Dems kill God

Oh please as if Americans even believe in God, in America you can do porn and still be a God living Christian, Unbeliavnle
 
It was a PUNISHMENT because Pharaoh would not allow the Jews to leave Egypt. It took that and a whole lot more to get Pharaoh to realize the error of his ways.

Wow, so he takes the lives of innocent babies to prove a point? Nice guy...not....

Evidently you lack the cranial capacity to understand that the punishment meted out to Pharaoh and his people was the SAME punishment that Pharaoh pronounced on the Israelites.

Matthew 7:1“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

Is it becoming clearer for you?

Oh, so two wrongs do make a right.
And there is no turning the other cheek?
And so he took himself down to their level?

Got it....:thup::thup::thup::thup:
 
Wow, so he takes the lives of innocent babies to prove a point? Nice guy...not....

Evidently you lack the cranial capacity to understand that the punishment meted out to Pharaoh and his people was the SAME punishment that Pharaoh pronounced on the Israelites.

Matthew 7:1“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

Is it becoming clearer for you?

Oh, so two wrongs do make a right.
And there is no turning the other cheek?
And so he took himself down to their level?

Got it....:thup::thup::thup::thup:

Justice for the unjust,

Mercy for the merciful.
 
Evidently you lack the cranial capacity to understand that the punishment meted out to Pharaoh and his people was the SAME punishment that Pharaoh pronounced on the Israelites.

Matthew 7:1“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

Is it becoming clearer for you?

Oh, so two wrongs do make a right.
And there is no turning the other cheek?
And so he took himself down to their level?

Got it....:thup::thup::thup::thup:

Justice for the unjust,

Mercy for the merciful.

And the beat goes on....
 
Which God? There are thousands...

There are no Gods mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.

Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli clearly states that the U.S. was not founded on the Christian religion.

Therefore, what's your point?


Despite the secular nature of our national government, there is one unambiguous reference to Christ in the Constitution. Article VII dates the Constitution in "the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven."
"The Year of Our Lord" and separation.

No, that's actually a reference to the dating of the calendar based on the birthday of Jesus of Nazareth,

a mortal human. Not a God.
 
1 Samuel 15:3:

God, to the Israelites:

'Now go and strike Amalek and utterly destroy all that he has, and do not spare him; but put to death both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.'"

Case closed.
 
Sure, that's why he's called "Our Lord".

I like to see how far bigots are willing to contort in order to subvert liberty.
 
Christ was pro-choice on abortion; we have no evidence to the contrary.

To arbitrarily proclaim that Jesus Christ support the criminalization of abortion is the purest of baseless speculations.

And profoundly irrelevant to the conduct of our federal government.
 
Christ was pro-choice on abortion; we have no evidence to the contrary.

To arbitrarily proclaim that Jesus Christ support the criminalization of abortion is the purest of baseless speculations.

And profoundly irrelevant to the conduct of our federal government.

Did you really just type that?? Really?? O.M.G.
 
Christ was pro-choice on abortion; we have no evidence to the contrary.

To arbitrarily proclaim that Jesus Christ support the criminalization of abortion is the purest of baseless speculations.

And profoundly irrelevant to the conduct of our federal government.

Did you really just type that?? Really?? O.M.G.

Then produce the evidence to the contrary.

You cannot logically deem some anti-abortion when you know nothing about that person's actual position on abortion,

just because you want that person to be anti-abortion.
 
The belief in a just God would naturally conflict with their chosen religion... Collectivism, in all its forms. Their god requires the blood sacrifice of babies and old people. We're talking about people who espouse positions so extreme as to demand tax-payer funded abortion right up to the 9th month of gestation or to put an unelected board of 15 between the elderly and life-sustaining healthcare. A Judeo-Christian God would naturally judge those things as evil. Therefore, they close the door on God.

Oooookay, and this is where the funditards take the Crazy-Train to insane town.

Besides the fact the bible says nothing about abortion and in fact thinks causing the termination of a pregnancy is only worth a fine (Exodus 21:22-23), we once again get into the repeatedly debunked bullshit about "Death Panels".

There are indeed Death Panels. But they are in the private insurance companies you TOOLS defend.
 
Christ was pro-choice on abortion; we have no evidence to the contrary.

To arbitrarily proclaim that Jesus Christ support the criminalization of abortion is the purest of baseless speculations.

And profoundly irrelevant to the conduct of our federal government.

I mean hell... he supported killing of actual babies out of their mothers womb... why wouldn't he support abortion? Bible is all about killing of children.


Oh and... abortion... good enough for infidelity, but not good enough for rape I suppose.

Numbers 5:11-21

11 Then the Lord said to Moses, 12 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘If a man’s wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him 13 so that another man has sexual relations with her, and this is hidden from her husband and her impurity is undetected (since there is no witness against her and she has not been caught in the act), 14 and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure—or if he is jealous and suspects her even though she is not impure— 15 then he is to take his wife to the priest. He must also take an offering of a tenth of an ephah[a] of barley flour on her behalf. He must not pour olive oil on it or put incense on it, because it is a grain offering for jealousy, a reminder-offering to draw attention to wrongdoing.

16 “‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water. 18 After the priest has had the woman stand before the Lord, he shall loosen her hair and place in her hands the reminder-offering, the grain offering for jealousy, while he himself holds the bitter water that brings a curse. 19 Then the priest shall put the woman under oath and say to her, “If no other man has had sexual relations with you and you have not gone astray and become impure while married to your husband, may this bitter water that brings a curse not harm you. 20 But if you have gone astray while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell.



Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them. But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey. (1 Samuel 15:3 )
 
Last edited:
.

Well anyway, aside from all this thread's scripture-quoting and personal insulting, I wonder if the GOP will be successful in getting any mileage out of this one. Certainly they're gonna try.

I guess the question is, do the undecideds care about this, and how would we know?

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top