🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Does the idiot in Chief owe President Obama an apology?

No, but pretending like it's something that the US has never done in other countries, or that it has;not been happening in the US for many decades, while chewing on your leftie soiled underwear is quite entertaining.
I cant see anybody pretending that the US hasnt done it.
But lets accept that they have, does that make russian interference ok ?
Of course not, but you guys wouldn't be complaining about it if crooked Hillary wouldn't have lost so badly, now would you?
Again you try to deflect. Im not a Clinton fan and definitely not a fan of US foreign policy.
But that is incidental to the Russians trying to subvert your democracy.
Do you think they are entitled to do so ?
The Russians tried as they have for decades, but failed to "subvert our democracy". There is no evidence they affected a single vote in the Rust Belt or anywhere else. The reason it's being highlighted now is they exposed Hillary for the lying crooked politician that she was.


If that's true, why did ALL of the trump minions lie?

And, its time to admit that neither Clinton has broken any laws. Yes, I know you need it the way normal people need air but the nutters have been trying to find proof for 25 years. There is no there there and you just have to pick yourself up and go on.

Why has trump and the minions lied about every single visit with Russians, as well as everything else you can name?
Thats an important point. Why not be open about the meetings ? Why did Flynn and Sessions lie ?
 
I concur with your prediction of the future 'Roudy'!!!

The thing to keep in mind with these Congressional hearings is that if evidence hasn't been fully collated it doesn't enter into the equation. Hense if Comey is aware of illegality in the revised, narrower Oct. FISA warrent, raw data handling but it is only in the process of being investigated he must answer Trump tapping questions with "no information to support".

The disparity of "no evidence to suggest" and "evidence to suggest" is the complex, arduous and lengthy process of fully collating evidence in an investigation. While ongoing investigation exists a "no evidence to suggest" doesn't mean much at all....
KeiserC it is grammatically incorrect to say you "concur WITH ...".

You do not "concur with ...".

You "concur IN ...".
 
No, but pretending like it's something that the US has never done in other countries, or that it has;not been happening in the US for many decades, while chewing on your leftie soiled underwear is quite entertaining.
I cant see anybody pretending that the US hasnt done it.
But lets accept that they have, does that make russian interference ok ?
Of course not, but you guys wouldn't be complaining about it if crooked Hillary wouldn't have lost so badly, now would you?
Again you try to deflect. Im not a Clinton fan and definitely not a fan of US foreign policy.
But that is incidental to the Russians trying to subvert your democracy.
Do you think they are entitled to do so ?
The Russians tried as they have for decades, but failed to "subvert our democracy". There is no evidence they affected a single vote in the Rust Belt or anywhere else. The reason it's being highlighted now is they exposed Hillary for the lying crooked politician that she was.
Whether they did or not is yet to be established. Would you condemn it if it turns out they did ?

Of course I am not a leftie hack like you who gave Hilliary a pass for all her lies, corruption, and deception.
 
Yes there is an idiot and chief that does owe us an apology for lying about not losing my doctor and my healthcare plan; Obama can shove an apology from me up his butt.
 
Why shouldn't other countries believe Trumps accusations US intelligence agencies have been caught spying on our supposed allies.
It's also funny how Democrats are displaying this fake, selective outrage over "Russian meddling" when actually, it was payback for what Hillary and Obama did when they meddled and affected the Ukranian elections and many others, such as Israel.

I love it when politicians act like the US "never does stuff like this", the US is exponentially more guilty than the Russians of this in other countries, going back decades. One example is is over 65 years ago, the Shah of Iran was replaced with a nationalist socialist who wanted to nationalize the oil industry, in a covert CIA operation. In fact, Russia is fairly new to this game, and not half as good as the Americans and the Brits.
Its no secret that you have interfered in many countries affairs over the years.
Are you saying that makes Russian interference ok ?
No, but pretending like it's something that the US has never done in other countries, or that it has;not been happening in the US for many decades, while chewing on your leftie soiled underwear is quite entertaining.
I cant see anybody pretending that the US hasnt done it.
But lets accept that they have, does that make russian interference ok ?


Okay or not, all countries do all they can to keep their secrets -- secret.

That's what is wrong with trump. He has no feelings of patriotism. His only motivation is his bank account.

The trumpkins know this but still voted for him and excuse him.
You speak as though crooked Hillary is a "patriot" who didn't have a private server that she used to hide all her illegal activities using her position as Sec. of State to illicit side deals to fill up her and Bill's pockets with cash.
 
I cant see anybody pretending that the US hasnt done it.
But lets accept that they have, does that make russian interference ok ?
Of course not, but you guys wouldn't be complaining about it if crooked Hillary wouldn't have lost so badly, now would you?
Again you try to deflect. Im not a Clinton fan and definitely not a fan of US foreign policy.
But that is incidental to the Russians trying to subvert your democracy.
Do you think they are entitled to do so ?
The Russians tried as they have for decades, but failed to "subvert our democracy". There is no evidence they affected a single vote in the Rust Belt or anywhere else. The reason it's being highlighted now is they exposed Hillary for the lying crooked politician that she was.


If that's true, why did ALL of the trump minions lie?

And, its time to admit that neither Clinton has broken any laws. Yes, I know you need it the way normal people need air but the nutters have been trying to find proof for 25 years. There is no there there and you just have to pick yourself up and go on.

Why has trump and the minions lied about every single visit with Russians, as well as everything else you can name?
Thats an important point. Why not be open about the meetings ? Why did Flynn and Sessions lie ?
They didn't lie and neither was what Flynn did against the law. Incoming administration members are expected to reach out to their counterparts across the globe. Flynn was interviewed by the FBI and cleared. He was fired because he misrepresented his conversation to Pence.
 
You speak as though crooked Hillary is a "patriot" who didn't have a private server that she used to hide all her illegal activities using her position as Sec. of State to illicit side deals to fill up her and Bill's pockets with cash.

She didn't. And nobody has proven it. Just more Fake News....
 
I concur with your prediction of the future 'Roudy'!!!

The thing to keep in mind with these Congressional hearings is that if evidence hasn't been fully collated it doesn't enter into the equation. Hense if Comey is aware of illegality in the revised, narrower Oct. FISA warrent, raw data handling but it is only in the process of being investigated he must answer Trump tapping questions with "no information to support".

The disparity of "no evidence to suggest" and "evidence to suggest" is the complex, arduous and lengthy process of fully collating evidence in an investigation. While ongoing investigation exists a "no evidence to suggest" doesn't mean much at all....
KeiserC it is grammatically incorrect to say you "concur WITH ...".

You do not "concur with ...".

You "concur IN ...".

Sorry bud,
While when typing fast I,like anyone else, make typos. Grammatical use and denotation are areas where I don't often make mistakes. Thanks though...

con·cur
kənˈkər/
verb
  1. 1.
    be of the same opinion; agree.
    "the authors concurred with the majority"
    synonyms: agree, be in agreement, go along, fall in, be in sympathy; More
  2. 2.
    happen or occur at the same time; coincide.
    "in tests, cytogenetic determination has been found to concur with enzymatic determination"
    synonyms: coincide, be simultaneous, be concurrent, coexist
    "the two events concurred"
 
Grammar police come out when they have nothing to offer.
I concur with your prediction of the future 'Roudy'!!!

The thing to keep in mind with these Congressional hearings is that if evidence hasn't been fully collated it doesn't enter into the equation. Hense if Comey is aware of illegality in the revised, narrower Oct. FISA warrent, raw data handling but it is only in the process of being investigated he must answer Trump tapping questions with "no information to support".

The disparity of "no evidence to suggest" and "evidence to suggest" is the complex, arduous and lengthy process of fully collating evidence in an investigation. While ongoing investigation exists a "no evidence to suggest" doesn't mean much at all....
KeiserC it is grammatically incorrect to say you "concur WITH ...".

You do not "concur with ...".

You "concur IN ...".
 
I cant see anybody pretending that the US hasnt done it.
But lets accept that they have, does that make russian interference ok ?
Of course not, but you guys wouldn't be complaining about it if crooked Hillary wouldn't have lost so badly, now would you?
Again you try to deflect. Im not a Clinton fan and definitely not a fan of US foreign policy.
But that is incidental to the Russians trying to subvert your democracy.
Do you think they are entitled to do so ?
The Russians tried as they have for decades, but failed to "subvert our democracy". There is no evidence they affected a single vote in the Rust Belt or anywhere else. The reason it's being highlighted now is they exposed Hillary for the lying crooked politician that she was.
Whether they did or not is yet to be established. Would you condemn it if it turns out they did ?

Of course I am not a leftie hack like you who gave Hilliary a pass for all her lies, corruption, and deception.

You are lying dude or you are just in denial. Are you forgetting something?
Hillary was never sued or charge with corruption or fraud. The Trump was sued, paid to settle and is currently sued with multiple fraud.
 

God should come down and struck this Jones with throat cancer for publishing a lot of LIES and FAKE NEWS.
You have to be an idiot to listen to this kind of fake news........... Sad.
Yeah, we should get all our news from CNN and MSLSD

CNN is more reliable than Faux News puppeted by Trump.
You say it, so it must be true!
 
That was a long time ago..... and that was just a one time event.
Trump the pathological liar in chief....... Do this in a routine basis. Get real
So a lie about something as important as ones health is just old news for you? Thank God you lost and Trump won. And Obama never stopped lying so get over it.
 
Of course not, but you guys wouldn't be complaining about it if crooked Hillary wouldn't have lost so badly, now would you?
Again you try to deflect. Im not a Clinton fan and definitely not a fan of US foreign policy.
But that is incidental to the Russians trying to subvert your democracy.
Do you think they are entitled to do so ?
The Russians tried as they have for decades, but failed to "subvert our democracy". There is no evidence they affected a single vote in the Rust Belt or anywhere else. The reason it's being highlighted now is they exposed Hillary for the lying crooked politician that she was.
Whether they did or not is yet to be established. Would you condemn it if it turns out they did ?

Of course I am not a leftie hack like you who gave Hilliary a pass for all her lies, corruption, and deception.

You are lying dude or you are just in denial. Are you forgetting something?
Hillary was never sued or charge with corruption or fraud. The Trump was sued, paid to settle and is currently sued with multiple fraud.
Most Americans thought that Hillary was guilty as hell of various crimes, but she got a pass for all of it, because she was the heir to Obama's failed legacy.

Poll: Majority disagree with not charging Hillary Clinton - CNNPolitics.com

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...t-of-dems-think-clinton-deserved-charges.html
 
Will Donald Dumb break his record of being a complete ass ho liar in chief and admit, that Obama did not, I repeat did not wire tap his golden palace after todays hearings and will he then apologize for being a fuckin liar?

FBI Director James Comey Finally Refutes Donald Trump’s ‘Wiretap’ Tweets
“The department has no information that supports those tweets.”


Yes or No

Nope. But the previous idiot in Chief owes the American people a huge apology.

Keep us all posted when he makes good on it Tigeridiot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top