Dems demanding longer unemployment coverage

A popular Dem demand, coming back in the ongoing budget negotiations. They want to continue to fund unemployment benefits for ever longer periods. The "reasoning" here is that unemployment insurance is a stimulus.
So we're being asked to believe that paying people not to work will result in more people working.
ANyone else think there's a problem here?

wouldn't it be more practical for them to help create more jobs instead? which is what they promised to do in the first place. or is this their way of saying they really can't create more jobs and just lied to get themselves elected?
 
A popular Dem demand, coming back in the ongoing budget negotiations. They want to continue to fund unemployment benefits for ever longer periods. The "reasoning" here is that unemployment insurance is a stimulus.
So we're being asked to believe that paying people not to work will result in more people working.
ANyone else think there's a problem here?

wouldn't it be more practical for them to help create more jobs instead? which is what they promised to do in the first place. or is this their way of saying they really can't create more jobs and just lied to get themselves elected?

bingo, but unfortunately their base of voters fall for their continuing lies
 
They are going to create more jobs by getting your insurance canceled, doubling the minimum wage and extending free money....er unemployment

This shit is just mind boggling
 
Good.

Thanks to Republican/Conservative policies, it's taking much longer to find a job.

That "trickle thing" was a fucking disaster.

Californias rate is 8.7% i believe right now.....here in "Conservative heavy Orange County" a term coined by Truth Matters....it is 5.8 %....so how does that fit in with what you just said?....
 
Last edited:
A popular Dem demand, coming back in the ongoing budget negotiations. They want to continue to fund unemployment benefits for ever longer periods. The "reasoning" here is that unemployment insurance is a stimulus.
So we're being asked to believe that paying people not to work will result in more people working.
ANyone else think there's a problem here?

No originality from the Dumbocratic party....what a shock.
Next, they'll want to increase taxes again.
 
A popular Dem demand, coming back in the ongoing budget negotiations. They want to continue to fund unemployment benefits for ever longer periods. The "reasoning" here is that unemployment insurance is a stimulus.
So we're being asked to believe that paying people not to work will result in more people working.
ANyone else think there's a problem here?

Of course they are an election is up coming and they need those people to come out and vote for their free government money, because the far left does not want real job creation in this country they want all the serf's to follow and worship the far left.
 
By the way, Jobs were created by the "great" Ronald Reagan by spending us into oblivion and one of the biggest tax hikes in history.
Why is it that Reagan could but Obama couldn't?

Reagan was not spending the country in oblivion like Obama. Reagan had a budget and had to ask Congress for more money (the house was controlled by the far left). Unlike Obama who says, "Budget? We don't need no stinking Budget". Even when the far left was in total control of the government.
 
Thanks to Republican/Conservative policies, it's taking much longer to find a job.

That "trickle thing" was a fucking disaster.

wow, the new DNC talking point?


for sure we need Guberment to give and assign people jobs in this country...trickle up

Don't worry. We can all get jobs from "the poor" people. They are going to start hiring any day now...
 
We need the GOP to move forward with a realistic jobs bill and we need the Dems to stop whining about extended unemployment benefits.
 
Democrats would like lifetime unemployment coverage. Starting at graduation.

At birth. Utopia is 'The Matrix'.

And you post this after the Bush administration gave us the "Patriot Act", the Department of Homeland Security, "Enhanced Interrogation" and the Authorization to Use Military Force.

:itsok:

All that shit REALLY DID TAKE AWAY your liberties.

But it took Obama and the Democrats to prove just badly those could be abused by the Government..
 
Last edited:
We need the GOP to move forward with a realistic jobs bill and we need the Dems to stop whining about extended unemployment benefits.

The first part of your statement has already happened, the problem is Reid tabled all those in the senate so there will be no vote. Please understand it is your side (the far left) that is hampering real job growth.
 
We need the GOP to move forward with a realistic jobs bill and we need the Dems to stop whining about extended unemployment benefits.

The first part of your statement has already happened, the problem is Reid tabled all those in the senate so there will be no vote. Please understand it is your side (the far left) that is hampering real job growth.

Kosh, stop it now.

No, we did not. ACA is law and not going anywhere except forward.

The sooner we accept that, the better we can campaign in 2014 for the GOP.
 
A popular Dem demand, coming back in the ongoing budget negotiations. They want to continue to fund unemployment benefits for ever longer periods. The "reasoning" here is that unemployment insurance is a stimulus.
So we're being asked to believe that paying people not to work will result in more people working.
ANyone else think there's a problem here?

Only for those witha lick of common sense Rabbi!! do they realize how many will be TRYING to become unemployed with an excuse just inside the line for U E B!!:cuckoo::eek:
 
We need the GOP to move forward with a realistic jobs bill and we need the Dems to stop whining about extended unemployment benefits.

The first part of your statement has already happened, the problem is Reid tabled all those in the senate so there will be no vote. Please understand it is your side (the far left) that is hampering real job growth.

Kosh, stop it now.

No, we did not. ACA is law and not going anywhere except forward.

The sooner we accept that, the better we can campaign in 2014 for the GOP.

Will we get IMPEACHMENT going for OVOMIT, Reid, Pissloosi and the Girly Boy trio of Bide, Durbin & Shumer??? Lets see I called for 4 White Guys and a White Woman, but I'll be Racist for the Token Negro, I spect????
 
The first part of your statement has already happened, the problem is Reid tabled all those in the senate so there will be no vote. Please understand it is your side (the far left) that is hampering real job growth.

Kosh, stop it now.

No, we did not. ACA is law and not going anywhere except forward.

The sooner we accept that, the better we can campaign in 2014 for the GOP.

Will we get IMPEACHMENT going for OVOMIT, Reid, Pissloosi and the Girly Boy trio of Bide, Durbin & Shumer??? Lets see I called for 4 White Guys and a White Woman, but I'll be Racist for the Token Negro, I spect????

I 'spect you are not seeing very clearly at the moment.
 
Republicans helped corporations move millions of jobs to China. Those jobs simply don't exist anymore. Now, they say "let him die". Their "final" solution.
 
We need the GOP to move forward with a realistic jobs bill and we need the Dems to stop whining about extended unemployment benefits.

The first part of your statement has already happened, the problem is Reid tabled all those in the senate so there will be no vote. Please understand it is your side (the far left) that is hampering real job growth.

Kosh, stop it now.

No, we did not. ACA is law and not going anywhere except forward.

The sooner we accept that, the better we can campaign in 2014 for the GOP.

If you choose to still believe in the far left religion even though it has been debunked then that is your choice, a wrong choice at that.
 
Republicans helped corporations move millions of jobs to China. Those jobs simply don't exist anymore. Now, they say "let him die". Their "final" solution.

More far left propaganda.

While questions regarding the U.S. Democratic Party's fund-raising activities first arose over a Los Angeles Times article published on September 21, 1996,[1] China's alleged role in the affair first gained public attention when Bob Woodward and Brian Duffy of The Washington Post published a story stating that a United States Department of Justice investigation into the fund-raising activities had uncovered evidence that agents of China sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign.

1996 United States campaign finance controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Republicans helped corporations move millions of jobs to China. Those jobs simply don't exist anymore. Now, they say "let him die". Their "final" solution.

But why did those corporations move those jobs to China?
-Costly/unnecessary regulations
-the high corporate tax rate
 

Forum List

Back
Top