Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
c19adoption.com
Thanks! Think I'll grab some.Not at all 0PJQ! I think I’ve read the same reports you have about that but my husband was able to find two different companies offering it through Amazon.
Crybabying is no substitute for scientific evidence, sorry.C'mon folks. . . Do you want the stonks to tank? Do you want the market to take a dive and the government to collapse? Are you anti-capitalists?!
The only protease inhibitors that work are those that have patents for them by the multi-billion dollar BIG PHARMA, multi-national corporations which are in vertical monopolies with the MSM. Any other protease inhibitors that are not under patent? DO NOT WORK!
Anyone that says otherwise? IS A TERRORIST!
C'mon folks. . . Do you want the stonks to tank? Do you want the market to take a dive and the government to collapse? Are you anti-capitalists?!
The only protease inhibitors that work are those that have patents for them by the multi-billion dollar BIG PHARMA, multi-national corporations which are in vertical monopolies with the MSM. Any other protease inhibitors that are not under patent? DO NOT WORK!
Anyone that says otherwise? IS A TERRORIST!
Of course it doesn’t.
But you knew that.
Question Does adding ivermectin, an inexpensive and widely available antiparasitic drug, to the standard of care reduce the risk of severe disease in patients with COVID-19 and comorbidities?
Findings In this open-label randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with COVID-19 in Malaysia, a 5-day course of oral ivermectin administered during the first week of illness did not reduce the risk of developing severe disease compared with standard of care alone.
Meaning The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.
Efficacy of Ivermectin on Disease Progression in Patients With COVID-19
This randomized clinical trial assesses the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in preventing progression to severe disease among high-risk patients with COVID-19 in Malaysia.jamanetwork.com
That isn't scientific. That is specious stupidity.I would be willing to accept results of scientific studies (really) if you will also accept the result of the scientific study going on all around you:
The vaccines have failed.
Yes?
View attachment 603597
Oh, is it time to play who has the true information and who are promoters of CDC’s advice? Watch what can you open as there are too many well-read individuals currently on here, and you my friend are not one of them. Let me find sources outweighing your study. How about a link to that quote you posted while I check Science.org and Nature studies-including recent studies."
Conclusions
Administration of NAC in high doses did not affect the evolution of severe COVID-19."
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial With N-acetylcysteine for Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
I iggied that clown a long time agoOh, is it time to play who has the true information and who are promoters of CDC’s advice? Watch what can you open as there are too many well-read individuals currently on here, and you my friend are not one of them. Let me find sources outweighing your study. How about a link to that quote you posted while I check Science.org and Nature studies-including recent studies.
For those readers who are not familiar with this poster I’m addressing, I am providing the information for your benefit, not his. He will predictably reject any valid findings that oppose his fixated position. I wouldn’t even be answering him if we didn’t have other posters and many readers
No, as always, time to look at the body of science. But you did just give a lot of insight and how your intellect operates, And it's not a good look., is it time to play who has the true information and who are promoters of CDC’s advice?
Who says your science isn't specious? No one has to believe what they say when others disagree. What part of that don't you get?That isn't scientific. That is specious stupidity.
What are you talking about? Didn't that post just say, that the only protease inhibitors that work are both the Merk and Pfizer ones? The ones that would work for the poor obviously do not.Crybabying is no substitute for scientific evidence, sorry.
www.factcheck.org
Yes I have been tempted to do that as well having had, I guess they were interactions, more like a one-sided conversation because he shuts his ears -like talking to a wall. He’s one of the worst posters on here, and I say that being as judgmental as possible! LolI iggied that clown a long time ago
His only point in being here is to push pHARMa propaganda.I would be willing to accept results of scientific studies (really) if you will also accept the result of the scientific study going on all around you:
The vaccines have failed.
Yes?
View attachment 603597
That isn't scientific. That is specious stupidity.
Incoherent rambling...can't find your point...What are you talking about? Didn't that post just say, that the only protease inhibitors that work are both the Merk and Pfizer ones? The ones that would work for the poor obviously do not.
WE ARE SHEEP. . . JUST LIKE YOU!
Merck, Pfizer COVID-19 Antivirals Different From Ivermectin - FactCheck.org
Merck and Pfizer are each developing a new oral antiviral drug that might prevent or treat COVID-19. The pills are very different from the antiparasitic medication ivermectin, contrary to claims online that they are “suspiciously similar” or that the companies are “repackaging” ivermectin in a...
Pfizer’s new COVID-19 protease inhibitor drug is not just “repackaged ivermectin”
Pfizer recently announced that its new protease inhibitor-based drug was 89% effective in preventing hospitalization due to COVID-19 and it is seeking an emergency use authorization for it from the FDsciencebasedmedicine.org
Hey man, whatever the billionaire oligarchs say, right? You love the ruling elites and lick their boots man.
But.....but.....but...........................That's not what the TV told him!Who says your science isn't specious? No one has to believe what they say when others disagree. What part of that don't you get?
Your idiotic, unedienced claims do not require any more response. That's your handicap. You should not expect anything but to get laughed at and dismissed, because your claims are vapid and stupid and unevidenced.Fact
Free
Insults
One thing he does not do is ramble incoherently. Guess who that leaves rambling incoherently? You.Incoherent rambling...can't find your point...
