

 

[JoeB131]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

 

[Flash]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

You stupid confused Moon Bat.

The Muslim terrorist was targeting those White people. He killed all ten of them. It was a hate crime under the definition you idiot Libtards use all the time.

Stop being in denial about Muslim terrorism. You are embarrassing yourself. It just makes you look like more of a stupid Moon Bat than we already think you are.

 

[JoeB131]

You stupid confused Moon Bat.

The Muslim terrorist was targeting those White people. He killed all ten of them. It was a hate crime under the definition you idiot Libtards use all the time.

Stop being in denial about Muslim terrorism. You are embarrassing yourself. It just makes you look like more of a stupid Moon Bat than we already think you are.

Was he? Actually, all the accounts of this guy is that he was a severe paranoid who thought people were following him.

Nothing to do with race or religion.

 

[2aguy]

The democrat party understands they have their vote, so they don't care that blacks in democrat party cities target them for violence. Blacks attack Asians because the Asians open businesses in democrat party controlled cities, and actually become successful, sending their children to college to become Doctors and Lawyers....while blacks who depend on the democrat party suffer generational poverty.........

That's why.

Actually, there is a lot of resentment towards those Asian shopkeepers because they treat their customers with quite a lot of contempt. There are also unfounded rumors that they get special loans from the government to set up shop. (Not true, but largely believed) So, yes, when riots break out, they are often the targets of collective anger.

Here's the reality- Blacks are largely better off today thanks to Democratic Policies than they were in 1964, when the GOP embraced the Southern Strategy and decided they didn't care about civil rights.

The GOP did not do the Southern Strategy, you have been shown over and over how that is a lie......you have been shown the New York Times story that stated Nixon did not embrace the strategy, you have been shown the election results......and yet you still choose to lie and spread the lie.

Blacks are not nearly as well off as they were before the Great Society destroyed black families.....out of wedlock birth rates, education rates, and other factors that were going up before the mid 1960s have cratered due to the policies of the racist democrat party.

 

[2aguy]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

No...he was targeting sex workers in massage parlors....had the sex workers he interacted with been Ukrainians, he would have shot them instead...

 

[Flash]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

No...he was targeting sex workers in massage parlors....had the sex workers he interacted with been Ukrainians, he would have shot them instead...

Give the stupid Moon Bat a break.

They didn't tell the low information Moon Bats that fact on CNN so they don't know.

 

[JoeB131]

The GOP did not do the Southern Strategy, you have been shown over and over how that is a lie......you have been shown the New York Times story that stated Nixon did not embrace the strategy, you have been shown the election results......and yet you still choose to lie and spread the lie.

Nixon's own people have said there was a Southern Strategy.

No...he was targeting sex workers in massage parlors....had the sex workers he interacted with been Ukrainians, he would have shot them instead...

Except there's no evidence these women in their 50s, 60s and 70's were engaged in sex work.

Blacks are not nearly as well off as they were before the Great Society destroyed black families.....out of wedlock birth rates, education rates, and other factors that were going up before the mid 1960s have cratered due to the policies of the racist democrat party.

Uh, they don't have to ride on the back of the bus, there has been a growth of the black middle class since 1965.

 

[2aguy]

The GOP did not do the Southern Strategy, you have been shown over and over how that is a lie......you have been shown the New York Times story that stated Nixon did not embrace the strategy, you have been shown the election results......and yet you still choose to lie and spread the lie.

Nixon's own people have said there was a Southern Strategy.

No...he was targeting sex workers in massage parlors....had the sex workers he interacted with been Ukrainians, he would have shot them instead...

Except there's no evidence these women in their 50s, 60s and 70's were engaged in sex work.

Blacks are not nearly as well off as they were before the Great Society destroyed black families.....out of wedlock birth rates, education rates, and other factors that were going up before the mid 1960s have cratered due to the policies of the racist democrat party.

Uh, they don't have to ride on the back of the bus, there has been a growth of the black middle class since 1965.

No...they didn't.....and I showed you the article from the New York Times, where they stated Nixon didn't listen to the guy....

the creator of the southern strategy was rejected….

see page 4, bottom of first column...

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf





On the Southern Strategy lie itself......

The “Southern Strategy” is a Lie | Pundit House

Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, which the democrats say is the reason black people had to support them during the 1960’s--is a lie. And it’s probably the biggest lie that’s been told to the blacks since Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government after getting the NAACP to support him...

pundithouse.com

Believe it or not, the entire myth was created by an unknown editor at the New York Times who didn’t do his job and read a story he was given to edit.

On May 17, 1970, the New York Times published an article written by James Boyd. The headline, written by our unknown editor, was “Nixon’s Southern Strategy: It’s All in the Charts.”

The article was about a very controversial political analyst named Kevin Phillips. Phillips believed that everyone voted according to their ethnic background, not according to their individual beliefs. And all a candidate had to do is frame their message according to whatever moves a particular ethnic group.

Phillips offered his services to the Nixon campaign. But if our unknown editor had bothered to read the story completely, he would’ve seen that Phillip’s and his theory was completely rejected!

Boyd wrote in his article, “Though Phillips’s ideas for an aggressive anti-liberal campaign strategy that would hasten defection of the working-class democrats to the republicans did not prevail in the 1968 campaign, he won the respect John Mitchell.” (Mitchell was a well-known Washington insider at the time).

A lazy, negligent editor partially read the story. And wrote a headline for it that attributed Nixon’s campaign success–to a plan he rejected.

In fact, Phillips isn’t even mentioned in Nixon’s memoirs.

Is all of this the result of a negligent copy editor at the New York Times? Or did they purposely work with the Democrat Party to create this myth? That has crossed my mind and it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.



********

The “Southern Strategy” is a Lie | Pundit House

Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, which the democrats say is the reason black people had to support them during the 1960’s--is a lie. And it’s probably the biggest lie that’s been told to the blacks since Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government after getting the NAACP to support him...

pundithouse.com

Ken Raymond
Jun 2011

Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”, which the democrats say is the reason black people had to support them during the 1960′s–is a lie.

And it’s probably the biggest lie that’s been told to the blacks since Woodrow Wilson segregated the federal government after getting the NAACP to support him.
After talking with black voters across the country about why they overwhelmingly supports democrats, the common answer that’s emerges is the Southern Strategy.

I’ve heard of the Southern Strategy too. But since it doesn’t make a difference in how I decide to vote, I never bothered to research it. But apparently it still influences how many African Americans vote today. That makes it worth investigating.

For those that might be unfamiliar with the Southern Strategy, I’ll briefly review the story. After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, most blacks registered as democrats and it’s been that way ever since.

And that doesn’t make any sense when you consider the fact that it was the democrats that established, and fought for, Jim Crow laws and segregation in the first place. And the republicans have a very noble history of fighting for the civil rights of blacks.

The reason black people moved to the democrats, given by media pundits and educational institutions for the decades, is that when republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon ran for president in 1968, he employed a racist plan that’s now infamously called the Southern Strategy.

The Southern Strategy basically means Nixon allegedly used hidden code words that appealed to the racists within the Democrat party and throughout the south. This secret language caused a seismic shift in the electoral landscape that moved the evil racist democrats into the republican camp and the noble-hearted republicans into the democrat camp.

And here’s what I found, Nixon did not use a plan to appeal to racist white voters.

First, let’s look at the presidential candidates of 1968. Richard Nixon was the republican candidate; Hubert Humphrey was the democrat nominee; and George Wallace was a third party candidate.

Remember George Wallace? Wallace was the democrat governor of Alabama from 1963 until 1967. And it was Wallace that ordered the Eugene “Bull” Connor, and the police department, to attack Dr. Martin Luther King

Jr. and 2,500 protesters in Montgomery , Alabama in 1965. And it was Governor Wallace that ordered a blockade at the admissions office at the University of Alabama to prevent blacks from enrolling in 1963.

Governor Wallace was a true racist and a determined segregationist. And he ran as the nominee from the American Independent Party, which was he founded.

Richard Nixon wrote about the 1968 campaign in his book RN: the Memoirs of Richard Nixon originally published in 1978.

In his book, Nixon wrote this about campaigning in the south, “The deep south had to be virtually conceded to George Wallace. I could not match him there without compromising on civil rights, which I would not do.”

The media coverage of the 1968 presidential race also showed that Nixon was in favor of the Civil Rights and would not compromise on that issue. For example, in an article published in theWashington Post on September 15, 1968 headlined “Nixon Sped Integration, Wallace says” Wallace declared that Nixon agreed with Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren and played a role in ”the destruction of public school system.” Wallace pledged to restore the school system, in the same article, by giving it back to the states ”lock, stock, and barrel.”

This story, as well as Nixon’s memoirs and other news stories during that campaign, shows that Nixon was very clear about his position on civil rights. And if Nixon was used code words only racists could hear, evidently George Wallace couldn’t hear it.

Among the southern states, George Wallace won Arkansas , Mississippi , Alabama , Georgia and Louisiana . Nixon won North Carolina , South Carolina , Florida , Virginia , and Tennessee . Winning those states were part of Nixon’s plan.

“I would not concede the Carolina ‘s, Florida , or Virginia or the states around the rim of the south,”Nixon wrote. ”These states were a part of my plan.”

At that time, the entire southern region was the poorest in the country. The south consistently lagged behind the rest of the United States in income. And according to the

“U.S. Regional Growth and Convergence,” by Kris James Mitchener and Ian W. McLean, per capita income for southerners was almost half as much as it was for Americans in other regions.

Nixon won those states strictly on economic issues. He focused on increasing tariffs on foreign imports to protect the manufacturing and agriculture industries of those states. Some southern elected officials agreed to support him for the sake of their economies, including South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond.

“I had been consulting privately with Thurmond for several months and I was convinced that he’d join my campaign if he were satisfied on the two issues of paramount concern to him: national defense and tariffs against textile imports to protect South Carolina ‘s position in the industry.”Nixon wrote in his memoirs.

In fact, Nixon made it clear to the southern elected officials that he would not compromise on the civil rights issue.

“On civil rights, Thurmond knew my position was very different from his,” Nixon wrote. “I was for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and he was against it. Although he disagreed with me, he respected my sincerity and candor.”

The same scenario played out among elected officials and voters in other southern states won by Nixon. They laid their feelings aside and supported him because of his economic platform’”not because Nixon sent messages on a frequency only racists can hear.
=================

Nixon had an excellent record on civil rights. He supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. He was an avid champion of the desegregation of public schools. The progressive columnist Tom Wicker wrote in the New York Times, “There’s no doubt about it — the Nixon administration accomplished more in 1970 to desegregate Southern school systems than had been done in the 16 previous years or probably since. There’s no doubt either that it was Richard Nixon personally who conceived and led the administration’s desegregation effort.”

Upon his taking office in 1969, Nixon also put into effect America’s first affirmative action program. Dubbed the Philadelphia Plan, it imposed racial goals and timetables on the building trade unions, first in Philadelphia and then elsewhere. Now, would a man seeking to build an electoral base of Deep South white supremacists actually promote the first program to legally discriminate in favor of blacks? This is absurd.

Nixon barely campaigned in the Deep South. His strategy, as outlined by Kevin Phillips in his classic work, “The Emerging Republican Majority,” was to target the Sunbelt, the vast swath of territory stretching from Florida to Nixon’s native California. This included what Phillips terms the Outer or Peripheral South.

Nixon recognized the South was changing. It was becoming more industrialized, with many northerners moving to the Sunbelt. Nixon’s focus, Phillips writes, was on the non-racist, upwardly-mobile, largely urban voters of the Outer or Peripheral South. Nixon won these voters, and he lost the Deep South, which went to Democratic segregationist George Wallace.

And how many racist Dixiecrats did Nixon win for the GOP? Turns out, virtually none. Among the racist Dixiecrats, Strom Thurmond of South Carolina was the sole senator to defect to the Republicans — and he did this long before Nixon’s time. Only one Dixiecrat congressman, Albert Watson of South Carolina, switched to the GOP. The rest, more than 200 Dixiecrat senators, congressmen, governors and high elected officials, all stayed in the Democratic Party.

The progressive notion of a Dixiecrat switch is a myth. Yet it is myth that continues to be promoted, using dubious case examples. Though the late Sens. Jesse Helms of North Carolina and John Tower of Texas and former Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott all switched from the Democratic Party to the GOP, none of these men was a Dixiecrat.

The South, as a whole, became Republican during the 1980s and 1990s. This had nothing to do with Nixon; it was because of Ronald Reagan and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.” The conservative appeal to patriotism, anti-communism, free markets, pro-life and Christianity had far more to do with the South’s movement into the GOP camp than anything related to race.

Yet the myth of Nixon’s Southern Strategy endures — not because it’s true, but because it conveniently serves to exculpate the crimes of the Democratic Party. Somehow the party that promoted slavery, segregation, Jim Crow and racial terrorism gets to wipe its slate clean by pretending that, with Nixon’s connivance, the Republicans stole all their racists. It’s time we recognize this excuse for what it is: one more Democratic big lie.
-----

I don’t think the democrats projected their sins on republicans just for political gain. When an institution has had control over a group of people for over 200 years, does anyone believe they’re going to let them go so easily? I don’t think so.

I don’t believe this myth was created to only hurt republicans; it was also created so democrats can keep their historic control over the lives of African Americans.

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’

 

[Donald H]

What could be so important to some Americans that would motivate them into attempting to distract from the plain fact that this example of more American gun violence wasn't an example of racism against Asian women?

As a Canadian I would tend to grant the benefit of the doubt to the racism accusation being the most likely by far!
Let one of America's courts show otherwise, if indeed some court can be found that hasn't been already corrupted by politically motivated racism!

Hitler's regime could never have been challenged or interrupted in any way in any court of law, be the issue been racism against Germany's Jews or any other issue. Thelir courts had become thoroughly and completely corrupted by political bias in favour of Hitler and his agenda.

America's justice system was on track to becoming the same but it was stopped short of complete corruption with an election.

A just and fair election? Or a stolen election? It's no longer an important distinction.

Can America's courts still find that racist crimes are still judged to be racism by nature? The question could maybe be answered with an estimate of it being a 50/50 chance. Soon to be revisited.

 

[edthecynic]

we should just have all the sex we want with anyone at any time... which is a sacrament to...

Tramp!!!!!

 

[JoeB131]

No...they didn't.....and I showed you the article from the New York Times, where they stated Nixon didn't listen to the guy....

You expect me to go through all that stuff to find something that isn't there.

There was a Southern Strategy... When the Democrats threw out the old racists in 1964, the Republicans welcomed them with open arms.

Trump just says the quiet part out loud.

 

[2aguy]

No...they didn't.....and I showed you the article from the New York Times, where they stated Nixon didn't listen to the guy....

You expect me to go through all that stuff to find something that isn't there.

There was a Southern Strategy... When the Democrats threw out the old racists in 1964, the Republicans welcomed them with open arms.

Trump just says the quiet part out loud.

You lie.....I showed you how the democrats have been lying about Nixon and how they have been lying about their own history......and trying to hide the fact that the democrat party, founded by actual slave owners, is still the racist party......

The racists stayed with the democrat party...you doofus.

The lie about dixie crats changing parties...

What happened to all those racist Dixiecrats that, according to the progressive narrative, all picked up their tents and moved from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party? Actually, they exist only in the progressive imagination.

This is the world not as it is but as progressives wish it to be. Of all the Dixiecrats who broke away from the Democratic Party in 1948, of all the bigots and segregationists who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, I count just two—one in the Senate and one in the House—who switched from Democrat to Republican.

In the Senate, that solitary figure was Strom Thurmond. In the House, Albert Watson. The constellation of racist Dixiecrats includes Senators William Murray, Thomas P. Gore, Spessard Holland, Sam Ervin, Russell Long, Robert Byrd, Richard Russell, Olin Johnston, Lister Hill, John C. Stennis, John Sparkman, John McClellan, James Eastland, Herman Talmadge, Herbert Walters, Harry F. Byrd, George Smathers, Everett Jordan, Allen Ellender, A. Willis Robertson, Al Gore Sr., William Fulbright, Herbert Walters, W. Kerr Scott, and Marion Price Daniels.

The list of Dixiecrat governors includes William H. Murray, Frank Dixon, Fielding Wright, and Benjamin Laney. I don’t have space to include the list of Dixiecrat congressmen and other officials. Suffice to say it is a long list. And from this entire list we count only two defections.

Thus the progressive conventional wisdom that the racist Dixiecrats became Republicans is exposed as a big lie.

The Dixiecrats remained in the Democratic Party for years, in some cases decades. Not once did the Democrats repudiate them or attempt to push them out.


Segregationists like Richard Russell and William Fulbright were lionized in their party throughout their lifetimes, as of course was Robert Byrd, who died in 2010 and was eulogized by leading Democrats and the progressive media.
https://amgreatness.com/2018/07/29/the-switch-that-never-happened-how-the-south-really-went-gop/

 

[2aguy]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

he also killed 2 white people....he was targeting sex workers....in massage parlors,

So....you are telling us that the guy who was willing to murder 10 people is all of a sudden shy about telling people why he murdered these people? That when he comes out and states to the police he didn't do it because they were Asian, but did it because he connected them to his sexual problems...you think the guy willing to murder human beings and spend his life in prison or be executed is lying about not doing it because of racism?

That is what you are saying?

 

[Flash]

View attachment 473067

um, yeah, he wasn't targeting white people. He just shot whoever happened to be around.

Long was targeting Asians.

he also killed 2 white people....he was targeting sex workers....in massage parlors,

So....you are telling us that the guy who was willing to murder 10 people is all of a sudden shy about telling people why he murdered these people? That when he comes out and states to the police he didn't do it because they were Asian, but did it because he connected them to his sexual problems...you think the guy willing to murder human beings and spend his life in prison or be executed is lying about not doing it because of racism?

That is what you are saying?

You have to remember that demented Liberals like JoeB are taught to preach racial hatred whenever they can. Racial hatred and discourse are the cornerstones of the filthy Progressive movement.

A Muslim kills ten White people and it is not a hate crime as far as they are concerned but when a White guy kills several people of which some of them are Asians then the Left will claim it is a hate crime.

You are not exactly dealing with the best and the brightest when you are trying to educate Liberals so mostly you are talking to brick wall.

 

[surada]

The GOP did not do the Southern Strategy, you have been shown over and over how that is a lie......you have been shown the New York Times story that stated Nixon did not embrace the strategy, you have been shown the election results......and yet you still choose to lie and spread the lie.

Nixon's own people have said there was a Southern Strategy.

No...he was targeting sex workers in massage parlors....had the sex workers he interacted with been Ukrainians, he would have shot them instead...

Except there's no evidence these women in their 50s, 60s and 70's were engaged in sex work.

Blacks are not nearly as well off as they were before the Great Society destroyed black families.....out of wedlock birth rates, education rates, and other factors that were going up before the mid 1960s have cratered due to the policies of the racist democrat party.

Uh, they don't have to ride on the back of the bus, there has been a growth of the black middle class since 1965.

Except there's no evidence these women in their 50s, 60s and 70's were engaged in sex work.

Robert Aaron Long was a lifetime member of Crabtree 1st Baptist Church. Of course they are horrified and have issued a statement. ... And, the Colorado shooter was a screwed up Muslim.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

The Left has no interest in debating topics regarding the evils of prostitution, immorality, or pornography. To them, if white men and Christianity disappeared, they would have their utopia.

And American patriots have no interest in defending their nation, their pride, their future or their rights.

 

[surada]

There are two angles taken by the Left o this. Really, its the only two angles they take on everything.

1. It was racism

2. It was due to his Baptist background.

In other words, it was either a result of his white racism or Christian faith, what was left of it. LOL.

The Left has no interest in debating topics regarding the evils of prostitution, immorality, or pornography. To them, if white men and Christianity disappeared, they would have their utopia.

Why would you debate prostitution or pornography? Both have been around since the dawn of history . Damn, you are childish. Robert Aaron Long was a sick dude who happened to be a Christian.. No different from a sick Muslim.

 

[JoeB131]

You lie.....I showed you how the democrats have been lying about Nixon and how they have been lying about their own history.....

Blah, blah blah. We know Nixon was a racist. We have him and Reagan on tape saying racist stuff.

So....you are telling us that the guy who was willing to murder 10 people is all of a sudden shy about telling people why he murdered these people? That when he comes out and states to the police he didn't do it because they were Asian, but did it because he connected them to his sexual problems...you think the guy willing to murder human beings and spend his life in prison or be executed is lying about not doing it because of racism?

That is what you are saying?

I'm saying that he targeted places where he could find Asians. He passed up several strip clubs with bare naked WHITE sex workers to target ASIAN women in their 50s to 70s who probably weren't. Come on, man, one of the women was 74 years old. She wasn't giving out happy endings.

 

[2aguy]

You lie.....I showed you how the democrats have been lying about Nixon and how they have been lying about their own history.....

Blah, blah blah. We know Nixon was a racist. We have him and Reagan on tape saying racist stuff.

So....you are telling us that the guy who was willing to murder 10 people is all of a sudden shy about telling people why he murdered these people? That when he comes out and states to the police he didn't do it because they were Asian, but did it because he connected them to his sexual problems...you think the guy willing to murder human beings and spend his life in prison or be executed is lying about not doing it because of racism?

That is what you are saying?

I'm saying that he targeted places where he could find Asians. He passed up several strip clubs with bare naked WHITE sex workers to target ASIAN women in their 50s to 70s who probably weren't. Come on, man, one of the women was 74 years old. She wasn't giving out happy endings.

And you know that strippers aren't the ones giving actual sex...right? That Asian massage parlors are known for sex trafficking women from Asia as sex slaves...right?

That most likely they were the places he went to to pay for sex...which is why he targeted them.....you idiot.