- Aug 4, 2018
- 63,306
- 27,949
OKOkayMy convalescent plasma isYou’re not treating anyone with COVID, so it’s not terribly relevant.I find it compelling.I’m not ignoring Dr Risch, I’ve responded why I don’t find his case compelling. You never read the article so I’m not sure what you’re looking for here.why are you singling her out and ignoring the rest of them including Dr risch???What lies? That lady Stella Immanuel is a little crazy.when did I say I didnt read it???Why do you want me to comment on an article you didn’t even bother to read?it isnt about me,,so stop deflecting,,,You didn’t read the article, did you.you tell me,,,Did he mention any of the negative trials in the article?prove it,,,Cherry picking positive studies which have some questionable characteristics and are out of line with the best available data.what was cherry picked???only because what I provided you proves you wrong,,,I don’t have you on ignore, I just don’t have much to say to you.he responded a few comments ago, so he doesnt have me on ignore,,at least 20 minutes ago,,,he has you and me on ignore. we beat his fugley ass. therefore, he didn't read your article, nor will he respond.you mean like the link I gave you from Dr Risch proving you wrong on all accounts of the topic at hand???Except my link shows that it works in practice. Links don’t work if you don’t read them.What’s your experience that says masks are just for optics?So now you don't believe me? Excellent. I had firsthand experience. You're discussing theory.God I wish people would just stop pretending they know what they’re talking about.Masks are just there for optics. Disease is real. I had it.BTW, I don't believe any numbers coming out today. all bullshit. nothing of value or logic. if masks worked then the masks failed if the count went up. there isn't any other way to look at it. the compliance is by 90% of people. fk, the stay at home participation was worse. But yet, the numbers are rising with masks. How can that even be logically? start naming places people frequent where there have been reported outbreaks. none. zip, and the governors are still talking about stricter restrictions. fk them and their administrations. Fake numbers all of them. I say prove it. BTW, if masks work why is it my glasses fog up when I wear one? why do they stick a nine inch swab into one's head rather than a swab from the mouth? anyone else curious? just asking.It didn't but we have the disease under control. If people were healthier we would have COVID under control too. We are too fat.
If I were fat and or had diabetes, I'd be dead.
Go ahead.
My doctor. Unless you have surgical masks...they are just for show.
Sounds like he may not have been basing that statement on best evidence.
For example:
![]()
Cloth Masks Are Useless Against COVID-19
Lisa Brosseau, ScD: "What we’re seeing is a lot of magical thinking. A lot of wishful thinking. Cloth masks are wishful thinking."www.infectioncontroltoday.com
We can play link games all day.
that and that youre a liar most of the time,,,The proof is in the well controlled clinical trials that demonstrated no effect, not cherry picked observational trials.only because what I provided you proves you wrong,,,
that and that youre a liar most of the time,,,
and those observations were hundreds if not thousands of cases being treated successfully,,,
thats called field trials and was the way things happened for thousands of yrs in medicine,,,
and what was cherry picked???
its an overall observation not cherry picked,, in some cases there was 100% success,,,
as I said it was an overall observation,,,
I wanted your comment because of all the lies you were telling about the doctors in the OP because it proved you wrong and a liar,,,
It sure looks like you didn’t read the article because you don’t seem to have any knowledge of the information in it.
youre doing that because it proves you wrong and a liar,,,