trump probably came up with that one. Monkey see, monkey do.Why do you call him meatball ron?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trump probably came up with that one. Monkey see, monkey do.Why do you call him meatball ron?
trump probably came up with that one. Monkey see, monkey do.
It's 'dogwhistle for dummies' phraseology."Consider" isn't exactly a promise.
That would be even worse."Consider" isn't exactly a promise.
DeSantis says, if elected president, he'd consider pardons for Jan. 6 offenders
Looks like DeSantis wants to also be a traitor to this country and must be rejected like we're going to reject Donald Trump!
You are such a fool. On Ignore.If DeSantis does not pardon ALL of the J6 individuals, he is working for the Deep State.
You sound like a traitor too.If DeSantis does not pardon ALL of the J6 individuals, he is working for the Deep State.
Why? They attacked the Capitol Building.With the exception of those who did physically assault any police officers, I’d pardon the lot of them.
Washington is Federal, not state.I would pardon many of them. Federal charges for trespassing? Give me a break. Those charges are political only.
Most of the people charged with significant crimes caused bodily harm and / or were part of the organized attack force that planned the use of the foolish trump supporters as a cover in their attack on the Capitol.Why? They attacked the Capitol Building.
All charges were federal charges. Washington, D.C. District of Columbia seat of the Federal Government or Federal District. Most of those people crossed state lines to commit these crimes so it would be federal crimes no matter what.Washington is Federal, not state.
It sounds like you can't tell the difference between a scientist and a snake oil salesman, an imposter and a legitimately elected POTUSYou sound like a traitor too.
Speaks volumes of your lack of character.I totally agree. In the words of Sam Elliot:
View attachment 788729
Absolutely. I am totally against a presidential candidate that run on a promise to disregard courts, juries, laws, and supports people attacking the capital. But, let's face it. We knew DeSantis was nuts when he first started going to Texas to get migrants for his protest bussing to Martha's Vineyard, as he didn't have any of his own.It sounds like you can't tell the difference between a scientist and a snake oil salesman, an imposter and a legitimately elected POTUS
Are you in favor of the First Amendment?Absolutely. I am totally against a presidential candidate that run on a promise to disregard courts, juries, laws, and supports people attacking the capital. But, let's face it. We knew DeSantis was nuts when he first started going to Texas to get migrants for his protest bussing to Martha's Vineyard, as he didn't have any of his own.
What does that have to do with it?Are you in favor of the First Amendment?
Everything to do with it, that part found in the last sentence of the amendment. "....or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."What does that have to do with it?
You think that sentence makes it right to voice your opinion, by sending a bus to another state to load up with migrants, because you don't have any, and trick them into being dumped by surprise and some resort community 1500 miles away, thinking it makes some kind of political statement? That is ludicrous. It was stupid. All normal people knew it was stupid. By in large, the American Public is not going to support somebody, that repeatedly, publicly does stupid sh#t, thinking there is some nebulous political benefit to a group of malcontents, that don't have the number to elect, even if they all voted for him (and they won't) as that half-baked idea really appealed to the fringe. You really ought to wait until elected to do stupid sh#t on purpose, so it is hard to do anything about it for 4 years. Oh, you can talk about stupid sh#t all you want, and people can blow it off, but to actually do stupid sh#t to get attention? No. You need to wait until elected to do stupid sh#t, like Donny and Joe. That way you at least get 4 years.Everything to do with it, that part found in the last sentence of the amendment. "....or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Goodness White6, are you trying to change the subject? Move the goalposts?You think that sentence makes it right to voice your opinion, by sending a bus to another state to load up with migrants, because you don't have any, and trick them into being dumped by surprise and some resort community 1500 miles away, thinking it makes some kind of political statement? That is ludicrous. It was stupid. All normal people knew it was stupid. By in large, the American Public is not going to support somebody, that repeatedly, publicly does stupid sh#t, thinking there is some nebulous political benefit to a group of malcontents, that don't have the number to elect, even if they all voted for him (and they won't) as that half-baked idea really appealed to the fringe. You really ought to wait until elected to do stupid sh#t on purpose, so it is hard to do anything about it for 4 years. Oh, you can talk about stupid sh#t all you want, and people can blow it off, but to actually do stupid sh#t to get attention? No. You need to wait until elected to do stupid sh#t, like Donny and Joe. That way you at least get 4 years.