Does the creation of space and time qualify as a miracle?

[ding]

Does the creation of space and time qualify as a miracle?

Approximately 14 billion years ago all of the matter and energy in the universe popped into existence out of nothing and occupied the space of 1 billionth of 1 trillionth the size of a single atom and then began to expand and cool.

There is no definition of what space, time or the universe is, nor when it began. We know nothing, but speculate much

Are you kidding? There’s tons of evidence.

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

Ummm... red shift, cosmic background radiation, Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. There’s your evidence.

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

 

[ding]

I never knew how emotional you guys would get because science tells us the universe had a beginning.

 

[Rosy]

There is no definition of what space, time or the universe is, nor when it began. We know nothing, but speculate much

Are you kidding? There’s tons of evidence.

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

What exactly does dark matter have to do with red shift, cosmic background radiation and Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter all mathematical theories of the universe fail. Einstein's work means nothing, nothing means anything. All we know for sure is that we are here, but have no idea what here means

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

 

[Rosy]

There is no definition of what space, time or the universe is, nor when it began. We know nothing, but speculate much

Are you kidding? There’s tons of evidence.

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

Ummm... red shift, cosmic background radiation, Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. There’s your evidence.

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

 

[ding]

Are you kidding? There’s tons of evidence.

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

What exactly does dark matter have to do with red shift, cosmic background radiation and Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter all mathematical theories of the universe fail. Einstein's work means nothing, nothing means anything. All we know for sure is that we are here, but have no idea what here means

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

And has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the universe had a beginning.

Do you have any background in science at all?

 

[ding]

Are you kidding? There’s tons of evidence.

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

Ummm... red shift, cosmic background radiation, Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. There’s your evidence.

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

 

[Rosy]

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

What exactly does dark matter have to do with red shift, cosmic background radiation and Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter all mathematical theories of the universe fail. Einstein's work means nothing, nothing means anything. All we know for sure is that we are here, but have no idea what here means

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

And has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the universe had a beginning.

Do you have any background in science at all?

You can not even speculate if the universe had a beginning until you mathematically prove that the universe is real, without dark matter there is no proof.

 

[Rosy]

All of the evidence when put into an equation makes no sense without dark matter. Thus they look for dark matter, well it may not be there because we are assuming that what we see as evidence is real and as such demand that dark matter be real.

Tell me what the real evidence is? of anything?

Ummm... red shift, cosmic background radiation, Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. There’s your evidence.

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

 

[ding]

What exactly does dark matter have to do with red shift, cosmic background radiation and Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter all mathematical theories of the universe fail. Einstein's work means nothing, nothing means anything. All we know for sure is that we are here, but have no idea what here means

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

And has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the universe had a beginning.

Do you have any background in science at all?

You can not even speculate if the universe had a beginning until you mathematically prove that the universe is real, without dark matter there is no proof.

Ummm... yes you can and it isn’t speculation.

Do you even SLoT?

 

[Rosy]

Without dark matter all mathematical theories of the universe fail. Einstein's work means nothing, nothing means anything. All we know for sure is that we are here, but have no idea what here means

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

And has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the universe had a beginning.

Do you have any background in science at all?

You can not even speculate if the universe had a beginning until you mathematically prove that the universe is real, without dark matter there is no proof.

Ummm... yes you can and it isn’t speculation.

Do you even SLoT?

So you know more then the entire Earth science community that needs dark matter to make the theories work.

Gotcha

 

[ding]

Ummm... red shift, cosmic background radiation, Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. There’s your evidence.

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

 

[ding]

Can you show me where dark matter is used in Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations?

Without dark matter the observation that universal expansion is speeding instead of slowing can not be explained, without a mathematical solution to what we seem to see happening neither the universe or anything in it is explainable.

And has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the universe had a beginning.

Do you have any background in science at all?

You can not even speculate if the universe had a beginning until you mathematically prove that the universe is real, without dark matter there is no proof.

Ummm... yes you can and it isn’t speculation.

Do you even SLoT?

So you know more then the entire Earth science community that needs dark matter to make the theories work.

Gotcha

My beliefs are their beliefs.

Where have you been?

 

[Rosy]

Wrong, every equation fails until dark matter is found. That said if it can not be found because it does not exist, obviously all the equations that can not be completed without it are senseless

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

 

[ding]

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

Doesn’t matter. If it is expanding, it had a beginning.

 

[Unkotare]

You should alert the scientific community. They believe that Friedmann’s solutions to Einstein’s field equations show that the universe had a beginning.

Not to mention the SLoT which tells us the same thing.

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

Wrong again. The concept is too much for you.

 

[ding]

Is it my imagination are does being liberal remove the brain’s ability to use reason and logic.

 

[Rosy]

Einstein believed the Universe was a bubble, the Higgs Boson is believed to form all mass from a massless state. Information is now proved to be both here and there at the same time, violating everything Albert said about the speed of light.

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

Doesn’t matter. If it is expanding, it had a beginning.

That logic can only dictate that the current state of expansion had a beginning, not that the expansion was the beginning of the matter that is expanding, or of the area currently containing the expanded mass

 

[ding]

What does that have to with the universe having a beginning?

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

Doesn’t matter. If it is expanding, it had a beginning.

That logic can only dictate that the current state of expansion had a beginning, not that the expansion was the beginning of the matter that is expanding, or of the area currently containing the expanded mass

That’s where the SLoT comes in.

Do you see thermal equilibrium? No. The universe had a beginning.

 

[ding]

Cyclical models are dead. Eventually the universe runs out of usable energy.

 

[Rosy]

Beginning of what? you can't even prove that the universe is real, no one can

Space and time.

Sure we can. The universe is expanding so it had to have a beginning.

Do you have any background in science?

What is the universe expanding into? Since the universe is everything then it must be expanding into itself, if that's true then it was there before it got there

Doesn’t matter. If it is expanding, it had a beginning.

That logic can only dictate that the current state of expansion had a beginning, not that the expansion was the beginning of the matter that is expanding, or of the area currently containing the expanded mass

That’s where the SLoT comes in.

Do you see thermal equilibrium? No. The universe had a beginning.

The Earth and this solar systems beginning was the end of some other supernova mass, thus beginning and end are interchangeable.