Democrats don't realize how stupid they look to normal people

[Crepitus]

Tha

This guy does, he's an actual person I met.

Whereas creep is not an actual person, just a hate bot from China...

Wow, the stupidity runs deep with this one^

An artificial stupidity subroutine (ASS) calling others stupid...

{
Chatbots have been skewing social-media discussions for years. About a fifth of all tweets about the 2016 presidential election were published by bots, according to one estimate, as were about a third of all tweets about that year’s Brexit vote. An Oxford Internet Institute report from last year found evidence of bots being used to spread propaganda in 50 countries. These tended to be simple programs mindlessly repeating slogans: a quarter million pro-Saudi “We all have trust in Mohammed bin Salman” tweets following the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi, for example. Detecting many bots with a few followers each is harder than detecting a few bots with lots of followers. And measuring the effectiveness of these bots is difficult. The best analyses indicate that they did not affect the 2016 U.S. presidential election. More likely, they distort people’s sense of public sentiment and their faith in reasoned political debate. We are all in the middle of a novel social experiment.}

Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It

Gee, which candidate did the intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of all the online interference?

The same ones who said they found no evidence a single vote was changed.

They were talking about direct hacking, not influencing weak minded conservatives.

 

[Nostra]

Tha

Whereas creep is not an actual person, just a hate bot from China...

Wow, the stupidity runs deep with this one^

An artificial stupidity subroutine (ASS) calling others stupid...

{
Chatbots have been skewing social-media discussions for years. About a fifth of all tweets about the 2016 presidential election were published by bots, according to one estimate, as were about a third of all tweets about that year’s Brexit vote. An Oxford Internet Institute report from last year found evidence of bots being used to spread propaganda in 50 countries. These tended to be simple programs mindlessly repeating slogans: a quarter million pro-Saudi “We all have trust in Mohammed bin Salman” tweets following the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi, for example. Detecting many bots with a few followers each is harder than detecting a few bots with lots of followers. And measuring the effectiveness of these bots is difficult. The best analyses indicate that they did not affect the 2016 U.S. presidential election. More likely, they distort people’s sense of public sentiment and their faith in reasoned political debate. We are all in the middle of a novel social experiment.}

Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It

Gee, which candidate did the intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of all the online interference?

The same ones who said they found no evidence a single vote was changed.

They were talking about direct hacking, not influencing weak minded conservatives.

Link?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Tha

Whereas creep is not an actual person, just a hate bot from China...

Wow, the stupidity runs deep with this one^

An artificial stupidity subroutine (ASS) calling others stupid...

{
Chatbots have been skewing social-media discussions for years. About a fifth of all tweets about the 2016 presidential election were published by bots, according to one estimate, as were about a third of all tweets about that year’s Brexit vote. An Oxford Internet Institute report from last year found evidence of bots being used to spread propaganda in 50 countries. These tended to be simple programs mindlessly repeating slogans: a quarter million pro-Saudi “We all have trust in Mohammed bin Salman” tweets following the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi, for example. Detecting many bots with a few followers each is harder than detecting a few bots with lots of followers. And measuring the effectiveness of these bots is difficult. The best analyses indicate that they did not affect the 2016 U.S. presidential election. More likely, they distort people’s sense of public sentiment and their faith in reasoned political debate. We are all in the middle of a novel social experiment.}

Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It

Gee, which candidate did the intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of all the online interference?

The same ones who said they found no evidence a single vote was changed.

They were talking about direct hacking, not influencing weak minded conservatives.

Don't bots like you influence brain dead leftists (redundant)?

Isn't the fraudulent impeachment purely to influence voters and corrupt our election?

 

[Crepitus]

Tha

Wow, the stupidity runs deep with this one^

An artificial stupidity subroutine (ASS) calling others stupid...

{
Chatbots have been skewing social-media discussions for years. About a fifth of all tweets about the 2016 presidential election were published by bots, according to one estimate, as were about a third of all tweets about that year’s Brexit vote. An Oxford Internet Institute report from last year found evidence of bots being used to spread propaganda in 50 countries. These tended to be simple programs mindlessly repeating slogans: a quarter million pro-Saudi “We all have trust in Mohammed bin Salman” tweets following the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi, for example. Detecting many bots with a few followers each is harder than detecting a few bots with lots of followers. And measuring the effectiveness of these bots is difficult. The best analyses indicate that they did not affect the 2016 U.S. presidential election. More likely, they distort people’s sense of public sentiment and their faith in reasoned political debate. We are all in the middle of a novel social experiment.}

Bots Are Destroying Political Discourse As We Know It

Gee, which candidate did the intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of all the online interference?

The same ones who said they found no evidence a single vote was changed.

They were talking about direct hacking, not influencing weak minded conservatives.

Don't bots like you influence brain dead leftists (redundant)?

Isn't the fraudulent impeachment purely to influence voters and corrupt our election?

No.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Democrats don't realize how stupid they look to normal people

You're right. Neither do many conservatives.

 

[P@triot]

Gee, which candidate did the intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of all the online interference?

Yeah Crep...which candidate did intelligence services determine was the beneficiary of interference?

(Hint: they made public statements claiming not a shred of evidence exists that foreign elements interfered in a way that helped Donald Trump).

Incidentally, extremely left-wing Facebook conducted a thorough investigation on their platform and found that there was as many pro-Hillary ads from Russia as there were pro-Trump. Oops.

* Note the difference between my posts and Creps is that mine have links proving actual facts while Crep just spouts off with pure made up bullshit