democrats will keep trying to grab guns...they never, ever stop....

[PredFan]

This:

 

[Esmeralda]

And since this video was in 1989 and we actually have research that shows Reagan was uninformed on the topic.......had he been presented with what we know now he would have changed his mind......considering he was a rational person....

And considering that gun murders with long guns of any kind...let alone an AK-47 semi auto rifle.....are 1/3 the deaths of people murdered with hands and feet.....or knives.......yeah....he would have changed his mind......

 

[rdean]

Republicans want to give bazooka's to deranged crazies. Democrats want to make sure the gun rights of responsible Americans are protected.
That's the difference.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

There is no doubt, anytime new gun laws are proposed restricting gun rights, or simply making it more difficult to own guns, it's always going to be Dimocrats that push for them.

 

[Brain357]

There is no doubt, anytime new gun laws are proposed restricting gun rights, or simply making it more difficult to own guns, it's always going to be Dimocrats that push for them.

Well republicans are owned by the nra. So unless they give the ok...

 

[BULLDOG]

Which one of those will grab your guns? We have insurance for cars, and smart phones, but neither has grabbed anybody's car or phone.

Only an idiot would compare guns and phones.
Besides,the gov wants you to have a cell phone. How else are they going to track you and gather information on you?

I thought you said they were tracking you long before cell phones. Isn't that why you wear that stylish tinfoil hat?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Unlike liberals, thinking people do not agree with something just because a certain someone said it.
Congrats on another fail.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Republicans want to give bazooka's to deranged crazies. Democrats want to make sure the gun rights of responsible Americans are protected.

1 post, two lies.
Very nice.

 

[2aguy]

Republicans want to give bazooka's to deranged crazies. Democrats want to make sure the gun rights of responsible Americans are protected.
That's the difference.

No...democrats will ban guns as soon as they can get the political cover to do it...usually after kids are killed......they are like vultures sitting on a cactus in those old cartoons.....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Which one of those will grab your guns? We have insurance for cars, and smart phones, but neither has grabbed anybody's car or phone.

Only an idiot would compare guns and phones.
Besides,the gov wants you to have a cell phone. How else are they going to track you and gather information on you?

I thought you said they were tracking you long before cell phones. Isn't that why you wear that stylish tinfoil hat?

Of course you dont know shit. How about you show where i said that?

 

[prison/con.net]

There's 300 million guns that are KNOWN to gov't. Guns work just fine for centuries. So making ALL new guns be smart guns won't change ANYTHING for many decades. Smart guns can't be fired by anyone but their owner, so you can't teach anyone to shoot with your gun. That's the REAL reason that anti-gunners want smart guns. You can't teach your GF, Wife, or kids to love shootinng/hunting. Do you see? in a couple of generations, the kids will surrender your "old style dumb" guns when you're not looking.

 

[M14 Shooter]

There's 300 million guns that are KNOWN to gov't. Guns work just fine for centuries. So making ALL new guns be smart guns won't change ANYTHING for many decades. Smart guns can't be fired by anyone but their owner, so you can't teach anyone to shoot with your gun. That's the REAL reason that anti-gunners want smart guns. You can't teach your GF, Wife, or kids to love shootinng/hunting. Do you see? in a couple of generations, the kids will surrender your "old style dumb" guns when you're not looking.

Never mind that s smart gun will not keep a criminal from using it, once he disables the mechanical interface.

 

[prison/con.net]

Jefferson said that "the price of liberty is ETERNAL vigilance". Caps mine. We just dont let the dems succeed, that's all. We have the guns, they have nothing, basically. So, only if we wimp out can they succeed.

 

[prison/con.net]

Never mind that, my BUTT! This is Fabian socialism, getting what they want over a century of nibbling away, with mutts like you not understanding/caring what's at risk.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I'm sure, since Esmerelda is a Reagan fan, she'll swoon over this:

As long as there are guns, the individual that wants a gun for a crime is going to have one and going to get it. The only person who’s going to be penalized and have difficulty is the law-abiding citizen, who then cannot have [it] if he wants protection -- the protection of a weapon in his home.
RONALD REAGAN, interview, Mar. 22, 1986

 

[BULLDOG]

Which one of those will grab your guns? We have insurance for cars, and smart phones, but neither has grabbed anybody's car or phone.

Only an idiot would compare guns and phones.
Besides,the gov wants you to have a cell phone. How else are they going to track you and gather information on you?

I thought you said they were tracking you long before cell phones. Isn't that why you wear that stylish tinfoil hat?

Of course you dont know shit. How about you show where i said that?

No need. A quick glance at your posts shows that you and Exidor could be BFFs

 

[2aguy]

And here is a good explanation...

Gun insurance protects criminals


This might make sense in a perfect world. But, as gun grabbers don’t seem to realize, our world is far from perfect. Good, honest people are less likely to commit violent crime, and bad people, i.e. criminals, are less likely to obey laws. Accidents are far less frequent than crimes, and criminals aren’t going to bother paying for insurance when they can simply buy a gun off the street (or use a knife instead).

Even if they wanted to follow such a law, could they really afford it? Most gun violence occurs in low-income neighborhoods. Why would someone who can barely afford necessities want to buy “gun insurance”?

The people who would be most adversely affected by this legislation are the law-abiding citizens who can’t afford gun liability insurance. According to theAmerican Firearms Institute, “persons with annual household incomes of less than $7,500 experienced both armed violence and firearm violence at about three times the rates of persons with annual household incomes of $50,000 or more.”

Does Maloney have no concern for the economically disadvantaged? This bill would stand in the way of their Second Amendment rights, and could mean these people lose the only form of protection they have at their disposal.

 

[M14 Shooter]

There's one thing, and only one thing that keeps Democrats from enacting further restrictions the RKBA: Their fear of political fallout
As soon as they believe they are safe from that, those restrictions will pass into law faster than an anti-gun loon can blame the NRA for a school shooting.

Fortunately there are two powerful forces on the pro-freedom side: the NRA and the US constitution.
Of course, the anti-gun loons don't care about the constitution and would ban the NRA if they could, so we must remain vigilant.

 

[2aguy]

So the asshat fake indian will ban all guns without smart gun technology when they get the chance......

Fanciful Smart Gun Bill Seeks To Make Law Out Of Wishful Thinking The Daily Caller

In brief, the bill would federally fund development of so-called “personalized handguns” and prohibit the manufacture of any other type of handgun five years after the bill’s enactment date. Not only would the technology have to recognize “lawful owners” and others who they authorize to use their handguns, it would have to be able further to distinguish who is “authorized, under the law of the State where the firearm is being used, to own, carry, or use a firearm in the State.”

Yes....try to tell me again that these asshats don't want to ban guns.......

Read more: Fanciful Smart Gun Bill Seeks To Make Law Out Of Wishful Thinking The Daily Caller

 

[LoneLaugher]

You want a gun....fine. Take responsibility for it. Ya fucking losers.

Insurance makes perfect sense.

My car has a push-button ignition and a no-key entry. All I have to do is have the key fob on my person and the door opens at the touch of a finger.

That technology would be great for guns.

Most of the "democrats" here own firearms, assholes.