Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What makes you dumb enough to think the military wouldn't uphold their oath to the Constitution over you milk chocolate dear leader, hell most of them can't stand the sob.
I've been in the military and they aren't going to agree with you.
Right, I'm retired military and I think they would, what part of the country do you think the majority of our military come from. It ain't NYC.
I don't give a shit about the person and only the post. When right-wingers are going to neg me for not having the same opinion as they do and troll threads instead of discuss the issues, then they get negged back. I oppose the ideology and it isn't hard to find 20 bad posts. There could be some kind of clock allowing the next round of negs to begin at a certain time of day. Maybe the settings involve having at least 20 others before you can neg the person again, so if a person is negged at a certain time, it's possible negs could be available within 24 hours to do it again. Regardless, it's something the admins should deal with by setting up the system right to prevent it from happening. I'm sure they can change the time parameters for the rep. It's stupid to expect people to watch over 20 people per day that they negged and make sure they don't neg them again in 48 hours.
Are you saying you want to be nannied so you can opt out of taking personal responsibility for your decisions?
Did you fail Kindergarten where you were taught how to tell time?
by closing that mythical "gun show loop hole", I'm sure.it's something the Government should deal with by setting up the system right to prevent it from happening...
He is under indictment, if he is acquitted his firearm will be returned to him.
Did you correct the idiot claiming only felons and the mentally ill can be disarmed?
Only they can have their rights revoked. Thats different form them being suspended by a court while charges are pending.
I've already told you how and you know damned well it would work. I'd even make them renew registrations on shotguns.
So it would require every gun to be registered then, right?
You failed to bring that up in your previous posts.
Gun registration is a no go. You dont need to be registered to practice free speech, or your freedom of travel, or your right to a trial by jury.
Go an hero yourself.
See this is why I think we should go the route of a Gun Owners license. If they are going to have a list. I want it to be just a general list of people licensed to own a gun, not a list of what fucking guns I OWN lol.
A spin off of the other thread where I have asked numerous times and not a single right winger has answered, is if you support the gun show loophole.
For those that may not know, under current federal law if you wish to purchases a firearm, you have to be run in a background check to make sure you are not a felon, been convicted of a violent crime, been in a mental institution, etc,..before they give the go ahead to sell that person a weapon. However under the "gun show loophole", there are not background checks at all.
That's right, absoutly nothing. A violent thug fresh out of the penitentiary, a terrorist, or a nutcases ready to commit the next sandy hook could go down to their local gun show, or find a classified ad selling a firearm and they could purchase deadly weapons, with no questions asked.
Selling a firearm to a felon is already illegal, even if you are NOT a federal firearms dealer.
and what is the difference between a craiglist ad and some guy arranging a street buy for you?
More restrictions on legal gunowners, and no effect on the illegal gun trade.
A felon can be someone who committed a non-violent crime. Once they pay their debt to society, do they still have a right to defend themselves? I say yes.
And who will decide which people are not mentally capable of being responsible with a weapon? Clearly, there are sociopaths and psychopaths who are dangerous no matter what. Other people might have other mental illnesses, like a fear of heights or flying. Should they be denied the right to protect themselves?
Thing is, the criminals will always find a way to obtain weapons, like they always have. Crazy people hellbent on harming others will always find a way to do that.
When people are clearly dangerous, such as diagnosed psychopaths or those convicted of violent crimes, then don't allow them to legally purchase a weapon. Not that it will stop them from illegally purchasing a weapon.
The worst thing we could do is stop law abiding people from purchasing them. It's a right we have and it's a dangerous world.
Wrong. Owning a car is a privilege, owning a firearm is a right.A spin off of the other thread where I have asked numerous times and not a single right winger has answered, is if you support the gun show loophole.
For those that may not know, under current federal law if you wish to purchases a firearm, you have to be run in a background check to make sure you are not a felon, been convicted of a violent crime, been in a mental institution, etc,..before they give the go ahead to sell that person a weapon. However under the "gun show loophole", there are not background checks at all.
That's right, absoutly nothing. A violent thug fresh out of the penitentiary, a terrorist, or a nutcases ready to commit the next sandy hook could go down to their local gun show, or find a classified ad selling a firearm and they could purchase deadly weapons, with no questions asked.
Selling a firearm to a felon is already illegal, even if you are NOT a federal firearms dealer.
and what is the difference between a craiglist ad and some guy arranging a street buy for you?
More restrictions on legal gunowners, and no effect on the illegal gun trade.
You can't sell a house or a car to just anyone without filling out the proper paperwork and registering it with government agencies. You even need to carry insurance with both. The same rules should apply to gun-ownership. You should have to pass a written test and demonstrate you are able to handle a gun in order to obtain a gun license.
There is no gun show loophole.
If one purchases a firearm from a licensed dealer at gun show, a background check is completed, just as if the firearm was purchased at the dealers shop.
Federal law allows residents of the same state to conduct an intrastate transaction absent a background check, as such a check is utterly unfeasible in the context of a private sale.
And should such a private sale be conducted at a gun show, no background check is conducted in accordance with the law; that the sale occurs at a gun show venue is coincidental and irrelevant, hence no loophole.
That doesn't mean proper precautions shouldn't be taken.Wrong. Owning a car is a privilege, owning a firearm is a right.Selling a firearm to a felon is already illegal, even if you are NOT a federal firearms dealer.
and what is the difference between a craiglist ad and some guy arranging a street buy for you?
More restrictions on legal gunowners, and no effect on the illegal gun trade.
You can't sell a house or a car to just anyone without filling out the proper paperwork and registering it with government agencies. You even need to carry insurance with both. The same rules should apply to gun-ownership. You should have to pass a written test and demonstrate you are able to handle a gun in order to obtain a gun license.
It is a textbook example of the corrosive influence of special interests whose agenda is not the well being and safety of We, the People.
That doesn't mean proper precautions shouldn't be taken.Wrong. Owning a car is a privilege, owning a firearm is a right.You can't sell a house or a car to just anyone without filling out the proper paperwork and registering it with government agencies. You even need to carry insurance with both. The same rules should apply to gun-ownership. You should have to pass a written test and demonstrate you are able to handle a gun in order to obtain a gun license.
Exactly...Your idiotic, ineffective and fascistic way or "why have any laws at all?...ANARCHY!"Easy...I said that background checks are idiotic and ineffective (which they are) and you launched off into the all-too-typical progressive/socialist/commie douchebag "why have any laws at all?....ANARCHY!" rant...That's a textbook false dichotomy.OK, then it should be easy for you to explain how it is a false dichotomy?
So, you don't believe anyone should have to have a background check to buy guns?
And your idiotic and completely ineffective background checks are still idiotic and completely ineffective, so, yes, they should be ended altogether.
Then let's check a textbook...
false dichotomy
Noun
false dichotomy (plural false dichotomies)
(logical fallacy) A situation in which two alternative points of views are presented as the only options, whereas others are available.
Now, ask the butler where you went wrong Jethro.
I want to ask a question here of the people pushing the "Gun Show Loophole" stuff.
Just how many people do you think shows up at the average Gun Show as a Private seller instead of a Licensed Vender?
What do you think the Ratio is? 1:1? 1:20? 20:1?
At today's gunshow, as I said earlier, there was 4 rooms of venders. Each room had at least 10 Licensed Venders.
The area for the "Private Sales" was a single row of benches, no tables, about 10 feet long.
That's it.
What prevents a private vender buying a gun at a gun show and reselling it without a background check and don't tell me the law stops it?
Background checks aren't hurting your privacy and if you really value your privacy that much, don't buy a gun! It's as simple as that.
Restrictions on abortions don't violate anyone's rights either. If you don't want the restrictions, don't get an abortion.
Sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it?
Don't you people have a forum on abortion or threads somewhere? Why don't you go there and speak your mind?
We want laws for society and not for you. If don't like it, move!
How about if you are so scared of lawful gun owners, YOU move to some place that regulates them like you want them?
Hell I'm sure we can get a drive going to buy you a one way plane ticket.
I'm not scared of you fucking fools and those laws will be coming to America, because they make sense and we don't want all those unnecessary homicides by gun.
Not only that, but you'll straighten them out on the facts one day and the same goobers will be back two days later, spouting the same lies.Gotta love how this myth is still being portrayed by the leftist trolls
How about if you are so scared of lawful gun owners, YOU move to some place that regulates them like you want them?
Hell I'm sure we can get a drive going to buy you a one way plane ticket.
I'm not scared of you fucking fools and those laws will be coming to America, because they make sense and we don't want all those unnecessary homicides by gun.
But what will you do when the "unnecessary homicides" are by Knife, Club, Rope, or Fist?
