Domestic terrorist Stephen Colbert gets called out

The demofks will debate this by saying no one was charged with insurrection. But they fail to realize if no one was charged with it from 1/6, but 1/6 is considered insurrection, so, if we say it is, it is. Just like what they screamed out.
 
Last edited:
Was Congress in session in order to perform a Constitutionally mandated function and was it prevented from doing so by political supporters of a losing candidate?
Trespassing is banal; interceding in a fundamentally crucial process of the Republic is not. To even compare them is reprehensible.
It isn't supporting the Democratic Party to condemn what one saw happening when a mob prevented the Constitution from being fulfilled.
It isn't defending the Republican Party to attempt to diminish the shameful conduct of the idiotic rabble that committed treason.
It isn't a question of "rights". It is a question of being American or seditionist.
 
Was Congress in session in order to perform a Constitutionally mandated function and was it prevented in doing so by political supporters of a losing candidate?
Trespassing is banal; interceding in a fundamentally crucial process of the Republic is not. To even compare them is reprehensible.
It isn't supporting the Democratic Party to condemn what one saw happening when a mob prevented the Constitution from being fulfilled.
It isn't defending the Republican Party to attempt to diminish the shameful conduct of the idiotic rabble that committed treason.
It isn't a question of "rights". It is a question of being American or seditionist.
defending the country isn't insurrection. It also isn't unconstitutional.
 
Was Congress in session in order to perform a Constitutionally mandated function and was it prevented from doing so by political supporters of a losing candidate?
Trespassing is banal; interceding in a fundamentally crucial process of the Republic is not. To even compare them is reprehensible.
It isn't supporting the Democratic Party to condemn what one saw happening when a mob prevented the Constitution from being fulfilled.
It isn't defending the Republican Party to attempt to diminish the shameful conduct of the idiotic rabble that committed treason.
It isn't a question of "rights". It is a question of being American or seditionist.

We don't know yet. Once Colbert's 6/16 insurrection is fully investigated, we may have some answers.
 
Your master, Colbert told you to use the target word, "PUPPET", didn't he? :laughing0301:
You're a good little minion

Funny how Tucker Carlson didn’t mention Triumph the Insult Dog in his commentary

He must think aconserva
We don't know yet. Once Colbert's 6/16 insurrection is fully investigated, we may have some answers.


You mean the Puppet Insurrection?

Sounds like a Stephen King Novel
 
Funny how Tucker Carlson didn’t mention Triumph the Insult Dog in his commentary

He must think aconserva



You mean the Puppet Insurrection?

Sounds like a Stephen King Novel

Ah, yes, the sentient puppet you believe in. ^^^This guy thinks Pinocchio was a documentary.

LOL
 
Here's a good rundown of the crimes Colbert's J16 terrorists are likely guilty of:


In short (based on what we know so far):

Obstruction of an official proceeding:

Civil Disorder

Violent entry, disorderly conduct, entering and remaining in a restricted building, and “parading” in the Capitol

Conspiracy
 
Very much so

Not as funny as Tucker Carlson comparing a Puppet in the hallway to the Jan 6 insurrection…….but pretty damned funny
Because there was no insurrection. They were there to protest the obvious fraud and get it investigated.
 
Here's a good rundown of the crimes Colbert's J16 terrorists are likely guilty of:


In short (based on what we know so far):

Obstruction of an official proceeding:

Civil Disorder

Violent entry, disorderly conduct, entering and remaining in a restricted building, and “parading” in the Capitol

Conspiracy

Do they have special prisons for Puppets?

1655830521099.jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top