- Feb 22, 2017
- 108,477
- 37,575
- 2,290
Don’t need oneWow Adam shit head looks pissed
Elections have consequences
53-47
Republicans 1
Democrats 0
Then it did not happen and you are just lying about it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t need oneWow Adam shit head looks pissed
Elections have consequences
53-47
Republicans 1
Democrats 0
Now your quoting hearsay.Because the phone call was released and the witness said he was under no pressure.. move onYou forgot the part where he was about to investigate bursimiaNo we heard joe Biden tell us what he did with our money, and Obama
Yeah. I did too. They got rid of a corrupt prosecutor in a country we were helping financially.
Now, the question is what Trump was doing. You don’t want to know. Scared of what you’ll find?
I don’t include your fantasies in my posts. The only ones that believe he was “about” to investigate Burisma are hopelessly gullible.
Why don’t you want to hear from the witnesses?
Now your quoting hearsay.Because the phone call was released and the witness said he was under no pressure.. move onYou forgot the part where he was about to investigate bursimiaYeah. I did too. They got rid of a corrupt prosecutor in a country we were helping financially.
Now, the question is what Trump was doing. You don’t want to know. Scared of what you’ll find?
I don’t include your fantasies in my posts. The only ones that believe he was “about” to investigate Burisma are hopelessly gullible.
Why don’t you want to hear from the witnesses?
Now your quoting hearsay.Because the phone call was released and the witness said he was under no pressure.. move onYou forgot the part where he was about to investigate bursimia
I don’t include your fantasies in my posts. The only ones that believe he was “about” to investigate Burisma are hopelessly gullible.
Why don’t you want to hear from the witnesses?
I didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
Allow me to introduce you to American justice. You are innocent until proven guilty. It's on you and your ilk to prove Trump guilty. To date, that hasn't happened. Accusations and innuendo isn't proof. You are going to need more than general claims of abuse of power. If that's the best you've got, why didn't you impeach Obama when he admitted that his DACA ruling was unconstitutional?No we heard joe Biden tell us what he did with our money, and ObamaYour the ignorant one, you should
Have evidence before you go
To trial
Lol moron
They’re treating you like an idiot. Telling you that you don’t need to know what your government is doing with your tax dollars in your name.
And you’re happy to be treated that way.
Yeah. I did too. They got rid of a corrupt prosecutor in a country we were helping financially.
Now, the question is what Trump was doing. You don’t want to know. Scared of what you’ll find?
Are you STILL crying because you morons rushed and didn’t do your job? Tough shit. Why didn’t you do a legitimate investigation? Oh that’s right. There’s nothing to find because you have nothing.
For someone with nothing to hide, y’all are sure desperate to prevent anything from being found.
Scared?
Now your quoting hearsay.Because the phone call was released and the witness said he was under no pressure.. move onI don’t include your fantasies in my posts. The only ones that believe he was “about” to investigate Burisma are hopelessly gullible.
Why don’t you want to hear from the witnesses?
I didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
It’s the transcript that everyone said was ok
Cool storyDon’t need oneWow Adam shit head looks pissed
Elections have consequences
53-47
Republicans 1
Democrats 0
Then it did not happen and you are just lying about it
Allow me to introduce you to American justice. You are innocent until proven guilty. It's on you and your ilk to prove Trump guilty. To date, that hasn't happened. Accusations and innuendo isn't proof. You are going to need more than general claims of abuse of power. If that's the best you've got, why didn't you impeach Obama when he admitted that his DACA ruling was unconstitutional?No we heard joe Biden tell us what he did with our money, and ObamaThey’re treating you like an idiot. Telling you that you don’t need to know what your government is doing with your tax dollars in your name.
And you’re happy to be treated that way.
Yeah. I did too. They got rid of a corrupt prosecutor in a country we were helping financially.
Now, the question is what Trump was doing. You don’t want to know. Scared of what you’ll find?
Are you STILL crying because you morons rushed and didn’t do your job? Tough shit. Why didn’t you do a legitimate investigation? Oh that’s right. There’s nothing to find because you have nothing.
For someone with nothing to hide, y’all are sure desperate to prevent anything from being found.
Scared?
Now your quoting hearsay.Because the phone call was released and the witness said he was under no pressure.. move on
I didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
It’s the transcript that everyone said was ok
It’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
Justice delayed is justice denied. The president seems to wantt to tie this up in the courts for years....Go to courtSo, this proves there are no documents in the White House that would clear Trump.
Now your quoting hearsay.
I didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
It’s the transcript that everyone said was ok
It’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lol
Your not entitled to it. Stomp your feet some more .. maybe just maybe daddy will give you what you want lolJustice delayed is justice denied. The president seems to wantt to tie this up in the courts for years....Go to courtSo, this proves there are no documents in the White House that would clear Trump.
That is justice denied.
However, in this trial, the SC, MINUS Roberts, can make rapid decisions if brought directly to them.... much like in Nixon's impeachment, the SC ruled immediately on Nixon having to release the tapes from his oval office that he claimed executive privilege....the SC ruled against Nixon. The taped conversations with the President and his admin were released. No executive privilege was allowed to be a valid claim when involved in an impeachment.
I didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
It’s the transcript that everyone said was ok
It’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lol
The transcript is hearsay. You want to use his statements in court, you call him.
Oh it’s hear say? Vinderman said under oath it wasn’t should he be in jail?Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lolIt’s the transcript that everyone said was okI didn’t see any Ukrainians in that little video clip.
When you get Zelinsky on the witness stand saying there was no pressure, then you can make that claim. Until then, it’s an out of court statement and therefore hearsay.
It’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
The transcript is hearsay. You want to use his statements in court, you call him.
Between the two presidents yesOh it’s hear say? Vinderman said under oath it wasn’t should he be in jail?Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lolIt’s the transcript that everyone said was ok
It’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
The transcript is hearsay. You want to use his statements in court, you call him.
Some hearsay is admissible under federal rules of evidence. An official record would fall under that category.
Tell me, are you so uninformed that you think the transcript of the phone call is all there is to this interaction?
Between the two presidents yesOh it’s hear say? Vinderman said under oath it wasn’t should he be in jail?Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lolIt’s a statement made by someone under duress.
Not under oath.
Not subject to cross examination.
Get Zelinsky on the stand and then you can use him as a witness.
The transcript is hearsay. You want to use his statements in court, you call him.
Some hearsay is admissible under federal rules of evidence. An official record would fall under that category.
Tell me, are you so uninformed that you think the transcript of the phone call is all there is to this interaction?
Well that hearsayBetween the two presidents yesOh it’s hear say? Vinderman said under oath it wasn’t should he be in jail?Well call him as a witness.. we have the transcript.. but ok lol
The transcript is hearsay. You want to use his statements in court, you call him.
Some hearsay is admissible under federal rules of evidence. An official record would fall under that category.
Tell me, are you so uninformed that you think the transcript of the phone call is all there is to this interaction?
Direclty, yes. But through intermediates, obviously not.
You only know a fraction of the story.