Dick's CEO Confronted By Shareholder For Scorched Earth Against 2nd Amd.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Get Woke! Go Broke!


Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. DKS -2.17% said weaker sales of Under Armour Inc. apparel and a decision to pull back from the hunting business dragged on the retailer’s latest quarterly results.

Comparable-store sales fell 4%, Dick’s said. Not adjusting for the 53rd week last year, the company’s same-store sales declined 1.9%.

The weaker-than-expected results bucked a trend in the retail sector, which largely has benefited from a surge in consumer spending fueled by a booming economy.

Consumer confidence for August, measured by the Conference Board’s consumer-confidence index, was the highest it has been in about 18 years.

That sentiment, along with other factors, has powered companies such as Walmart Inc. WMT -0.45% and Target Corp. TGT 1.07% to their best quarterly results in more than a decade.

Dick’s said part of the company’s sales problems were a result of Under Armour’s decision to sell in more stores including Kohl’s. Under Armour declined to comment.

Also hurting sales was Dick’s decision to tighten its policy on gun sales after 17 people were killed in a February shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school. The retailer halted sales of any firearms to people under age 21 at all of its 845 Dick’s and Field & Stream stores and stopped selling assault-style weapons at Field & Stream.

Under Armour’s results accounted for three percentage points of declining sales at Dick’s, while weakness in the hunting and electronics categories contributed two percentage points of decline. When excluding Under Armour and the hunting and electronics business, comparable-store sales fell 1%....

Dick’s Says Under Armour, New Gun-Sales Policy Dragged on Results

Dick's leadership is betraying the stockholders, by putting acting according to their liberal ideology instead of their professional and ethical responsibilities.


If we had a healthy corporate culture in this country, they would all, at least be fired, if not sued.

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Get Woke! Go Broke!


Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc. DKS -2.17% said weaker sales of Under Armour Inc. apparel and a decision to pull back from the hunting business dragged on the retailer’s latest quarterly results.

Comparable-store sales fell 4%, Dick’s said. Not adjusting for the 53rd week last year, the company’s same-store sales declined 1.9%.

The weaker-than-expected results bucked a trend in the retail sector, which largely has benefited from a surge in consumer spending fueled by a booming economy.

Consumer confidence for August, measured by the Conference Board’s consumer-confidence index, was the highest it has been in about 18 years.

That sentiment, along with other factors, has powered companies such as Walmart Inc. WMT -0.45% and Target Corp. TGT 1.07% to their best quarterly results in more than a decade.

Dick’s said part of the company’s sales problems were a result of Under Armour’s decision to sell in more stores including Kohl’s. Under Armour declined to comment.

Also hurting sales was Dick’s decision to tighten its policy on gun sales after 17 people were killed in a February shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school. The retailer halted sales of any firearms to people under age 21 at all of its 845 Dick’s and Field & Stream stores and stopped selling assault-style weapons at Field & Stream.

Under Armour’s results accounted for three percentage points of declining sales at Dick’s, while weakness in the hunting and electronics categories contributed two percentage points of decline. When excluding Under Armour and the hunting and electronics business, comparable-store sales fell 1%....

Dick’s Says Under Armour, New Gun-Sales Policy Dragged on Results

Dick's leadership is betraying the stockholders, by putting acting according to their liberal ideology instead of their professional and ethical responsibilities.


If we had a healthy corporate culture in this country, they would all, at least be fired, if not sued.

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

 

[boedicca]

Dick's leadership is betraying the stockholders, by putting acting according to their liberal ideology instead of their professional and ethical responsibilities.


If we had a healthy corporate culture in this country, they would all, at least be fired, if not sued.

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's are not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

 

[boedicca]

Dick's leadership is betraying the stockholders, by putting acting according to their liberal ideology instead of their professional and ethical responsibilities.


If we had a healthy corporate culture in this country, they would all, at least be fired, if not sued.

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

Yes, more work for lawyers. That's why people invest.

As if.

 

[jon_berzerk]

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

Yes, more work for lawyers. That's why people invest.

As if.

there are risks to investing money

that is just the way it is

 

[jon_berzerk]

DKS - Dick's Sporting Goods Inc Shareholders - CNNMoney.com

 

[hadit]

So what? I'm sure horse and buggy stock isn't doing so well, either. Times are changing, and people are waking up to what guns really are : death tools.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

But all of them exist so that the weak are not the victims of the strong.

For most of human history, the strong and the trained victimized the regular people.

democrats want to return us to that situation, particularly so that women are defenseless.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

they are free to do so

and stock holders are free to leave

and customers are free to shop elsewhere

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

So what? I'm sure horse and buggy stock isn't doing so well, either. Times are changing, and people are waking up to what guns really are : death tools.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

 

[boedicca]

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

Yes, more work for lawyers. That's why people invest.

As if.

there are risks to investing money

that is just the way it is

*sigh*

There are risks to pretty much everything. But that doesn't justify fraud or malfeasance.

 

[boedicca]

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

So what? I'm sure horse and buggy stock isn't doing so well, either. Times are changing, and people are waking up to what guns really are : death tools.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

I'm not interested in your dinner menu.

 

[hadit]

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

But all of them exist so that the weak are not the victims of the strong.

For most of human history, the strong and the trained victimized the regular people.

democrats want to return us to that situation, particularly so that women are defenseless.

It is true that a firearm makes an otherwise weaker woman the equal of an otherwise stronger man. I wonder why anti gunners don't like that very much.

 

[hadit]

No, Dick's leadership is not free to act in interests counter to the interest of the sharedholders. They have fiduciary responsibility towards the shareholders for their stock ownership.

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

So what? I'm sure horse and buggy stock isn't doing so well, either. Times are changing, and people are waking up to what guns really are : death tools.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

You're going to have to do better than that weakness if you want to be taken seriously.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

I'm not interested in your dinner menu.

That's nice, but that post wasn't to you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

That's exactly what they are. Yet you will catch shade for calling them that. Guns have NO other function though. All value is derived from that function. The function of putting lead in flesh at range with intent to kill. They are dangerous weapons and our system of management is grossly unqualified.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

You're going to have to do better than that weakness if you want to be taken seriously.

Why would I care if you took me seriously? You freely and easily lie when you perceive your personal fetishes to be under any criticism, as you just showed. Insults from people like you are a badge of honor for honest, rational people.

 

[boedicca]

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

I'm not interested in your dinner menu.

That's nice, but that post wasn't to you.

I doubt that hadit is interested in it either.

 

[hadit]

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

That's nice. But, in the case of dick's, anyone who bought shares before this announcement, then sold, made a lot of money. So you are kind of missing your own point.

Shareholder's a not a monolith. People buy and sell at different times - what is constant is that management has a fiduciary responsibility to all shareholders, not just ones who sell before an earnings release.

Many, many guns exist solely to put holes in paper targets, not flesh. Many others never get fired at all and are simply works of art.

All true. And many swords exist only to chop watermelons in half for fun, or are simply works of art. But you would still wonder, "whats up wirh this fucking freak????", if the guy in front of you at the grocery store had two swords across his back.

Only if he were to pull one out and use it like a weapon. The point still remains that not all guns exist to put holes in flesh, contrary to your contention.

Haha...bullshit.

You're going to have to do better than that weakness if you want to be taken seriously.

Why would I care if you took me seriously? You freely and easily lie when you perceive your personal fetishes to be under any criticism, as you just showed. Insults from people like you are a badge of honor for honest, rational people.

Feel free to point out the lie. Failing that, and you will, feel free to play in traffic.

 

[jon_berzerk]

like i said if the stockholders are not happy they can invest elsewhere

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

Yes, more work for lawyers. That's why people invest.

As if.

there are risks to investing money

that is just the way it is

*sigh*

There are risks to pretty much everything. But that doesn't justify fraud or malfeasance.

exactly and if there is fraud there are remedies for that

 

[boedicca]

You are missing the point. If someone bought the shares at a higher price, selling at a loss due caused by management's horrible decisions is rather cold comfort.

indeed

i didnt miss anything i understand it can be a shitty deal

however

people at time do make a mistake with the money they invest

they can always sue more so if dicks misrepresented their views

Yes, more work for lawyers. That's why people invest.

As if.

there are risks to investing money

that is just the way it is

*sigh*

There are risks to pretty much everything. But that doesn't justify fraud or malfeasance.

exactly and if there is fraud there are remedies for that

Cold comfort, bub.

 

[skews13]

At the annual shareholders meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, CEO Edward Stack of Dick's Sporting Goods was confronted and grilled by shareholder and Second Amendment advocate David Almasi as to why the sporting good giant betrayed it's customers and more importantly "America's right to keep and bear arms" which is a founding principle of our democracy.

Almasi, a vice president at the National Center for Public Policy Research, attended the meeting representing the think tank's Free Enterprise Project, confronted Stack, accusing him of violating his responsibilities and fiduciary duties, by purposely giving money in support of anti gun propagandists.

Within the crowded assembly Almasi challenged Stack's anti gun stand, blasting the retailer's recent capitulation to the frenzied anti-gun zealots, stating; "Dick's has damaged its reputation by lending its voice and its resources to those who want to abolish the Second Amendment."

Adding, "30% of American adults own guns and another 11% live with someone who does. You've now alienated them."

The sudden assault to our Second Amendment by the retail sporting-goods giant began soon after the February 17th Parkland massacre, in which 17-innocent individuals were senselessly gunned down by a deranged loner.

The company also announced that it would raise the age limit to 21, for purchasing "all firearms," ironically the age limit is 3-years after the legal age for someone serving within the military.

However the most egregious policy change by Dick's is in their mistreatment of their loyal customer's, which are avoid sports enthusiasts, who respect the Second Amendment.

The scorched earth business decision by Dick's to willfully abandon a sizable portion of their loyal customer base, has had a profound negative effect on their bottom-line admitted Stack.

Dicks earnings have been good all year, with record earnings in Q1 this year. Earnings were down in Q3 solely because of disappointing sales of Under Armour. The end of sales for AR 15 rifles has not hurt the companies ratings or earnings at all.

Dicks isn't obligated to sell dumbasses AR 15 rifles, anymore than a religious nutjob is obligated to sell you a cake.

The fact that you believe this makes you way to fucking stupid to be in possession of a gun of any type.

Probably a cake to.