Did Trump Incite Insurrection?

The difference?

Mine is based on reality.

The Reichstag Fire is hardly reality, Chang.

Nazi to English Dictionary:

INSURRECTION!!!!!

1622727916296.png


Peaceful Protest:re:

1622727985951.png
 
My, the never ending dumbfuckery of "Conservatives" on display once again.

Fucking Nazi.

View attachment 496858
Tell me more, Fruitcake.


{In August, Spencer said that he was planning on voting Democratic because "the liberals are clearly more competent people.}


You are truly the dumbest cocksucker on USMB.

By a long shot.
 
My, the never ending dumbfuckery of "Conservatives" on display once again.

Fucking Nazi.

View attachment 496858
Tell me more, Fruitcake.


{In August, Spencer said that he was planning on voting Democratic because "the liberals are clearly more competent people.}


You are truly the dumbest cocksucker on USMB.

By a long shot.

I guess to you, that means he and his followers didn't give Trump your nazi salute.

And I guess this means you think you're not an idiot...

 
My, the never ending dumbfuckery of "Conservatives" on display once again.

Fucking Nazi.

View attachment 496858
Tell me more, Fruitcake.


{In August, Spencer said that he was planning on voting Democratic because "the liberals are clearly more competent people.}


You are truly the dumbest cocksucker on USMB.

By a long shot.

I guess to you, that means he and his followers didn't give Trump your nazi salute.

And I guess this means you think you're not an idiot...


The article's defense of Zionism is interesting. The writer seems to believe that an alt-right person can't be supportive of Zionism, yet historically, much of the push for the creation of Israel came from people in Europe that wanted Jews to leave. The fact that many Jews wanted to return to their homeland was convenient to their cause.

So, the same can apply today, if a person wants fewer Jews in their country.

It's like how the "back to Africa" movement that started in the 1800s among black Americans was supported by both blacks themselves and many whites that wanted blacks out of the US.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It's incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement. He told his people election was stolen from them, that he actually won in a landslide, that he needs them to fight like hell...and when fighting broke out and windows started getting broken to the "hang Pance!" chants at the Capitol he just sat back and watched it unfold.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement?

No thats fucking rediculous. Top democrats consistently called violence for the crimnal offense that it is, THATS NOT PROTESTING.

There has been no support of any kind of attack on the government by the Democrats.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?
Harris is just one. She funded the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which "fact checkers" have tried to downplay its role in bailing out rioters.
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement?

No thats fucking rediculous. Top democrats consistently called violence for the crimnal offense that it is, THATS NOT PROTESTING.

There has been no support of any kind of attack on the government by the Democrats.
Then why fund bail for violent protesters?
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement? When considering the fact that multiple Democrats have funded bail for various Antifa/BLM rioters that were apprehended over assault and destruction of property, that's worse than incitement.
Which Democrats funded bail?
Harris is just one. She funded the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which "fact checkers" have tried to downplay its role in bailing out rioters.
Liar, she donated no funds to that.

Who else?
 
So let’s look at what Trump actually said. "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." This is the opposite of inciting violence.

Ooh is that what he said?? Well then nothing to see there...except of course BLATANT INCITEMENT of his zealots to FIGHT for him:


— “We fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.

— “We want to go back, and we want to get this right because we’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.

— “Nobody knows what the hell is going on. There’s never been anything like this. We will not let them silence your voices. We’re not going to let it happen. Not going to let it happen.” The crowd repeatedly chanted “Fight for Trump!” “Thank you,” Trump said.


THE FACTS: Trump’s speech was a call to action — a call to fight and save the country.
Using the word fight is not incitement. Every politician uses such language as struggle or fight against or for something or other.

The DNC uses the word all over their platform.


So by your logic the DNC is guilty of inciting the ongoing deadly riots by BLM and ANTIFA

It';s incitement - you look at what Trump said and did in totality and it's clear as day incitement.

10 House Republicans voted to impeach him for it. McCarthy said president is has responsibility for Jan 6th. McConnel said the same.

And then there is you, living in a fucking denial.
...so do you agree with his assertion that the DNC is also guilty of incitement?

No thats fucking rediculous. Top democrats consistently called violence for the crimnal offense that it is, THATS NOT PROTESTING.

There has been no support of any kind of attack on the government by the Democrats.
Then why fund bail for violent protesters?

Why do cats have two tails?

 

Forum List

Back
Top