Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the justification. for war is outlined in Xiden authorization. law...there are a number of reasons.
and yes WMDs were found as a i stated...and what was reported
sure that was certainly a justification...and xiden had authorized him to use forcethe justification. for war is outlined in Xiden authorization. law...there are a number of reasons.
and yes WMDs were found as a i stated...and what was reported
There are is only 1 reason why Bush determined it was necessary to start a war on March 17 2003. Its here:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.
You said the US military found them. You are a liar.
So where are the rusty old 1980’s WMD artillery shells in the authorization? You lied. Are you saying you agree that the Bush warmongers admitted they did not find the WMD they said was being hidden and were the justification for the war?sure that was certainly a justification..
they didn’t know they existed...saddam was hidding them, how would they have known to spell them out specifically? geezSo where are the rusty old 1980’s WMD artillery shells in the authorization? You lied. Are you saying you agree that the Bush warmongers admitted they did not find the WMD they said was being hidden and were the justification for the war?sure that was certainly a justification..
That’s why Bush was lying. W accused SH of hiding usable combat ready WMD stockpiles that W didn’t know exactly where they were located. He didn’t disclose suspected sites to the 1441 inspectors.they didn’t know they existed...saddam was hidding them,
BUT, these are complex historical issues. Struth is technically right, WMDs, were found. His OPINION on the matter, is valid and is justified. It is not a "lie" or "faith" or any of the dismissive slurs that you have been throwing around like crazy.
when you’re forced to say he was “technically right“ I know that you know he’s a liar. It makes you an accessory after-the-fact. You’re a liar. There’s no other way to describe you.
struth is a liar because he directly said that the old rusty corroded unusable chemical warheads where the WMD that was used to justify the war. He’s a liar because he posted a link that referred to that fact and whereas no one accepts that those were the WMD that were used to justify the war.
trump was critical of the iraq war.TRUMP supported it until the end but they are still there.Biden voted for the war, Chuck and nancy too
Remember it was a Republican who sent the troops.
and bush couldn’t of sent troops without the authorization of xiden and company
also we were already there...Clinton was bombing iraq and signed law passed by xiden and company to overthrow saddam
Yeah sure. Silly me. I thought Bush was protecting the oil reserves but there are fools who believed he was dispensing freedom.
i never said they were the “WMD that was used to justify the war” - you are a liarBUT, these are complex historical issues. Struth is technically right, WMDs, were found. His OPINION on the matter, is valid and is justified. It is not a "lie" or "faith" or any of the dismissive slurs that you have been throwing around like crazy.
when you’re forced to say he was “technically right“ I know that you know he’s a liar. It makes you an accessory after-the-fact. You’re a liar. There’s no other way to describe you.
struth is a liar because he directly said that the old rusty corroded unusable chemical warheads where the WMD that was used to justify the war. He’s a liar because he posted a link that referred to that fact and whereas no one accepts that those were the WMD that were used to justify the war.
geez baghdad bob...are things this hard up after your murderous boss was hung that you have to go around on message boards tossing out your propaganda? You couldn’t of found a job for another horrible leader? oh wait...you did, Xiden!
I have made no assumptions. struth is a liar and the best you could do was say he was “technically” correct.where he makes an assumption,
That is not what I said was being knocked down. You are a liar.lol!! "Knocking down" my beliefs of then, e
Knocking down your lies about what happened back then.”
I notice you did not attempt to refute, challenge, or directly question anything I have said.he does shit like that all the time, where he makes an assumption, and then judges you based on the shit he made up, and then attacks you based on the voices in his head.
What gave you the moral authority to abort half a millions lives to force democracy on the people of Iraq?
Saddam's failure to fulfil his obligations under the ceasefire agreement.
if he wasn’t hiding them...why were they hidden?? hahaI have made no assumptions. struth is a liar and the best you could do was say he was “technically” correct.where he makes an assumption,
struth adds more lies saying SH was hiding the old shells too. He is a liar:
This was public knowledges prior to the stupid invasion that was based on a lie.
U.N. destroying mustard gas shells Wednesday, February 12, 2003 Posted: 10:02 AM EST (1502 GMT)The U.N. inspectors stressed at the time that the ammunition was expected to be there and not a sign of an active chemical weapons program.Previous inspection teams destroyed thousands of chemical weapons shells and agents at al-Muthanna, according to U.N. officials.Al-Muthanna, which was heavily bombed during the 1991 Gulf War, was once Iraq's chief production center for chemical and biological weapons, producing agents such as anthrax, mustard gas and the agent that causes botulism.
I have made no assumptions. struth is a liar and the best you could do was say he was “technically” correct.where he makes an assumption,
struth adds more lies saying SH was hiding the old shells too. He is a liar:
This was public knowledges prior to the stupid invasion that was based on a lie.
U.N. destroying mustard gas shells Wednesday, February 12, 2003 Posted: 10:02 AM EST (1502 GMT)The U.N. inspectors stressed at the time that the ammunition was expected to be there and not a sign of an active chemical weapons program.Previous inspection teams destroyed thousands of chemical weapons shells and agents at al-Muthanna, according to U.N. officials.Al-Muthanna, which was heavily bombed during the 1991 Gulf War, was once Iraq's chief production center for chemical and biological weapons, producing agents such as anthrax, mustard gas and the agent that causes botulism.
www.merriam-webster.com
That is not what I said was being knocked down. You are a liar.lol!! "Knocking down" my beliefs of then, e
Knocking down your lies about what happened back then.”
Your lies are a current problem.
What gave you the moral authority to abort half a millions lives to force democracy on the people of Iraq?
Saddam's failure to fulfil his obligations under the ceasefire agreement.
Was the ceasefire agreement made with you?
sure that was certainly a justification...and xiden had authorized him to use forcethe justification. for war is outlined in Xiden authorization. law...there are a number of reasons.
and yes WMDs were found as a i stated...and what was reported
There are is only 1 reason why Bush determined it was necessary to start a war on March 17 2003. Its here:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.
You said the US military found them. You are a liar.
Geez man, it's like talking to a five year old....we know all the reasons...numerous reasons, that Xiden and company outlined for taking out Saddam...WMDs were one of those reason...and nonexistant? I have highlighted, that somewhere found.sure that was certainly a justification...and xiden had authorized him to use forcethe justification. for war is outlined in Xiden authorization. law...there are a number of reasons.
and yes WMDs were found as a i stated...and what was reported
There are is only 1 reason why Bush determined it was necessary to start a war on March 17 2003. Its here:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.
You said the US military found them. You are a liar.
Invading a country because you are looking for nonexistent WMDs??
Bush finally admitted there were NONE. Why do you think the Brits went to so much trouble to SELL the war in 1998 with Operation Mass Appeal? They spent 3 years demonizing Saddam and Iraq in the press... propagandizing their position with rumors and speculation.
Talk about a witch hunt.. Didn't you catch on with the Booze Wars in KSA when the Brits were carbombing themselves and got caught?
if he wasn’t hiding them...why were they hidden?? hahaI have made no assumptions. struth is a liar and the best you could do was say he was “technically” correct.where he makes an assumption,
struth adds more lies saying SH was hiding the old shells too. He is a liar:
This was public knowledges prior to the stupid invasion that was based on a lie.
U.N. destroying mustard gas shells Wednesday, February 12, 2003 Posted: 10:02 AM EST (1502 GMT)The U.N. inspectors stressed at the time that the ammunition was expected to be there and not a sign of an active chemical weapons program.Previous inspection teams destroyed thousands of chemical weapons shells and agents at al-Muthanna, according to U.N. officials.Al-Muthanna, which was heavily bombed during the 1991 Gulf War, was once Iraq's chief production center for chemical and biological weapons, producing agents such as anthrax, mustard gas and the agent that causes botulism.
Geez man, it's like talking to a five year old....we know all the reasons...numerous reasons, that Xiden and company outlined for taking out Saddam...WMDs were one of those reason...and nonexistant? I have highlighted, that somewhere found.sure that was certainly a justification...and xiden had authorized him to use forcethe justification. for war is outlined in Xiden authorization. law...there are a number of reasons.
and yes WMDs were found as a i stated...and what was reported
There are is only 1 reason why Bush determined it was necessary to start a war on March 17 2003. Its here:
“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” DUBYA the DECIDER March 17 2003.
You said the US military found them. You are a liar.
Invading a country because you are looking for nonexistent WMDs??
Bush finally admitted there were NONE. Why do you think the Brits went to so much trouble to SELL the war in 1998 with Operation Mass Appeal? They spent 3 years demonizing Saddam and Iraq in the press... propagandizing their position with rumors and speculation.
Talk about a witch hunt.. Didn't you catch on with the Booze Wars in KSA when the Brits were carbombing themselves and got caught?
I am sure the Brits were just as concerned in 1998, Xiden and Clinton were as well..hence why they made it US policy in 1998 to overthrow Saddam
