DEVELOPING: Trump’s Legal Team Prepares to File Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith’s Case Citing Prosecutorial Misconduct

[MAGA Macho Man]

You showed up right after the russian invasion of Ukraine. You immediately took a pro-Russian/Anti-Ukrainian position. You've regularly encouraged Americans to take up arms against other Americans.

And you've called for the American president to be arrested for crimes against Russia.

You're a bad caricature, playing into all the stereotypes. You haven't been properly trained.

Sorry, Comrade......but you're not very good at this.

Nope! All false. You're a commie projectionist.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

That the purpose of this prosecution is to force Trump to withdraw his candidacy it is obvious misconduct.

 

[surada]

That the purpose of this prosecution is to force Trump to withdraw his candidacy it is obvious misconduct.

You think laws don't apply to Trump?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So does Trump have a lawyer for today's arraignment?

Does Trump's lawyer, have a lawyer for today's arraignment?

 

[IM2]

If Judge Eileen Cannon is ethical, she'll do the right thing and dismiss this travesty of prosecutorial misconduct.

DEVELOPING: Trump's Legal Team Prepares to File Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's Case Citing Prosecutorial Misconduct | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Trump’s legal team is preparing to file a motion to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case citing prosecutorial misconduct.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Not going to happen.

 

[Resnic]

Excellent argument, but I don't expect the persecution of Trump to stop.

It won't. Everytime they try and fail they immediately pivot to the other foot and try something else, when that doesn't work they try another angle. There is always some new witness or something found or something brought up.

They play the "keep throwing stuff until something sticks" and the sad part is eventually something will stick. They will get the wrong judge in the wrong place with the wrong jury and be able to find some obscure loophole or something out of context just the right way and the stars will align.

Even my best friend who is a big democrat (we stay friends because we just ignore politics and talk about what we mutually enjoy) she has said what they do to him constantly while ignoring everything else is shameful.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It won't. Everytime they try and fail they immediately pivot to the other foot and try something else, when that doesn't work they try another angle. There is always some new witness or something found or something brought up.

They play the "keep throwing stuff until something sticks" and the sad part is eventually something will stick. They will get the wrong judge in the wrong place with the wrong jury and be able to find some obscure loophole or something out of context just the right way and the stars will align.

Even my best friend who is a big democrat (we stay friends because we just ignore politics and talk about what we mutually enjoy) she has said what they do to him constantly while ignoring everything else is shameful.

The orange grifter is and his cult are a crime spree.
"WE" don't try anything,
Trump does, and it falls right into prosecutors laps.

 

[bodecea]

If Judge Eileen Cannon is ethical, she'll do the right thing and dismiss this travesty of prosecutorial misconduct.

DEVELOPING: Trump's Legal Team Prepares to File Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's Case Citing Prosecutorial Misconduct | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Trump’s legal team is preparing to file a motion to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case citing prosecutorial misconduct.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Well Well Well....and so it continues:

The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[34]

Founded by Jim Hoft in 2004, The Gateway Pundit expanded from a one-person enterprise into a multi-employee operation that is supported primarily by advertising revenue.[35][36] During the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, the site received over a million unique visitors per day.[37] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site for publishing misinformation.[38][39][40]

 

[bodecea]

Yet another fool demanding a link.

Learn to search for yourself. Or can't you type "google"?

And there was nothing "inaccurate" about what I said!

Yet another fool who has no link....just wishful "thinking".

 

[Oddball]

Trump is desperately trying to get lawyers to represent him. He has an ad on Craig's list looking for a lawywer. His two top lawyers on this case quit.
You idiots make shit up. What world do you live in? (I did make up the Craig's list comment}
Great resource
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[34]

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Yet another fool who has no link....just wishful "thinking".

Teabaggers make the claim.....but what "others" to look their claims up?
How Trumpian.

 

[Lesh]

Motion DENIED

Next?

 

[Care4all]

They should file a motion to dismiss based on the presidential records act which states the president can take any damn document with him that he chooses! Also backed up by the supreme court when it was bill clinton in the hot seat for the same thing.

No, the Presidential Records Act DOES NOT say that thunk. It says just the OPPOSITE of that, and was created for just the OPPOSITE of what you state. It was created because of Nixon and his fight to keep his presidential records and govt tape recordings, from us.

For the first 5 years, the president's records can not be released on FOIA Request from the public, only the president can authorize NARA to release a record to someone. But after the 5 years, by law, NARA has to release records requested by FOIA requests of the public, with a handful of exceptions.

,..............

Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978​

The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions.

Specifically, the PRA:

• Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records.
• Requires that Vice-Presidential records be treated in the same way as Presidential records.
• Places the responsibility for the custody and management of incumbent Presidential records with the President.
• Requires that the President and his staff take all practical steps to file personal records separately from Presidential records.
• Allows the incumbent President to dispose of records that no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value, once the views of the Archivist of the United States on the proposed disposal have been obtained in writing.
• Establishes in law that any incumbent Presidential records (whether textual or electronic) held on courtesy storage by the Archivist remain in the exclusive legal custody of the President and that any request or order for access to such records must be made to the President, not NARA.
• Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
• Establishes a process by which the President may restrict and the public may obtain access to these records after the President leaves office; specifically, the PRA allows for public access to Presidential records through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) beginning five years after the end of the Administration, but allows the President to invoke as many as six specific restrictions to public access for up to twelve years.
• Codifies the process by which former and incumbent Presidents conduct reviews for executive privilege prior to public release of records by NARA (which had formerly been governed by Executive order 13489).
• Establishes procedures for Congress, courts, and subsequent Administrations to obtain “special access” to records from NARA that remain closed to the public, following a privilege review period by the former and incumbent Presidents; the procedures governing such special access requests continue to be governed by the relevant provisions of E.O. 13489.
• Establishes preservation requirements for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts: any individual creating Presidential records must not use non-official electronic messaging accounts unless that individual copies an official account as the message is created or forwards a complete copy of the record to an official messaging account. (A similar provision in the Federal Records Act applies to federal agencies.)
• Prevents an individual who has been convicted of a crime related to the review, retention, removal, or destruction of records from being given access to any original records.

 

[ElmerMudd]

View attachment 794718

Gateway Pundit is a better source than Wikipedia. Only to the dumbest among us.

 

[Oddball]

Gateway Pundit is a better source than Wikipedia. Only to the dumbest among us.

I don't source GP, butt plug.

 

[Lesh]

I don't source GP, butt plug.

Where do you get them then?

 

[ElmerMudd]

I don't source GP, butt plug.

Your source is your demented brain. I think your brain and Gateway Pundit are very similar. They are not dealing with reality.

 

[Thunk]

No, the Presidential Records Act DOES NOT say that thunk. It says just the OPPOSITE of that,

Look...I'm right and you're wrong. You are just going to have to deal with that.

 

[Thunk]

Requires that the President and his staff take all practical steps to file personal records separately from Presidential records.

And who is the SOLE ARBITER of deciding what is personal and what is presidential?

That's right...THE PRESIDENT. The supreme court ruled it for bill clinton. The president cannot even delegate that authority and nobody can challenge it.

 

[Lesh]

And who is the SOLE ARBITER of deciding what is personal and what is presidential?

That's right...THE PRESIDENT. The supreme court ruled it for bill clinton. The president cannot even delegate that authority and nobody can challenge it.

That is absolutely NOT true.