Do Americans Know Enough About Russia/Ukraine to Support US Involvement ?

Banning books, real history, don't say Gay bills, 440 voter suppression bills, the Farm bill, sports socialism, health care for abortion, etc.

This is what a Nazi party looks like; Here's the Long List of Topics Republicans Want Banned From the Classroom



Let's check for real:


1645833265784.png
 
I provided "proof" from Left-leaning Brookings Inst.

Their words.

Now you've been reduced to a low-life liar.
You didn't produce the memorandum. The CFR propaganda when it comes out of Fox News, or MSNBC, when it comes to foreign affairs? It's all the same. . . hell, I see you jerking lefty chain, that should be clue for you. Nope, provide the original document, or take a walk.

Neo liberal? Neo con?

iu
 
I don't.

Of course it is Russia's fault.

Just like when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, it is the fault of the Japanese.


. . . folks that study these things. . . KNOW WHY these powers were provoked though.

:rolleyes:

If you want to put it in simplistic terms, and say there was no way our imperialistic behavior could have prevented a caged rabid dog from attacking. . you are free to be simple minded.
If the provocation is intentionally intended to upset and rile up the “rabid dog” then I’d say the provocators owned some responsibility. NATO doesn’t exist to piss off Russia it exists for our safety and the safety of our allies. Russia was making a power grab, plain and simple. That shouldn’t be excused and we shouldnt be tucking tail and avoiding the pursuit of our own safety to appease an unhinged dictator.
 
You’re not serious with this post are you?
Just as serious as you are about the foolish statement. . "it exists for our safety and the safety of our allies."

It exists to server the global corporate interests. Anyone that says anything else? Watches too much corporate manufactured consent.
 
Just as serious as you are about the foolish statement. . "it exists for our safety and the safety of our allies."

It exists to server the global corporate interests. Anyone that says anything else? Watches too much corporate manufactured consent.
What are the global corporate interests?
 
What are the global corporate interests?




 





Sorry many I don’t have the patience right now for articles and videos. Just looking for conversation
 
Sorry many I don’t have the patience right now for articles and videos. Just looking for conversation
Well, don't ask such a complex question.

The "interests," to which you are referring?

Just watch cable news, or your nightly news. . . and there you go. The propaganda will push it into your face, and you will come on this forum and parrot those interests.

:rolleyes:

You have literally, zero, self-awareness.

 
In the mid-1960s, then US President Lyndon Johnson sent massive numbers of US troops to Vietnam. At the time, most Americans, without having much information, blindly supported this action. A few years later, after Americans became more informed (and thousands of dead troops were returning in wooden crates), millions of Americans became fiercely opposed to that military endeavor, and Johnson himself refused to run for re-election in 1968.
Fuck. But he is a Democrat. So the United States fought there on the side of the Chinese Communists?

I always thought that the Vietnam War was a Republican war against bloody Mao.

It turns out that this is not so.
 
Well, don't ask such a complex question.

The "interests," to which you are referring?

Just watch cable news, or your nightly news. . . and there you go. The propaganda will push it into your face, and you will come on this forum and parrot those interests.

:rolleyes:

You have literally, zero, self-awareness.

I disagree… I have a ton of self awareness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top