Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
You're the one comparing apples and oranges. Hitting is hitting is hitting. What you're trying to do is to justify hitting children.Maybe it's you who should look up the term "self-defense", because comparing that to hitting your kids is ludicrous. Please try again.
Chausette, with respect I am asking you to please consider my post objectively.
It's not that I'm comparing spanking with self-defense, or beating your child to murder. No, that is not it. The point I am trying to convey is that you are broadly generalizing two strikingly different things. You consider spanking and beating to both be bad because, with a very huge and non-discerning brush, you consider them both as "hitting kids." It's the same as saying both self-defense and murder are wrong because it's "killing people." Or that John and Hitler are both bad people because "they eat their veggies."
The error in your logic is a faulty comparison. You have not considered all of the variables.
If there are no degrees, then hitting during play is also hitting and wrong. Is that your contention?
I've played plenty of times with the little one and lightly hit her as part of our game; usually it will start because she decides to hit or kick me because it strikes her as funny, and eventually it leads to back and forth playful hitting. Nothing that hurts, but hey, if hitting is hitting, right?
The little one also likes playful spanking. Again, nothing that hurts, but she'd rather have me give playful spanks when we play than tickle her (and oh how that makes me sad, I love tickling!). Should I equate that to spanking for discipline? Should I equate that to abusive beatings? Hitting is hitting is hitting.......