Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Two words
think progress
It's got too be right everybody go home the discussion is over.
Unlike many of your wingnut sources, Think Progress uses live supporting source links in their articles - including the one above.
Unlike many of your wingnut sources, Think Progress uses live supporting source links in their articles - including the one above.
Exactly!
I stand corrected. Will Huggy admit his error?
You're not exactly innocent when giving out a 'free pass' to the right on such issues....
Forget Watergate, what about Iran Contra. You think those none of those weapons given over were fired in anger at anybody?
I think Iran Contra WAS a plan to get around mindless interference from a partisan Congress interjecting itself improperly into foreign affairs.
I am quite sure the plan there was to get guns into the hands of those who sided against our enemies.
I kind of assume some of them WERE fired in anger. But, unlike the idiocy occasioned by the Obama Administration and his corrupt DoJ, the shots were not directed AT Americans.
Stop being such a mindless drone apologist for what even you must know is WRONG behavior -- all the way around -- by DoJ, the Obama Adminsitration and AG Holder.
I think you, and a lot of others, are missing a key point: "wrong behavior" in the sense that the operation was botched, does not equal criminal behavior.
Exactly. 3 Shit sandwiches to go. Have a nice day. How many shit sandwiches do these clowns need to digest before reality sets in???
You're not exactly innocent when giving out a 'free pass' to the right on such issues....
Forget Watergate, what about Iran Contra. You think those none of those weapons given over were fired in anger at anybody?
I think Iran Contra WAS a plan to get around mindless interference from a partisan Congress interjecting itself improperly into foreign affairs.
I am quite sure the plan there was to get guns into the hands of those who sided against our enemies.
I kind of assume some of them WERE fired in anger. But, unlike the idiocy occasioned by the Obama Administration and his corrupt DoJ, the shots were not directed AT Americans.
Stop being such a mindless drone apologist for what even you must know is WRONG behavior -- all the way around -- by DoJ, the Obama Adminsitration and AG Holder.
Iran Contra worked out SO WELL for us, don't you think?
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
More: House panel votes to cite Eric Holder for contempt of Congress - USA Today
I think Iran Contra WAS a plan to get around mindless interference from a partisan Congress interjecting itself improperly into foreign affairs.
I am quite sure the plan there was to get guns into the hands of those who sided against our enemies.
I kind of assume some of them WERE fired in anger. But, unlike the idiocy occasioned by the Obama Administration and his corrupt DoJ, the shots were not directed AT Americans.
Stop being such a mindless drone apologist for what even you must know is WRONG behavior -- all the way around -- by DoJ, the Obama Adminsitration and AG Holder.
Iran Contra worked out SO WELL for us, don't you think?
You go ahead and pretend to be an expert on Iran Contra. Pontificate for us.
But do it in the right thread.
HERE is the wrong thread.
As you know. Deflection and off topic commentary is not productive.
Now, then, back on topic. Watergate: no deaths. F&F, deaths.
Coverup: wrong in both.
Executive CLAIM of "Executive Privilege" = bullshit in EACH case.
F&F is worse than Watergate.
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
More: House panel votes to cite Eric Holder for contempt of Congress - USA Today
Justice Dept. silent as Holder charges critics with racism | The Daily CallerAttorney General Eric Holder accused his growing chorus of critics of racist motivations in a Sunday interview published in the New York Times. When reached by The Daily Caller Monday morning, the Department of Justice provided no evidence to support the attorney generals claims.
Holder said some unspecified faction what he refers to as the more extreme segment is driven to criticize both him and President Barack Obama due to the color of their skin. Holder did not appear to elaborate on who he considered to make up the more extreme segment.
This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him, Holder said, according to the Times. Both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that were both African-American.
The White House hasnt returned requests for comment on whether President Barack Obama agrees with his top law enforcement officers allegations of racial motivations.
Holders accusations come as resignation calls mount from a growing list of 60 congressmen, two senators, every major Republican presidential candidate and two sitting governors, spurred on by the congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious.
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
More: House panel votes to cite Eric Holder for contempt of Congress - USA Today
Iran Contra worked out SO WELL for us, don't you think?
You go ahead and pretend to be an expert on Iran Contra. Pontificate for us.
But do it in the right thread.
HERE is the wrong thread.
As you know. Deflection and off topic commentary is not productive.
Now, then, back on topic. Watergate: no deaths. F&F, deaths.
Coverup: wrong in both.
Executive CLAIM of "Executive Privilege" = bullshit in EACH case.
F&F is worse than Watergate.
Changeout the word "Watergate" with "Iran Contra" and see what you come up with...
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
More: House panel votes to cite Eric Holder for contempt of Congress - USA Today
Wrong.
It was a HOUSE Committee's subpoena. ONLY the House Committee and then the full HOUSE votes on it.
The Senate does not even consider it.
Wrong.
It was a HOUSE Committee's subpoena. ONLY the House Committee and then the full HOUSE votes on it.
The Senate does not even consider it.
Wasn't it the senate that went after Roger Clemons for doing the same thing?
Indeed nothing was worse than that crime ringlord Bush and his evil henchman Darth Cheney's LIES about WMD's in Iraq.
They BOTH should be drawn and quartered for this, but Obama nor Holder hadn't the balls to see Justice done.
Pity.
The contempt resolution will have little practical effect on Holder or the Obama administration. The Democratic-controlled Senate will not take action on a contempt resolution. The issue has been percolating in Congress since Republicans took control of Congress in 2011, but the timing of the vote in an election year has further injected politics into the debate.
More: House panel votes to cite Eric Holder for contempt of Congress - USA Today
I find it funny that the senate went after roger Clemons for doing the same thing.
The bipartisan House committee in front of which Clemens appeared, citing seven apparent inconsistencies in Clemens' testimony, recommended that the Justice Department investigate whether Clemens lied under oath about using performance-enhancing drugs.
