DNC rules to shut out minor candidates from debates

[Wyatt earp]

I am sure you have lots of post whining about the GOP doing the same thing


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

How so the Republicans don't discriminate on who runs like the DNC does, liberal Trump was welcomed, with Socialist Bernie the DNC had to rig it so he didn't have a chance in hell.

Did the Repubs have all 16 people on the stage at the debates at the same time? Or did they limit the main debate to just certain people?

Why you avoiding my fact the Democrats discriminate with US tax dollars and the Republicans don't?


.

what the fuck are you talking about?

you should not be drunk this early on a Sunday morning.

I am talking news and politics you are talking out your ass like normal, once again the Republicans don't discriminate with US tax dollars on who runs as a republican, the democrats do.

 

[kyzr]

The CA convention delegates booed Hickenlooper for saying that socialism isn't the way to go. Its looking better and better for Trump in 2020.

 

[SeaGal]

Did the Repubs have all 16 people on the stage at the debates at the same time? Or did they limit the main debate to just certain people?

17 candidates. They all were invited to debate on the same day split into 2 time slots.

2016 Republican Party presidential debates and forums - Wikipedia

The important thing is - all were heard.

Is that what the Dems are doing? Splitting the debates into smaller groups?...or eliminating some candidates?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am talking news and politics you are talking out your ass like normal, once again the Republicans don't discriminate with US tax dollars on who runs as a republican, the democrats do.

you are talking out of your ass. How does the DNC discriminate with US tax dollars on who runs as a democrat? That makes no sense at all. Tax dollars are not used for campaigns.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Did the Repubs have all 16 people on the stage at the debates at the same time? Or did they limit the main debate to just certain people?

17 candidates. They all were invited to debate on the same day split into 2 time slots.

2016 Republican Party presidential debates and forums - Wikipedia

The important thing is - all were heard.

Is that what the Dems are doing? Splitting the debates into smaller groups?...or eliminating some candidates?

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

 

[SeaGal]

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

Ahhh...but they were heard, weren't they?...and of course with todays technology those debates were accessible to those who wanted to hear them.

So, again I ask...is the DNC offering all the candidates a spot on the debate stage as the RNC did?...or not?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

Ahhh...but they were heard, weren't they?...and of course with todays technology those debates were accessible to those who wanted to hear them.

So, again I ask...is the DNC offering all the candidates a spot on the debate stage as the RNC did?...or not?

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

 

[Thinker101]

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

Ahhh...but they were heard, weren't they?...and of course with todays technology those debates were accessible to those who wanted to hear them.

So, again I ask...is the DNC offering all the candidates a spot on the debate stage as the RNC did?...or not?

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

So your answer is no they didn't?

 

[ColonelAngus]

DNC should just name Biden the nominee and stop wasting everyone’s time and money.

It’s is a verifiably corrupt organization.

 

[Moonglow]

I noticed how the Repubs have no candidates but the president effectively shutting out any minority candidates..It's the All White Power Political Party.(Must be old and crepulant to enjoy)

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

Ahhh...but they were heard, weren't they?...and of course with todays technology those debates were accessible to those who wanted to hear them.

So, again I ask...is the DNC offering all the candidates a spot on the debate stage as the RNC did?...or not?

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

So your answer is no they didn't?

they are giving a platform to more than the GOP did. Not really sure what the problem is.

 

[SeaGal]

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

...but aren't there 23 or 24 candidates?

Actually though, since they all speak with one voice we really only need to hear from one to know all there is to know.

 

[Thinker101]

The "kids" table as the debate with the "minor" candidates was held far earlier when most of the country was still working, as thus they did not get the exposure as the major candidates. Not to mention the stigma of being in the "other" debate.

Ahhh...but they were heard, weren't they?...and of course with todays technology those debates were accessible to those who wanted to hear them.

So, again I ask...is the DNC offering all the candidates a spot on the debate stage as the RNC did?...or not?

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

So your answer is no they didn't?

they are giving a platform to more than the GOP did. Not really sure what the problem is.

A simple NO would have been much easier.

 

[Darkwind]

Pretty easy really. You take the top 8 candidates, put four on one night, four on another, then take the remainder of the alleged "second tier" candidates and split them according to whatever guidance you want.

This way, the Dems who want to watch the spewfest, will tune in on both nights and then every candidate gets exposure.

Fairness, however; was never a progressive trait.

 

[HenryBHough]

Are you not ready for Hillary vs. Nutty Old Uncle Bernie redux?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

They have made accommodations for 20 candidates to be heard on back to back nights...10 each night.

...but aren't there 23 or 24 candidates?

Actually though, since they all speak with one voice we really only need to hear from one to know all there is to know.

that is one more than I need to hear from.

Do you plan to watch the DNC debates?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They'll all say the same shit anyway...just worded different

 

[SeaGal]

I noticed how the Repubs have no candidates but the president effectively shutting out any minority candidates..It's the All White Power Political Party.(Must be old and crepulant to enjoy)

I feel your pain!...76 and 77 respectively.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

View attachment 263556 View attachment 263557

I noticed how the Repubs have no candidates but the president effectively shutting out any minority candidates..It's the All White Power Political Party.(Must be old and crepulant to enjoy)

I feel your pain!...76 and 77 respectively.

don't forget 72....

 

[P F Tinmore]

They'll all say the same shit anyway...just worded different

Not really. The DNC is trying to eliminate anyone who does not pimp the party line.