Trump is a man close to God. Here he is with some vestal virgins and a high priest:
That pic must have been taken in January. They look like they're preparing a circumcision.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump is a man close to God. Here he is with some vestal virgins and a high priest:
It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .At the same time, Democrats love to quote Jesus as a basis for giving most of your money to the State for redistribution. Jesus said nothing to the sort about the State as an agent for doing his mandate of redistribution of wealth.
Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
You don't have a clue what the Bible says.The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .At the same time, Democrats love to quote Jesus as a basis for giving most of your money to the State for redistribution. Jesus said nothing to the sort about the State as an agent for doing his mandate of redistribution of wealth.
Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
God is my source, not the state. That's what Jesus teaches.The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .At the same time, Democrats love to quote Jesus as a basis for giving most of your money to the State for redistribution. Jesus said nothing to the sort about the State as an agent for doing his mandate of redistribution of wealth.
Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
He never trusted The State. They nailed Him to a cross. He was Left and did not te stva Right State of the day. So if the Left of today loves the State who does not let Jesus into the schoolhouse or courthouse and the Right favors Jesus who wants Him everywhere, where would Jesus be today? My take is that he would demand redistribution of wealth yet leave or limit the State’s involvement in the process.
Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
I'm so sorry to hear that your god is so very weak.Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
Religious freedom is a Constitutional right. Do you agree?
Religious freedom does not include any right to interfere with other people's enjoyment of their freedoms, religious or other.
What is downright laughable is that you think that you are an appointed representative of a Supreme Being and that you deserve more space and attention than the rest of us do.
It's also funny that you claim to defend "religious freedom" while simultaneously arguing that the U.S. should have a motto that proclaims a specific theological conclusion as if it were universally held.
BTW: how can you tell a person's religion by what political party s/he supports? This is impossible.
Please provide the verification that he thinks he's an appointed representative of a Supreme Being who deserves more space and attention than the rest of us do?
Proclaiming *In God We Trust* does not in any way, shape, or form impede anybody's religious freedom, incidentally.
Of course it does. We have the freedom to have no religion. Go with "in God some of us trust", and you might have an accurate slogan.
Summa these wags don't seem to get that as regards national currency, national aphorisms etc, it is in the Constitution that we actually trust.
The whole "In gods we trust" song and dance is an insidious end-around to try to undermine that."Nor prohibit the free exercise thereof". You'd like to remove that from the first amendment.Religious freedom is a Constitutional right. Do you agree?
Religious freedom does not include any right to interfere with other people's enjoyment of their freedoms, religious or other.
What is downright laughable is that you think that you are an appointed representative of a Supreme Being and that you deserve more space and attention than the rest of us do.
It's also funny that you claim to defend "religious freedom" while simultaneously arguing that the U.S. should have a motto that proclaims a specific theological conclusion as if it were universally held.
BTW: how can you tell a person's religion by what political party s/he supports? This is impossible.
Please provide the verification that he thinks he's an appointed representative of a Supreme Being who deserves more space and attention than the rest of us do?
Proclaiming *In God We Trust* does not in any way, shape, or form impede anybody's religious freedom, incidentally.
Of course it does. We have the freedom to have no religion. Go with "in God some of us trust", and you might have an accurate slogan.
Summa these wags don't seem to get that as regards national currency, national aphorisms etc, it is in the Constitution that we actually trust.
The whole "In gods we trust" song and dance is an insidious end-around to try to undermine that.
The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .At the same time, Democrats love to quote Jesus as a basis for giving most of your money to the State for redistribution. Jesus said nothing to the sort about the State as an agent for doing his mandate of redistribution of wealth.
Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
He never trusted The State. They nailed Him to a cross. He was Left and did not te stva Right State of the day. So if the Left of today loves the State who does not let Jesus into the schoolhouse or courthouse and the Right favors Jesus who wants Him everywhere, where would Jesus be today? My take is that he would demand redistribution of wealth yet leave or limit the State’s involvement in the process.
What's weak is your feeble attempt at making this about God instead of the flailing demonrats.I'm so sorry to hear that your god is so very weak.Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
He never trusted The State. They nailed Him to a cross. He was Left and did not te stva Right State of the day. So if the Left of today loves the State who does not let Jesus into the schoolhouse or courthouse and the Right favors Jesus who wants Him everywhere, where would Jesus be today? My take is that he would demand redistribution of wealth yet leave or limit the State’s involvement in the process.
Again, he did not live in a democracy. We cannot say what his position would be in a modern democracy.
Y’all seem to think legislating abortion is fine, but not legislating feeding the poor?
The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ ......nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
He never trusted The State. They nailed Him to a cross. He was Left and did not te stva Right State of the day. So if the Left of today loves the State who does not let Jesus into the schoolhouse or courthouse and the Right favors Jesus who wants Him everywhere, where would Jesus be today? My take is that he would demand redistribution of wealth yet leave or limit the State’s involvement in the process.
Again, he did not live in a democracy. We cannot say what his position would be in a modern democracy.
Y’all seem to think legislating abortion is fine, but not legislating feeding the poor?
Again, Jesus still does not live in a Democracy. A democracy, just like a dictatorship, communism, or socialism is manmade. Further, Jesus mandates that I feed the poor, is measuring me daily on it, and does not give a shit as to what or how the State measured me on it. You threw abortion in to the argument. He did not weigh one way or the other on the specific act but clearly loved Life, the Church, and Children. Come Judgement Day, I’d rather rely on my track record for feeding the poor directly vs. pointing to my tax returns and support of the State as a basis for entering the Kingdom.
Funny...considering your thread title.....again, sorry your god is such a pantywaist.What's weak is your feeble attempt at making this about God instead of the flailing demonrats.I'm so sorry to hear that your god is so very weak.Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
Where did you read about Jesus?The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
He never trusted The State. They nailed Him to a cross. He was Left and did not te stva Right State of the day. So if the Left of today loves the State who does not let Jesus into the schoolhouse or courthouse and the Right favors Jesus who wants Him everywhere, where would Jesus be today? My take is that he would demand redistribution of wealth yet leave or limit the State’s involvement in the process.
Again, he did not live in a democracy. We cannot say what his position would be in a modern democracy.
Y’all seem to think legislating abortion is fine, but not legislating feeding the poor?
Again, Jesus still does not live in a Democracy. A democracy, just like a dictatorship, communism, or socialism is manmade. Further, Jesus mandates that I feed the poor, is measuring me daily on it, and does not give a shit as to what or how the State measured me on it. You threw abortion in to the argument. He did not weigh one way or the other on the specific act but clearly loved Life, the Church, and Children. Come Judgement Day, I’d rather rely on my track record for feeding the poor directly vs. pointing to my tax returns and support of the State as a basis for entering the Kingdom.
When Jesus walked the earth, he was never given the opportunity to vote for legislators that create the budget for a government so we don't know how he would feel about it. I can't imagine the Jesus I've read about supporting cuts to government aid to the poor and to children.
Lol. Poor pitiful thing.....Funny...considering your thread title.....again, sorry your god is such a pantywaist.What's weak is your feeble attempt at making this about God instead of the flailing demonrats.I'm so sorry to hear that your god is so very weak.Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history
You don't have a clue what the Bible says.The Jesus of the left is a socialist queer, not the Biblical God in the flesh, the Christ .At the same time, Democrats love to quote Jesus as a basis for giving most of your money to the State for redistribution. Jesus said nothing to the sort about the State as an agent for doing his mandate of redistribution of wealth.
Jesus never lived in a democracy.
.....nor does He live in one now. Democrats can’t stand any symbol or reference to Jesus in the public square yet they are now convinced Jesus entrusts the State to do Christs’ work??
The Jesus of the Bible is far more “left” than an American evangelical.
Funny...considering your thread title.....again, sorry your god is such a pantywaist.What's weak is your feeble attempt at making this about God instead of the flailing demonrats.I'm so sorry to hear that your god is so very weak.Democrats are losing, badly. I wouldn't be surprised to see Minnesota turn red like Wisconsin did.Oh dear....is your god losing?It's no wonder democrats are accused of being communists.
Minnesota Democrats wage war on God, faith and American history