DHS Vans Taking Antifa Away

[colfax_m]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

 

[colfax_m]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

 

[progressive hunter]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

 

[colfax_m]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

 

[jc456]

What do you mean charges and court date? This just happened less than a week ago. Lawsuits are already being filed.

But yeah, it was an arrest by every legal definition and without probable cause, it's unconstitutional which is why he was released as soon as a lawyer showed up to assess the situation

Lawyer came in asked if he was being charged, they said nope, and let him go. Happens daily everywhere

 

[jc456]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

 

[progressive hunter]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

 

[jc456]

By arresting someone without probable cause

They don’t need probable cause to detain someone! Post a link son

 

[colfax_m]

What do you mean charges and court date? This just happened less than a week ago. Lawsuits are already being filed.

But yeah, it was an arrest by every legal definition and without probable cause, it's unconstitutional which is why he was released as soon as a lawyer showed up to assess the situation

Lawyer came in asked if he was being charged, they said nope, and let him go. Happens daily everywhere

So you're saying the police violate the constitution every day and everywhere? And you wonder why we want police reforms so badly.

 

[colfax_m]

By arresting someone without probable cause

They don’t need probable cause to detain someone! Post a link son

It was detention, it was arrest.

 

[colfax_m]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

 

[colfax_m]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1322&context=vlr

 

[progressive hunter]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

no its not,,,its called taking someone in for questioning,, and as we see he refused to answer questions and was released,,,

sorry thats not being arrested,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1322&context=vlr

your own link just proved you wrong,,,,

 

[colfax_m]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

no its not,,,its called taking someone in for questioning,, and as we see he refused to answer questions and was released,,,

sorry thats not being arrested,,,

Taking someone in for questioning requires probable cause they committed a crime because that's an arrest. He wasn't released because he refused to answer questions, he was released because the lawyer realized they didn't have probable cause.

 

[progressive hunter]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

no its not,,,its called taking someone in for questioning,, and as we see he refused to answer questions and was released,,,

sorry thats not being arrested,,,

Taking someone in for questioning requires probable cause they committed a crime because that's an arrest. He wasn't released because he refused to answer questions, he was released because the lawyer realized they didn't have probable cause.

got a link that gives the lawyers name or that he was there cause I aint heard that one yet,,,

and youre wrong about the rest of that BS,,,

 

[colfax_m]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1322&context=vlr

your own link just proved you wrong,,,,

The link gives a court case asserting that an arrest does not require charges or booking.

So it actually proves you wrong.

 

[progressive hunter]

when youre arrested you are charged with a crime and given a court date to answer for those charges,,,

That's not how the courts define an arrest.

https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1322&context=vlr

your own link just proved you wrong,,,,

The link gives a court case asserting that an arrest does not require charges or booking.

So it actually proves you wrong.

case law doesnt apply to constitution,,,

sorrry but youre wrong,,,

wheres that link to his lawyer???

 

[iceberg]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

no its not,,,its called taking someone in for questioning,, and as we see he refused to answer questions and was released,,,

sorry thats not being arrested,,,

Taking someone in for questioning requires probable cause they committed a crime because that's an arrest. He wasn't released because he refused to answer questions, he was released because the lawyer realized they didn't have probable cause.

and what makes you think that after WEEKS of tearing shit up, lighting fires and attacking police, federal officers and federal buildings they LACK probable cause?

PROVE THEY DON'T HAVE SUCH PROOF.

should be easy. stop talking shit in circles and prove ANYTHING you blither out.

so let me ask you this - do you believe people are destroying federal property and attacking federal agents?

 

[colfax_m]

Because the DHS admitted it in a press conference which is why they're bending over backwards to make it seem like this wasn't an arrest when it very clearly was

Again, why do we care?

Because Americans care about the constitution. It's kind of important to us.

you have yet to show where the constitution was violated,,,

4th amendment kiddo. Asked and answered. Try to remember.

thats what you claim the violated,,,but how did they violate it???

By arresting someone without probable cause.

how do you know they didnt have probable cause???

were you there???

NO you werent,,,

based on all the info I've read they had plenty of probable cause,,,


OH,,, and he wasnt arrested,,,

DHS admitted it in a press conference.

Grabbing someone on a street and hauling them off to the court house is an arrest.

no its not,,,its called taking someone in for questioning,, and as we see he refused to answer questions and was released,,,

sorry thats not being arrested,,,

Taking someone in for questioning requires probable cause they committed a crime because that's an arrest. He wasn't released because he refused to answer questions, he was released because the lawyer realized they didn't have probable cause.

got a link that gives the lawyers name or that he was there cause I aint heard that one yet,,,

and youre wrong about the rest of that BS,,,

It was in the DHS press conference.