Dershowitz: Recommended substantial sentence for Cohen bad news for Mueller

Alan Dershowitz: Recommended 'substantial' sentence for Michael Cohen bad news for Robert Mueller

Yep. Either Mueller and his angry democrats are LYING about how much help Cohen has been OR they want him to lie to get a lighter sentence since quite a few people they have railroaded are saying the Mueller clowns are wanting people to say things that aren't true to get President Trump.


View attachment 233629
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Alan Dershowitz: Recommended 'substantial' sentence for Michael Cohen bad news for Robert Mueller

Yep. Either Mueller and his angry democrats are LYING about how much help Cohen has been OR they want him to lie to get a lighter sentence since quite a few people they have railroaded are saying the Mueller clowns are wanting people to say things that aren't true to get President Trump.


View attachment 233629
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
 
When is Dershowitz going to admit that Congress has no choice but to impeach Trump?

WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations
 
When is Dershowitz going to admit that Congress has no choice but to impeach Trump?

WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Just because proven liar Cohen plead guilty to something doesn't mean that Trump is guilty, does it? Trump has many ways around those bullshit campaign finance "violations". Remember, Trump does not subscribe to double-standard most GOP clowns allow. If Edwards, Obama, and other dems got around those bullshit campaign violations Trump will also. Cohen is damaged goods, whatever he composed to lighten his sentence is totally useless.

p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...
 
p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...


In short, fuckheads.....like you.......would vote for a criminal to subvert the law because you're a moronic cult member.........What an IDIOT........LOL
 
Alan Dershowitz: Recommended 'substantial' sentence for Michael Cohen bad news for Robert Mueller

Yep. Either Mueller and his angry democrats are LYING about how much help Cohen has been OR they want him to lie to get a lighter sentence since quite a few people they have railroaded are saying the Mueller clowns are wanting people to say things that aren't true to get President Trump.


View attachment 233629
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Alan Dershowitz: Recommended 'substantial' sentence for Michael Cohen bad news for Robert Mueller

Yep. Either Mueller and his angry democrats are LYING about how much help Cohen has been OR they want him to lie to get a lighter sentence since quite a few people they have railroaded are saying the Mueller clowns are wanting people to say things that aren't true to get President Trump.


View attachment 233629
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.
 
When is Dershowitz going to admit that Congress has no choice but to impeach Trump?

WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Just because proven liar Cohen plead guilty to something doesn't mean that Trump is guilty, does it? Trump has many ways around those bullshit campaign finance "violations". Remember, Trump does not subscribe to double-standard most GOP clowns allow. If Edwards, Obama, and other dems got around those bullshit campaign violations Trump will also. Cohen is damaged goods, whatever he composed to lighten his sentence is totally useless.

p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...
Another dopey fallacy.
Just because Cohen previously lied does not mean he is now. Just as with Manafort, his plea agreement is only as good as the information provided. That means it must be verifiable. So when the prosecutor files court documents saying Cohen named Trump as a co-conspirator, that has already been corroborated.


I doubt Trump would win in 2020 or even run.
There aren't enough die-hard morons who are willing to vote a second time for a guy who committed fraud in the first go around.

Don't forget, this is most certainly not the last thing we will learn about Trump and his people. It's only the latest.
 
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
 
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Just like people believe in Santa Claus,people that believe in Mueller coming up with anything that will actually take down President Trump are living in fantasy land.

Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
ROFL! Once again, you proved exactly nothing. You simply restated your original bogus moronic premise. Show us where a plea bargain has been used as evidence in another trial.
 
When is Dershowitz going to admit that Congress has no choice but to impeach Trump?

WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Just because proven liar Cohen plead guilty to something doesn't mean that Trump is guilty, does it? Trump has many ways around those bullshit campaign finance "violations". Remember, Trump does not subscribe to double-standard most GOP clowns allow. If Edwards, Obama, and other dems got around those bullshit campaign violations Trump will also. Cohen is damaged goods, whatever he composed to lighten his sentence is totally useless.

p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...
Another dopey fallacy.
Just because Cohen previously lied does not mean he is now. Just as with Manafort, his plea agreement is only as good as the information provided. That means it must be verifiable. So when the prosecutor files court documents saying Cohen named Trump as a co-conspirator, that has already been corroborated.


I doubt Trump would win in 2020 or even run.
There aren't enough die-hard morons who are willing to vote a second time for a guy who committed fraud in the first go around.

Don't forget, this is most certainly not the last thing we will learn about Trump and his people. It's only the latest.

1. Dershowitz says hush money is not a crime. It wasn't a crime for Edwards nor for Obama. The DOJ (Barr) can take that one off the table.
Dershowitz: Candidate Entitled To Pay Hush Money, Committed No Election Crime

2. You're assuming that some type of corroboration exists, and that it can't be put under attorney-client privilege. I recall when a judge spanked the prosecutors for violating atty/client.

3. Trump is a shoo-in for 2020, the dems have no one to put up. Besides, what "fraud" are you talking about? By 2020 the "bullshit investigation" will be long forgotten...
 
Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Like believing that somehow it's not as bad for Cohen or Trump as it looks?

That sort of fantasy?

Cohen is going to do hard time because he committed serious crimes. His cooperation will only mitigate his sentence. Not eliminate it.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
ROFL! Once again, you proved exactly nothing. You simply restated your original bogus moronic premise. Show us where a plea bargain has been used as evidence in another trial.

You are a truly retarded little monkey.:piss2:

We just went through this with Manafort, dope.

Paul Manafort breached plea deal by repeatedly lying in Russia inquiry, Mueller says
 
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.
Oh its bad for the Convicted liar of course. For Trump? No,he did nothing wrong so. Cohen was either NOT believed by Mueller OR they are trying to convince him to lie MORE and tell them what they want to hear which seems to be a theme with the Mueller clowns in return for a lighter sentence.

Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
ROFL! Once again, you proved exactly nothing. You simply restated your original bogus moronic premise. Show us where a plea bargain has been used as evidence in another trial.

You are a truly retarded little monkey.:piss2:

We just went through this with Manafort, dope.

Paul Manafort breached plea deal by repeatedly lying in Russia inquiry, Mueller says
Your evidence is that Manafort breached the deal?

You are a special kind of moron.
 
When is Dershowitz going to admit that Congress has no choice but to impeach Trump?

WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Just because proven liar Cohen plead guilty to something doesn't mean that Trump is guilty, does it? Trump has many ways around those bullshit campaign finance "violations". Remember, Trump does not subscribe to double-standard most GOP clowns allow. If Edwards, Obama, and other dems got around those bullshit campaign violations Trump will also. Cohen is damaged goods, whatever he composed to lighten his sentence is totally useless.

p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...
Another dopey fallacy.
Just because Cohen previously lied does not mean he is now. Just as with Manafort, his plea agreement is only as good as the information provided. That means it must be verifiable. So when the prosecutor files court documents saying Cohen named Trump as a co-conspirator, that has already been corroborated.


I doubt Trump would win in 2020 or even run.
There aren't enough die-hard morons who are willing to vote a second time for a guy who committed fraud in the first go around.

Don't forget, this is most certainly not the last thing we will learn about Trump and his people. It's only the latest.

1. Dershowitz says hush money is not a crime. It wasn't a crime for Edwards nor for Obama. The DOJ (Barr) can take that one off the table.
Dershowitz: Candidate Entitled To Pay Hush Money, Committed No Election Crime

2. You're assuming that some type of corroboration exists, and that it can't be put under attorney-client privilege. I recall when a judge spanked the prosecutors for violating atty/client.

3. Trump is a shoo-in for 2020, the dems have no one to put up. Besides, what "fraud" are you talking about? By 2020 the "bullshit investigation" will be long forgotten...

Dershowitz is not prosecuting this case and has no inside information.

Cohen has already pleaded guilty, is already convicted and is awaiting sentencing, dope.
It's already a done deal.

I find it hilarious that you believe you know better than the US Attorneys prosecuting the case.
 
Of course that is logically retarded, wishful thinking.

Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator. Cohen has said that Trump directed him to make those payments knowingly in violation of the law. That means if Cohen is going to prison, in part over those payments, then Trump has the very same legal exposure as Cohen.
The payment is the only offense we know Trump was directly involved with so far. There could be several more.

There isn't any way of weasling around those facts.
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
ROFL! Once again, you proved exactly nothing. You simply restated your original bogus moronic premise. Show us where a plea bargain has been used as evidence in another trial.

You are a truly retarded little monkey.:piss2:

We just went through this with Manafort, dope.

Paul Manafort breached plea deal by repeatedly lying in Russia inquiry, Mueller says
Your evidence is that Manafort breached the deal?

You are a special kind of moron.

Read the link, dope.
 
Morons like this Trump ass licker above, "forget" the raid of Cohen's office and home where TONS of documents and tapes were screened and soon available for everyone to see..........As if Mueller gives a flying fuck what happens to crooked Cohen......LOL
and what exactly are in those documents/etc??
 
Wrong, dumbass. A plea bargain is evidence of nothing. It is not admissible as evidence in any other court proceeding.

Look, another moron!

Cohen is already convicted, dope. He is awaiting sentencing.
A plea bargain, by definition, means a guilty plea combined with some other cooperation in exchange for leniency in sentencing. Usually testimony. So to say it's not admissable in any other proceeding is just dumb as shit.
ROFL! Once again, you proved exactly nothing. You simply restated your original bogus moronic premise. Show us where a plea bargain has been used as evidence in another trial.

You are a truly retarded little monkey.:piss2:

We just went through this with Manafort, dope.

Paul Manafort breached plea deal by repeatedly lying in Russia inquiry, Mueller says
Your evidence is that Manafort breached the deal?

You are a special kind of moron.

Read the link, dope.

How does it prove that you aren't a moron?
 
WTF are you talking about? Dershowitz said that Mueller has no case against Trump.
1. The hush money payments to the gals was LEGAL, it was Trump's money to keep them quiet for family reasons
2. The DOJ already ruled for Edwards that hush money is okay.
3. Obama had campaign finance violations and it was only a fine, not a felony
4. What "high crimes and misdemeanors" do you think Mueller has on Trump?

Why are you here pushing blatantly retarded narratives after Cohen has already plead guilty to exactly the act you claim was legal?

Catch up, dope.

Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

Just because proven liar Cohen plead guilty to something doesn't mean that Trump is guilty, does it? Trump has many ways around those bullshit campaign finance "violations". Remember, Trump does not subscribe to double-standard most GOP clowns allow. If Edwards, Obama, and other dems got around those bullshit campaign violations Trump will also. Cohen is damaged goods, whatever he composed to lighten his sentence is totally useless.

p.s. if Trump wins a 2nd term the statute of limitations makes those charges go away...
Another dopey fallacy.
Just because Cohen previously lied does not mean he is now. Just as with Manafort, his plea agreement is only as good as the information provided. That means it must be verifiable. So when the prosecutor files court documents saying Cohen named Trump as a co-conspirator, that has already been corroborated.


I doubt Trump would win in 2020 or even run.
There aren't enough die-hard morons who are willing to vote a second time for a guy who committed fraud in the first go around.

Don't forget, this is most certainly not the last thing we will learn about Trump and his people. It's only the latest.

1. Dershowitz says hush money is not a crime. It wasn't a crime for Edwards nor for Obama. The DOJ (Barr) can take that one off the table.
Dershowitz: Candidate Entitled To Pay Hush Money, Committed No Election Crime

2. You're assuming that some type of corroboration exists, and that it can't be put under attorney-client privilege. I recall when a judge spanked the prosecutors for violating atty/client.

3. Trump is a shoo-in for 2020, the dems have no one to put up. Besides, what "fraud" are you talking about? By 2020 the "bullshit investigation" will be long forgotten...

Dershowitz is not prosecuting this case and has no inside information.

Cohen has already pleaded guilty, is already convicted and is awaiting sentencing, dope.
It's already a done deal.

I find it hilarious that you believe you know better than the US Attorneys prosecuting the case.

I hope Cohen gets 50-years, that has zero to do with Trump.
Dershowitz knows the Law better than the "sovereign southern district of NY".
We'll see how this plays out won't we.
1. Will Trump be impeached? probably
2. Will Trump be removed? no
3. Will Trump be indicted? no
4. Will Trump be re-elected? probably

What US attorneys are prosecuting the case? Mueller? SouthNY?
 
Morons like this Trump ass licker above, "forget" the raid of Cohen's office and home where TONS of documents and tapes were screened and soon available for everyone to see..........As if Mueller gives a flying fuck what happens to crooked Cohen......LOL

/——/ Only the Clinton’s and Kennedy’s are allowed to pay off bimbos.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Seriously? You haven’t taken the time to read the actual indictments. Nothing pertaining to Trump. Nor are there 31. That was a conspiracy going around on Twitter
Twitter
which proved to be just that-

Edit: My bad, I was completely wrong. These aren't sealed indictments, they're sealed magistrate matters--the case numbers on the list are "mj" codes instead of "cr" codes for a criminal case. I don't see any reason right now why this would be an unusual number of such matters, or any reason to think they're related to Mueller.


I find it interesting how most of the ones on the right all say the same thing totally ignoring all facts.31 indictments' and you all say nothing there because the person who thinks for you Donald crybaby trump tells you what you think. Try looking at the facts and thinking for yourself. Starr investigated Clinton for 3 and 1/2 years to come up with he lied about getting a header. Sorry but here is your problem, Muller is known to be a very good no nonsence investigator and he is still working and keeping what he knows very close. When the final report comes out then we can all decide. Till then we just listen to all of the cry baby trump's lies daily. Last count was 6300 lies but then you have to add all the lies each day.
 
Morons like this Trump ass licker above, "forget" the raid of Cohen's office and home where TONS of documents and tapes were screened and soon available for everyone to see..........As if Mueller gives a flying fuck what happens to crooked Cohen......LOL
and what exactly are in those documents/etc??


Impatient morons will be facing a few more days of heartbreaking discoveries, like this past Friday......
 

Forum List

Back
Top