Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are witnessing another econchick melt down.
And she continues to melt down.
You have nothing, econchick, at all.
Every argument in this thread and others by you and have been easily refuted.
We are witnessing another econchick melt down.
Bush said he would not have invaded Iraq if he knew the WMDs were not there. No ifs ands or buts, no exclusions
You're the dumbest fuck on this entire board. I assure you you don't know how to interpret a sophisticated person's comments.
I put that out on the news wires, "EconChick says she is sophisticated", and we could feel the world shift on its axis as the laughter shook the cosmos
Intelligent people luvvvvvvvvvvvvv me.
I'm not surprised you don't.
Get it,get it?? LMAO
Look you're just a beached whale that no one respects or listens to.
I notice you are incapable of debating me on substance. As usual.
So Fakey, were you in the military?
See unlike you, I actually ask instead of making presumptions.
What was your rank?
It's been very entertaining to watch your deterioration. Classic!!
LOL, my threads have been brilliantly prescient. Intelligent people tell me that all the time. I'm having a ball, moron.
You're just a partisan hack the feels extremely insecure by my presence. Poor idiot.
Did you support or oppose it? Did you support "no fly zones?" Bosnia? Hati?Kosovo? We sent 150,000 American troops into Kosovo?
[
HEY IGNORANT!!!
I said you were RIGHT... THERE WERE NONE! !
Then spare me and go argue with the posters like Econchick who are still insisting there were...
So you conclude that Bush et al were every bit as wrong as the Clintonites.
The harm wrecked on the ME by us was worse than by the Arabs on themselves.
The US launched an illegal war without UN approval of its reasons or its goals.
Bush et al all are war criminals, and those who support them are we now know that WMDs as described by the bushies did not exist are conspiring to hide war crimes.
Now here is an outstanding thread. I almost thought about starting a similar one but glad you're more willing to take the time with these Obamabots, healthmyths.
When I have time I'd like to post in there. In the meantime, it's comical to watch Fakey be completely decimated for his vacuous statements on everything.
At least Not Fooled and Boo are trying to have an intelligent conversation. Fakey is just a shallow dude that lacks intelligence AND integrity.
I'd like to see one of these Obamabots prove nuke WMD was NOT moved from Iraq. We all know CHEM WMD was moved into Syria. Sarin gas is WMD and anyone still denying THAT is even dumber than the piss ants. It's all over open source.
The most the corrupt press can say about NUKE WMD is it wasn't found INSIDE Iraq. And even that becomes debatable with the 500 tons of yellowcake moved out in 2008.
That yellowcake was from before 1991 and was well accounted for and had nothing to do with claims in 2003 that Saddam was acquiring yellowcake for a nuclear program.
More proof you've never been to Iraq or in any way involved with the military or else you would have known that was a worn out thoroughly debunked myth:
snopes.com Yellowcake Uranium Removed from Iraq
So enough with the posing.
As usual you show how brainwashed you are. And darling, unlike you, I have plenty pictures that show I was there. U wanna put $2000 behind your lies too?
Don't answer that. You libs have demonstrated yourselves to be vacuous, cowardly, weasels when it comes to backing up the poop you throw out there. We already know you won't back it up.
As for the WMD, we've already resolved this in other threads.
Is sarin gas WMD or not?
One more time, is the sarin gas in Syria WMD or not? You know....the stuff Obama drew the red line for.
So one more time, is sarin gas WMD?
Don't answer, your brain isn't big enough.
But most people know it is.
As for nuke WMD, Bush only ever said it wasn't found in Iraq.
Show me where he said otherwise. And no, your libtard interpretation of what Bush said doesn't count. I want you to show me where he said an exhaustive search outside of Iraq was done.
You can't because he didn't.
And the yellowcake? You're an even bigger idiot than I thought. It's not even worth my time to educate you.
Just shut the fuck up on this subject. You're just as stupid as Fakey. No one believes what either of you say on the subject.
And she continues to melt down.
Did you support or oppose it? Did you support "no fly zones?" Bosnia? Hati?Kosovo? We sent 150,000 American troops into Kosovo?
So you conclude that Bush et al were every bit as wrong as the Clintonites.
The harm wrecked on the ME by us was worse than by the Arabs on themselves.
The US launched an illegal war without UN approval of its reasons or its goals.
Bush et al all are war criminals, and those who support them are we now know that WMDs as described by the bushies did not exist are conspiring to hide war crimes.
hm, you could write a book on the subject and be wrong.
The UN did not giv eus the right to enforce UN resolutions, which was exactly what Bush and Powell were trying to get with the later's testimony.
The senior neo-con leaders in Bush's administration cannot travel to western Europe.
They never will be without being arrested for war crimes.
hm, you could write a book on the subject and be wrong.
The UN did not giv eus the right to enforce UN resolutions, which was exactly what Bush and Powell were trying to get with the later's testimony.
The senior neo-con leaders in Bush's administration cannot travel to western Europe.
They never will be without being arrested for war crimes.
Since Obama is using the same authorization to bomb Syria that was used by George Bush, I feel very certain that you will be calling for his arrest and prosecution for war crimes as well. Am I right?
The Obama administration instead pointed to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which gives the president authority to act “against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” The administration has also cited the 2003 AUMF that authorized the president to go to war to “defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” then governed by Saddam Hussein.
The White House’s defender sargue that the 2001 AUMF gives Obama the authority he needs to fight ISIS because, while ISIS broke from al-Qaida in 2012, it is nonetheless composed of former al-Qaida members (at least in part), who have (or so it is argued by the administration) continuously conducted and sought to conduct attacks against the United States and its citizens and interests.
hm, you could write a book on the subject and be wrong.
The UN did not giv eus the right to enforce UN resolutions, which was exactly what Bush and Powell were trying to get with the later's testimony.
The senior neo-con leaders in Bush's administration cannot travel to western Europe.
They never will be without being arrested for war crimes.
Since Obama is using the same authorization to bomb Syria that was used by George Bush, I feel very certain that you will be calling for his arrest and prosecution for war crimes as well. Am I right?
The Obama administration instead pointed to the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which gives the president authority to act “against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons.” The administration has also cited the 2003 AUMF that authorized the president to go to war to “defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,” then governed by Saddam Hussein.
The White House’s defenders argue that the 2001 AUMF gives Obama the authority he needs to fight ISIS because, while ISIS broke from al-Qaida in 2012, it is nonetheless composed of former al-Qaida members (at least in part), who have (or so it is argued by the administration) continuously conducted and sought to conduct attacks against the United States and its citizens and interests.
