Do you support release of "original" transcript of Trump/Ukraine call?

[WEATHER53]

They want to see a blue pen version in Trumps handwriting. Nothing else will suffice and even that would not Because liberals do not want a resolution but rather a perpetual fly swarm of innuendo buzzing around

 

[skews13]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript.[/QOTE]
It is a waste of your time to suggest that there is something in a different copy of the transcript. Whatever copy it is read from, it will still be a nothing burger. Give up on this, it's a waste of your time.

Actually, you're right. We now have multiple credible witnesses confirming the prid quo pro conversation, backed up by the senior advisor to the President verifying all of it on national television.

We have a smoking gun, laying beside a dead body, with the murderer still at the scene. Doesn't get more cut and dry as this one.

 

[Borillar]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

nobody gives a F about that dumbshit

Of course you rubes don't care if Trump releases some whitewashed "summary". He could perform a partial birth abortion on live tv and then skull fuck the fetus and you brainwashed sycophants would cheer him on.

 

[Lesh]

We WANT to see the original transcript..but guess what?

The sanitized version is damning by itself...

 

[EvMetro]

[

Actually, you're right. We now have multiple credible witnesses confirming the prid quo pro conversation, backed up by the senior advisor to the President verifying all of it on national television.

We have a smoking gun, laying beside a dead body, with the murderer still at the scene. Doesn't get more cut and dry as this one.

If this was true, and you were referring to the call that has been made public, you would be able to clearly define what exactly it is. Lakota knows that there was no smoking gun in it, which is why he wants to see a different copy of it.

 

[Lesh]

If this was true, and you were referring to the call that has been made public, you would be able to clearly define what exactly it is. Lakota knows that there was no smoking gun in it, which is why he wants to see a different copy of it.

You mean other than "the favor"...ya know...investigating Trump's political opponent and helping spread the bogus Crowdstrike nonsense to exonerate Putin...

 

[EvMetro]

If this was true, and you were referring to the call that has been made public, you would be able to clearly define what exactly it is. Lakota knows that there was no smoking gun in it, which is why he wants to see a different copy of it.

You mean other than "the favor"...ya know...investigating Trump's political opponent and helping spread the bogus Crowdstrike nonsense to exonerate Putin...

Quote the smoking gun.

 

[Lakhota]

If this was true, and you were referring to the call that has been made public, you would be able to clearly define what exactly it is. Lakota knows that there was no smoking gun in it, which is why he wants to see a different copy of it.

You mean other than "the favor"...ya know...investigating Trump's political opponent and helping spread the bogus Crowdstrike nonsense to exonerate Putin...

Quote the smoking gun.

In Ukraine, the quid pro quo may have started long before the phone call

 

[WEATHER53]

I can’t answer because the event has already occurred

 

[bripat9643]

I want to see and hear the "actual" recording/transcript of the phone call - not a sanitized version! Don't you?

There is no recording, moron, and you've seen the only transcript that exists.

 

[Lakhota]

I want to see and hear the "actual" recording/transcript of the phone call - not a sanitized version! Don't you?

There is no recording, moron, and you've seen the only transcript that exists.

Funny. Should we take Trump's word for it?

 

[harmonica]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

nobody gives a F about that dumbshit

Of course you rubes don't care if Trump releases some whitewashed "summary". He could perform a partial birth abortion on live tv and then skull fuck the fetus and you brainwashed sycophants would cheer him on.

yes I would--I LOVE it!!!
hahahahahah

 

[Lesh]

I want to see and hear the "actual" recording/transcript of the phone call - not a sanitized version! Don't you?

There is no recording, moron, and you've seen the only transcript that exists.

Talking out you ass as always?

Has anyone been allowed to look at that server where this was stored?

 

[EvMetro]

In Ukraine, the quid pro quo may have started long before the phone call

Or it may have never occurred at all. You were unable to quote the quid pro quo from the phone call transcript that has been made public, which is why you are so interested in trying to find it in some other copy. If you had been able to quote it from the transcript that has been made public, you would have ZERO interest in any other copies of transcript. This is how witch hunts work, and this is why Shifty Shit is doing it behind closed doors.

 

[bripat9643]

Hearing the call is sufficient.

"Sufficient" for what?

 

[bripat9643]

I want to see and hear the "actual" recording/transcript of the phone call - not a sanitized version! Don't you?

There is no recording, moron, and you've seen the only transcript that exists.

Talking out you ass as always?

Has anyone been allowed to look at that server where this was stored?

I think plenty of people in the NSA have looked at it. Are you calling our brave law enforcement people liars?

It appears you are the one who is talking out his ass.

 

[bripat9643]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not the partial summary transcript. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

It ha already been released, you fucking moron.

You clearly missed the part at the bottom of the first page where it says that it's a summary, and is not a word for word documentation of what was said in the call. A summary has been released, but the transcript is still on the server.

BTW................it helps to know what words mean. Let me help you out..............

summary
[ suhm-uh-ree ]
||
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR summary ON THESAURUS.COM
noun, plural sum·ma·ries.
1. a comprehensive and usually brief abstract, recapitulation, or compendium of previously stated facts or statements.
adjective
2. brief and comprehensive; concise.
3. direct and prompt; unceremoniously fast: to treat someone with summary dispatch.
4. (of legal proceedings, jurisdiction, etc.) conducted without, or exempt from, the various steps and delays of a formal trial.

transcript
[ tran-skript ]
|
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR transcript ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. a written, typewritten, or printed copy; something transcribed or made by transcribing.
2. an exact copy or reproduction, especially one having an official status.
3. an official report supplied by a school on the record of an individual student, listing subjects studied, grades received, etc.
4. a form of something as rendered from one alphabet or language into another.

It's not a "summary." it's a transcription, recorded as events happen. The boilerplate at the bottom is meaningless. All that does is give them a pass in case their record isn't 100% accurate. However, it's the only record available. There is no unedited version available.

Sorry, but you are an idiot. It's not "boilerplate" as you call it, it's telling you that it's not a word for word account of what happened, and it even says that there may be some parts left out. Not my fault you don't know or understand what words mean.

By the way, I'll help you out yet again, but this is getting tedious. You really should read a dictionary sometime.

boilerplate
or boil·er plate
[ boi-ler-pleyt ]
|
SEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR boilerplate ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
1. plating of iron or steel for making the shells of boilers, covering the hulls of ships, etc.
2. Journalism.

1. syndicated or ready-to-print copy, used especially by weekly newspapers.
2. trite, hackneyed writing.

3. the detailed standard wording of a contract, warranty, etc.
4. Informal. phrases or units of text used repeatedly, as in correspondence produced by a word-processing system.
5. frozen, crusty, hard-packed snow, often with icy patches.

Every product you buy has a disclaimer put on it. That's all that is: a disclaimer.

 

[bripat9643]

I want to see and hear the "actual" recording/transcript of the phone call - not a sanitized version! Don't you?

There is no recording, moron, and you've seen the only transcript that exists.

Funny. Should we take Trump's word for it?

You should take the word of all the fine people who made the transcription and kept it secure on an NSC server. Do you actually believe all the people involved are helping Trump foist a forged document on the public?

 

[candycorn]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

always better to have more information….be it taxes, transcripts, medical prices, etc...

 

[edward37]

Why is the "original" transcript locked in a classified server? Releasing it could clear up the confusion. If Trump is going to read it publicly in a fireside chat - he should be reading from the ORIGINAL transcript - not from a partial summary. If Americans could see and hear the ORIGINAL transcript - they could make up their own minds as to whether they think it was a clear-cut quid pro quo.

White House lawyer John Eisenberg locked the ORIGINAL transcript in a classified server after Lt. Col. Vindman said it wasn't accurate? Eisenberg told Vindman not to discuss the phone call with ANYONE. Why?

Republican don't want the truth Trump is a degenerate liar Now heroes are traitors?? Trump hides the transcript like he hides his taxes and republicans bend down and kiss his butt