Does this sound crazy to you?

[progressive hunter]

Thanks. That's a perfect example of the crazy shit I'm talking about.

jokes on you dumbass,, behind every law is a gun to force compliance,,

 

[progressive hunter]

And yet, you can't seem to come up with an answer.

the answers in the story you posted,, so if you dont even know whats in your own post you got problems no one can help you with,,

 

[Billiejeens]

if you dont know the answer to those questions youre more fucked in the head than I thought you were,,,

It's unlimited fucked in the head with that one.

 

[Muhammed]

The thread has nothing to do with comparitive harm different gasses might present. Its about portraying a public hearing about a modest proposal

Fuck you. It's not a "modest proposal", jackass party of corruption, oppression and slavery supporter.

 

[Lastamender]

It seems that everything is presented as an imminent threat to our entire country and a means to destroy or way of life. Here's an example.

New York City announced a “notice of public hearing and opportunity to comment on proposed rules.” to discuss a proposed rule change. Note this is just an announcement to discuss the rule, and to give the public an opportunity to understand what the proposed rule would entail, and to publicly comment on the proposal. No rule has been changed, and at this point it can easily be modified or abandoned.

Essentially, the proposed rule is trying to ensure that restaurants using older ovens are aligned with the regulations applied to newer ones. As of May 2016, the city requires that every new stove must have “an emission control device for odors, smoke and particulate matter.” The city estimates that well under 100 restaurants would be impacted by the new rule.

There are several federal and state grants and low interest loans to help the older businesses defray, or possibly eliminate the cost of the upgrade.

I understand reasonable people might disagree on the details of the proposed rule change, and some might oppose it. The purpose of the hearing will be to allow the public the opportunity to add their input to the decision. All considered, it is a modest proposal.

Unfortunately, the modest proposal was presented as anything but that.



Give us pizza or give us death strikes me as a particularly crazy response by right wingers and their broadcasting networks. Fox showed a clip of the above crazy guy, and Hannity even interviewed him on his radio show. Neither of the mentioned sources portrayed the modest proposal as anything less than an attack on the American way of life, an a specific effort to put the 1900 pizza places in New York City out of business. In case you missed it, less than 100 businesses would be effective.

Do you think that is crazy?

I think it is another way of destroying the Middle class and the job opportunities these businesses supply. They want to tank the economy.

 

[sparky]

Do you think that is crazy?

yes.......~S~

 

[OldFlame]

Bulldog, sweetie, I realize you are about as ignorant as a little boy can be, but wanting to protect the little guys against those who want to squash them is actually a LIBERAL principle

This post was ingenious and hilarious, post of the day! I also noticed that he wooshed right past it, wonder why?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Good Lord how do they stand the humiliation?

The lack of self-awareness is evident.

 

[Rambunctious]

Those pies look pretty darn good... now I know what I'm having for dinner....

 

[Marener]

If you FEEL that CO2 is a problem other than the eruptions of the Siberian Traps, you are NUTS.
Water vapor kicks CO2's ass as a "greenhouse gas" across the spectrum.
This whole fucking ILLOGICAL war on the weather is PATHETIC

Guess what controls how much water vapor is in the atmosphere?

Global atmospheric temperatures.

Ever heard of a feedback loop?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Good Lord how do they stand the humiliation?

They don't even realize they should even FEEL humiliated.

Ignorance is strength in their little world.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

A bunch of right wing crazies who are afraid to address the purpose of the thread ranting like grade school children? What would i have to be humiliated about?

Well, at least in your own imbecilic way, you have now established liberalism as "right wing".

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Does anybody remember back in the day when you were young watching Robin Hood and there was this obnoxious kid in the front row of the theater rooting for the Sheriff of Nottingham?

Ladies and Gentlemen, I present you Bulldog.

 

[jackflash]

It seems that everything is presented as an imminent threat to our entire country and a means to destroy or way of life. Here's an example.

New York City announced a “notice of public hearing and opportunity to comment on proposed rules.” to discuss a proposed rule change. Note this is just an announcement to discuss the rule, and to give the public an opportunity to understand what the proposed rule would entail, and to publicly comment on the proposal. No rule has been changed, and at this point it can easily be modified or abandoned.

Essentially, the proposed rule is trying to ensure that restaurants using older ovens are aligned with the regulations applied to newer ones. As of May 2016, the city requires that every new stove must have “an emission control device for odors, smoke and particulate matter.” The city estimates that well under 100 restaurants would be impacted by the new rule.

There are several federal and state grants and low interest loans to help the older businesses defray, or possibly eliminate the cost of the upgrade.

I understand reasonable people might disagree on the details of the proposed rule change, and some might oppose it. The purpose of the hearing will be to allow the public the opportunity to add their input to the decision. All considered, it is a modest proposal.

Unfortunately, the modest proposal was presented as anything but that.



Give us pizza or give us death strikes me as a particularly crazy response by right wingers and their broadcasting networks. Fox showed a clip of the above crazy guy, and Hannity even interviewed him on his radio show. Neither of the mentioned sources portrayed the modest proposal as anything less than an attack on the American way of life, an a specific effort to put the 1900 pizza places in New York City out of business. In case you missed it, less than 100 businesses would be effective.

Do you think that is crazy?

The EPA is not a popular government agency due to the fact that the agency is viewed as intertwined with the religion of environmentalism & it's associated doomsday failed prophecies.

50 failed eco-pocalyptic predictions

With everything that's happening, this has to be the most interesting article/blog post in 2021. Written 2 years ago by Steven J.

www.linkedin.com

A government established MANDATORY COMPLIANCE RELIGION not only violates the American constituencies U.S. Constitution, it also degrades the individuals freedom of choice to abstain from supporting a religion one does not desire to support.

The Religion of Apocalyptic Environmentalism

Apocalyptic environmentalists claim the world might end soon without drastic changes. Sean argues that this movement functions as a religion, like Christianity.

seanmcdowell.org

The FY 2022 EPA fiscal budget cost to the American taxpayer was a whopping $11.2 billion making the EPA an agency too costly to afford for the American taxpayers.

Biden’s FY 2022 EPA Budget: $11.2 Billion with Focus on Environmental Justice and Science | Intelex Blog

The budget advances key priorities, including climate change, environmental justice, public health and supporting and rebuilding the EPA workforce.

blog.intelex.com

Many other problems such as viewing the entire earth as the EPA's domain places the EPA & their buddies in the religion of environmentalism in the 'one world without borders' classification, which is an absolute no-no under any circumstance.

In the year 2017 there was legislation drafted that promoted the abolishment of the EPA by 2018. I agreed with the bill but desired to keep the EPA for interstate river monitoring, the U.S. Coast Guard for offshore water monitoring, & air/land monitoring be the responsibility of each state & territory.

These Four GOP lawmakers want to get rid of the EPA completely

Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida introduced a bill in the House that would terminate the EPA by the end of 2018. Here's who else signed on.

www.nbcnews.com

The EPA has become a power hungry zealot that appears to be more interested in controlling people in the interest of a communal global society, which of course would be the end of civilization upon our planet earth.