Did NC and TX change their Voting Procedure?

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

AS directed BY the State Legislature. As the Constitution SPECIFICALLY says.

--- which has nothing to do with running elections. Once AGAIN the Constitution requires no elections.

Now then. Whatever the state legislature of, say, Pennsylvania decides, Texas has NO SAY IN IT.

In this case since the LEGISLATURE of the 4 states in question did NOT change their laws Texas does have a say as do the Courts.

The FUCK they do. Texas governs Texas ---- not North Cackalackee. PERIOD.

Sorry RETARD but those 4 states VIOLATED the law. You remember that right? The Constitution is clear as a bell. And if they violated the voting law they violated the rights of ALL the States.

So did Texas. The Texas legislature never voted to extend the voting period.
You can't have it both ways.

Aside from the fact Abbott's proclamation laid out all the necessary statutes to ensure it's legality, his actions could have changed the election results. Whereas the violations in question in the Texas lawsuit could. Totally different aspects of election law that simply do not compare. This is nothing but a red herring.

The fact remains that the legislative process was ignored by Texas when it illegally changed it's voting laws. Thus making the already laughable lawsuit it filed hypocritical as well as crazy.

 

[Claudette]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

 

[Shelzin]

I'm not.
Your blob lost. *shrugs*

You have nothing to worry about then.

 

[candycorn]

I'm not.
Your blob lost. *shrugs*

You have nothing to worry about then.

correct...my candidate is being sworn in on the 20th. Yours? No so much. *shrugs*

 

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

Texas didn't go through the legislature either shit brains.

 

[Rogue AI]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

AS directed BY the State Legislature. As the Constitution SPECIFICALLY says.

--- which has nothing to do with running elections. Once AGAIN the Constitution requires no elections.

Now then. Whatever the state legislature of, say, Pennsylvania decides, Texas has NO SAY IN IT.

In this case since the LEGISLATURE of the 4 states in question did NOT change their laws Texas does have a say as do the Courts.

The FUCK they do. Texas governs Texas ---- not North Cackalackee. PERIOD.

Sorry RETARD but those 4 states VIOLATED the law. You remember that right? The Constitution is clear as a bell. And if they violated the voting law they violated the rights of ALL the States.

So did Texas. The Texas legislature never voted to extend the voting period.
You can't have it both ways.

Aside from the fact Abbott's proclamation laid out all the necessary statutes to ensure it's legality, his actions could have changed the election results. Whereas the violations in question in the Texas lawsuit could. Totally different aspects of election law that simply do not compare. This is nothing but a red herring.

The fact remains that the legislative process was ignored by Texas when it illegally changed it's voting laws. Thus making the already laughable lawsuit it filed hypocritical as well as crazy.

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

 

[candycorn]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

The Legislature did not approve the expansion of early voting. Texas is accusing other states of what itself is guilty of.

 

[Rogue AI]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

The Legislature did not approve the expansion of early voting. Texas is accusing other states of what itself is guilty of.

Not really, it's apples and oranges.

 

[Claudette]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

The Legislature did not approve the expansion of early voting. Texas is accusing other states of what itself is guilty of.

Not really, it's apples and oranges.

LOL Seems Ol'Candy is getting a little worried. What do you think??

 

[konradv]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

The Legislature did not approve the expansion of early voting. Texas is accusing other states of what itself is guilty of.

Not really, it's apples and oranges.

Sorry, but hand waving a problem away isn't going to help Trump. For that you need actual evidence. Tick, tock, the 14th isn't that far off.

 

[TNHarley]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

An act of the legislature you say:


View attachment 427202

The governor of Texas issuing a proclamation isn't a legislative action....

Governor Abbott Extends Early Voting Period For November 3rd Election

gov.texas.gov

So what do you say to all those Texicans who voted early? Sorry...your vote doesn't count?

Here is the part where you tell us that when Abbott issues an order it is perfectly fine but when officials in other states issue an order it is somehow bogus.

Hop to it.

And the Texas GOP tried to sue over this and lost. The TX SC ruled for abbott.
I think because of how long it took them or something. Cant remember.

 

[Claudette]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

Texas didn't go through the legislature either shit brains.

Yes they did. I just read about it. You should too. The Dems in Texas tried to sue the Governor over it through the 5th circuit court of appeals and lost.

Nice story. The Governor and legislature made changes to cope with the Chinese virus.

 

[Rogue AI]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity. Although I think you know this and are just arguing for the sake of it, which is fair enough, that's why we come here.

The Legislature did not approve the expansion of early voting. Texas is accusing other states of what itself is guilty of.

Not really, it's apples and oranges.

LOL Seems Ol'Candy is getting a little worried. What do you think??

I agree, even their media masters aren't making the arguments we see here. Guess Toobin should have kept in his pants. He was their Supreme Court goto guy.

 

[Claudette]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

AS directed BY the State Legislature. As the Constitution SPECIFICALLY says.

Yup and that's what the Governor of Texas did. He and the legislature made voting changes because of the Chinese virus.

 

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

Texas didn't go through the legislature either shit brains.

Yes they did. I just read about it. You should too. The Dems in Texas tried to sue the Governor over it through the 5th circuit court of appeals and lost.

Nice story. The Governor and legislature made changes to cope with the Chinese virus.

Strange...their legislature only meets in even numbered years for 90 days.

They were not even in session in 2020.

Your move dumbfuck.

 

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

AS directed BY the State Legislature. As the Constitution SPECIFICALLY says.

Yup and that's what the Governor of Texas did. He and the legislature made voting changes because of the Chinese virus.

Texas Republicans sue to stop Gov. Greg Abbott's extension of early voting period during the pandemic

State party Chair Allen West, Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller and members of the Texas Legislature were among those who filed the suit against Abbott.

www.texastribune.org

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Sued By His Own Republican Party Over Expanding Early Voting

Abbott has lost the support of many fellow Republicans.

www.forbes.com

CBS Texas - Breaking Local News, First Alert Weather & I-Team Investigations

Latest breaking news from CBS11 KTVT-TV | KTXA-TV.

dfw.cbslocal.com

Texas Republicans Sue To Stop Gov. Greg Abbott’s Extension Of Early Voting Period During The Pandemic | Houston Public Media

State party chairman Allen West, Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller and members of the Texas Legislature were among those who filed the suit against Abbott.

www.houstonpublicmedia.org

You have no earthly idea what you're talking about.

 

[Claudette]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

Texas didn't go through the legislature either shit brains.

Yes they did. I just read about it. You should too. The Dems in Texas tried to sue the Governor over it through the 5th circuit court of appeals and lost.

Nice story. The Governor and legislature made changes to cope with the Chinese virus.

Strange...their legislature only meets in even numbered years for 90 days.

They were not even in session in 2020.

Your move dumbfuck.

Guess you never heard of emergency meetings. Your move dumbfuck.

 

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Yup and that's where the States named in the suite fucked up. They didn't go through their legislatures. Totally unconstitutional. Texas and those backing the suite have a damned good case.

Texas didn't go through the legislature either shit brains.

Yes they did. I just read about it. You should too. The Dems in Texas tried to sue the Governor over it through the 5th circuit court of appeals and lost.

Nice story. The Governor and legislature made changes to cope with the Chinese virus.

Strange...their legislature only meets in even numbered years for 90 days.

They were not even in session in 2020.

Your move dumbfuck.

Guess you never heard of emergency meetings. Your move dumbfuck.

Please cite any source that talks about a special session of the legislature in Texas to consider extending the voting periods.

Support your argument dumbfuck. I'll wait.

 

[colfax_m]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity.

So you think emergency powers can override the constitution?

 

[Rogue AI]

You would need to show that the election officials in the states in question had similar emergency powers to give your comparison any validity.

So you think emergency powers can override the constitution?

Nope, get informed on the topic and get back to us.