Domination

[NYcarbineer]

Enlightening that those who popped up to defend Joseph Stalin are the same drones who regularly defend, apologize for, and excuse Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Obama.

It's only fair that I provide them an opportunity to defend Stalin's blood-brother, Herr Schicklgruber.



Communism was not the only spawn of Karl Marx's doctrine. So was Germany's version, Nazism.

6. “Nazism was the product of German culture, grown out of a German context. The Holocaust could not have occurred in Italy, because Italians are not Germans. And in America, where hostility to big government is central to the national character, the case for statism must be made in terms of 'pragmatism' and decency. In other words, our fascism must be nice and for your own good.


.... fascism, communism, and progressivism are all closely related to one another. The progressive U.S. President Woodrow Wilson was a devoted disciple of the German philosopher Georg Hegel, whose ideas -also had a profound influence on Karl Marx.




Mussolini, for his part, carried with him a medallion of Marx.

Progressives commonly saw Mussolini’s project and Lenin’s as linked enterprises. The progressive muckraking journalist Lincoln Steffens referred to the “Russian-Italian” method as if the two were flip sides of the same coin. Steffens and his fellow progressives generally saw Mussolini, Lenin, and Stalin as three men pursuing a similar objective...





American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks

She tells this lie about once a week now.

As Hitler himself said:

"Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key with which to comprehend the inner, and consequently real, aims of Social Democracy.

The erroneous conceptions of the aim and meaning of this party fall from our eyes like veils, once we come to know this people, and from the fog and mist of social phrases rises the leering grimace of Marxism."

Just like PoliticalChic, EXACTLY like PoliticalChic, Hitler drew no distinction between Democratic Socialism and Marxism.

How many times have we heard her make that proclamation in one form or another?

lol, the only difference is PC knows enough to leave out the Jew part in her rants, whatever her true sentiments on that aspect of her views on Marxism might be.

Psssstt....very much like you, Hitler was a liar.




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.


2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der NationalsozialistischeDeutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the NationalSocialistGerman Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?"
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian

Hitler lied about hating the Jews and hating democracy?

lol, that's your best one yet.

Let me show you why your pal Jonah Goldberg thinks you're an idiot.

Communism is a branch of socialism (And so are National Socialism and Fascism).

And I would love it if more people recognized that the great murderous regimes of the 20th century all did their killing in the name of one flavor or another of socialism.

But social democracy is also a branch of socialism and it is simply unfair not to draw meaningful distinctions. Tony Blair calls himself a socialist as have pretty much all members of the British Labor Party going back a hundred years.

But they are not all Stalinists.

Read more at: Socialism v. Liberalism v. Communism, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hitler AND Stalin abhorred democracy,

as 'mob rule'.

Where's the 'we hate mob rule' crowd in America today? Oh, yes,

Conservatism.

Hated this sort of 'mob'???
"It's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
Barack Obama

1. While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.
2. The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
   1. In fact, an easy way to identify a conservative, is to look for the folks who aren’t afraid to be sneered at by “The Daily Show” and the other temples of the status-anxious. Conservatives are not susceptible to groupthink. Jon Stewart transmits the party line to idiots so they know who to hate. The act of applauding a joke rather than laughing at it is a public gesture that serves no purpose other than assuring everyone that you are part of the group. See "Demonic," chapter 14, Coulter
   2. People desperate for a badge of identity are highly susceptible to groupthink, in fierce need of a ‘guide,’ and, so, the “foolish, ignorant, and envious persons are freed from the sense of their insignificance and powerlessness.” Le Bon, “The Crowd: A Study of The Popular Mind,” p.22.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

1. Did you find any inaccuracy here:

Roosevelt had willed Europe to Stalin, and made certain that Soviet Communism emerged victorious over his sibling, national socialism, Nazism. And, late in Roosevelt's term, he acceded to Stalin's wish for an international governing body....the United Nations with a Bolshevik spy as its first secretary-general.

Yawn... and she's back to the Bircher Crazy.

Hey, here's the thing. FDR and Churchill were NOT IN A POSITION to tell Stalin what he could do in Eastern Europe. The reality was, 1) Most of the countries there were Hitler's allies, so fuck them and 2) The Soviets were actually doing most of the heavy lifting in the European Theater of the war.

3. Communist party members throughout Europe were ordered to sabotage their nation's forces, and aid the Nazi attackers. The French Communist Party, July 1940: "It is comforting to see workers talking to German soldiers as friends,...'well done, comrades, and keep it up,' ...the brotherhood of man will not be forever a hope, it will become a living reality."

Guess who ordered that?

That sword cuts both ways. the main reason why the West gave in to Hitler at Munich was because they thought he would be a foil to Stalin. You see, the West was a lot more afraid of Stalin than Hitler all the way up until the war started. Hitler and Mussolini initially called their alliance the "Anti-Comintern Pact"... in short, they were going to oppose what Stalin was doing and the west was largely good with that and appeased the shit out of them taking Albania and Ethiopia and Austria and Czechoslovakia. Not to mention what the Axis was doing in Spain against the Communist/Republican forces.

It wasn't until Hitler and Stalin cut a deal to dismember Poland that alliances shifted. And even then, up until the point Hitler overran the west, there was always that hope they could turn him and Stalin against each other.

By the time that happened, though, we found we needed Stalin to beat Hitler.

Way to factual and easy to understand for the conspiracy theorist attempting to demonize what has been come to be known as "the greatest generation" and one of the greatest Presidents.

FDR was an evil man who slowly walked this country into a war. I'm not saying that Japan didn't deserve to get nuked but it is a fact that FDR pushed for war as far back as 1936 just like a lot of other politicians. A lot of other countries might of thought that his tough talk meant he was gearing up for war which might have esculated the situation. This was not a good person and not a man of peace.

 

[Camp]

“Nazism was the product of German culture, grown out of a German context. The Holocaust could not have occurred in Italy, because Italians are not Germans. And in America, where hostility to big government is central to the national character, the case for statism must be made in terms of 'pragmatism' and decency. In other words, our fascism must be nice and for your own good.

The Holocaust happened because anti-semitism is hard wired into German Culture. The father of German Protestantism, Martin Luther, wrote a book called "The Jews and their lies". This was hundreds of years before Das Kapital and Mein Kampf

Thank God you read one book out of millions on anti-semitism. That makes you an expert.

Ya, because a book by Luther from the 16th Century is just another book about antisemitism. Sounds like you don't know who Luther was or much about history. If you did you would know "The Jews and Their Lies" is not just another book. It was one of the most influential books in world history.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

 

[PoliticalChic]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And now, the effect of totalism on the fabric of society....


7. The pattern has been repeated ad infinitum....communism, Nazism, socialism, Liberalism, either kills or make cowards and cuckolds of the masses.

There is a ready acceptance of Islamist movements, as Islam means almost the same thing as 'domination,' ...it means 'submission.'
In fact, there is a description of Liberals, summarized as 'the Progressive-Islamist Alliance.'



In Northern Europe, where socialism had been embraced early on, the masses were beaten down so far that manhood has been largely expunged: Scandinavian men are forced to accept the rapes and harassment of their women by hordes of Middle Eastern men brought in by the Socialist governments.


a. "Sweden's population grew from 9 million to 9.5 million in the years 2004-2012, mainly due toimmigration from "countries like Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia".
Sweden now has the second highest number of rapes in the world, after South Africa, which at 53.2 per 100,000 is six times higher than the United States. Statistics now suggest that 1 out of every 4 Swedish womenwill be raped.

...Muslims representedin as many as 77 percentof the rape cases and a major increase in rape cases paralleling a major increase in Muslim immigration,the wages of Muslim immigration are proving to be asexual assault epidemic by a misogynistic ideology."
1 in 4 Swedish Women Will Be Raped as Sexual Assaults Increase 500%



b. "Rape jihad in Denmark: More than half of all convicted rapists have immigrant backgrounds. Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis dramatically overrepresented…
...100 percentof convicted rapists in Oslo have non-Western background. According to the Oslo police, non-Western immigrants rape because they are brought up with a view of women that makes them more likely to become rapists. It would be more precise to say thatthey just follow their religion, which allows them to rape non-Muslim women."
Rape jihad in Denmark: More than half of all convicted rapists have immigrant backgrounds. Iraqis, Iranians, Turks and Somalis dramatically overrepresented…

 

[NYcarbineer]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

 

[PoliticalChic]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

There's that give-away!

When you recognize that you've been destroyed.....utterly eviscerated.....you lapse into vulgarity.


I love making you crawl......doggie treat?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

And, he's actually correct. Goes completely against liberalism but it's still correct.

 

[Camp]

1. Did you find any inaccuracy here:

Roosevelt had willed Europe to Stalin, and made certain that Soviet Communism emerged victorious over his sibling, national socialism, Nazism. And, late in Roosevelt's term, he acceded to Stalin's wish for an international governing body....the United Nations with a Bolshevik spy as its first secretary-general.

Yawn... and she's back to the Bircher Crazy.

Hey, here's the thing. FDR and Churchill were NOT IN A POSITION to tell Stalin what he could do in Eastern Europe. The reality was, 1) Most of the countries there were Hitler's allies, so fuck them and 2) The Soviets were actually doing most of the heavy lifting in the European Theater of the war.

3. Communist party members throughout Europe were ordered to sabotage their nation's forces, and aid the Nazi attackers. The French Communist Party, July 1940: "It is comforting to see workers talking to German soldiers as friends,...'well done, comrades, and keep it up,' ...the brotherhood of man will not be forever a hope, it will become a living reality."

Guess who ordered that?

That sword cuts both ways. the main reason why the West gave in to Hitler at Munich was because they thought he would be a foil to Stalin. You see, the West was a lot more afraid of Stalin than Hitler all the way up until the war started. Hitler and Mussolini initially called their alliance the "Anti-Comintern Pact"... in short, they were going to oppose what Stalin was doing and the west was largely good with that and appeased the shit out of them taking Albania and Ethiopia and Austria and Czechoslovakia. Not to mention what the Axis was doing in Spain against the Communist/Republican forces.

It wasn't until Hitler and Stalin cut a deal to dismember Poland that alliances shifted. And even then, up until the point Hitler overran the west, there was always that hope they could turn him and Stalin against each other.

By the time that happened, though, we found we needed Stalin to beat Hitler.

Way to factual and easy to understand for the conspiracy theorist attempting to demonize what has been come to be known as "the greatest generation" and one of the greatest Presidents.

FDR was an evil man who slowly walked this country into a war. I'm not saying that Japan didn't deserve to get nuked but it is a fact that FDR pushed for war as far back as 1936 just like a lot of other politicians. A lot of other countries might of thought that his tough talk meant he was gearing up for war which might have esculated the situation. This was not a good person and not a man of peace.

FDR did not walk us into war. He like many others knew war as coming and prepared for it, despite the efforts of isolationist and America Firsters to promote hiding from reality. What is the evidence that FDR and others knew the war was coming? Perhaps if you knew history away from the conspiracy theory partisan nonsense of the type PoliticalChic spews, you would know who Marshall Ferdinand Foch was and how he continuously promoted his certainty of a coming war the entire decade of the 1920's. In addition, H. C. Bywater published two books predicting war with Japan in the Pacific. The first was in 1921 called Sea Power in the Pacific and the second was in 1925 called The Great Pacific War.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

And, he's actually correct. Goes completely against liberalism but it's still correct.

It even goes beyond that.

Conservatives bitch constantly about 'democracy', 'mob rule', 'tyranny of the majority';

whatever else that is, it is code for support for some system of rule by the minority, by the few, or by a dictator.

Conservatism by its nature is anti-democratic.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

There's that give-away!

When you recognize that you've been destroyed.....utterly eviscerated.....you lapse into vulgarity.


I love making you crawl......doggie treat?

Winning, the PC way...

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

Not that any proof was needed, of course; the notion that 'liberals' advocate for a 'dictatorship' is a prima facie lie.

 

[initforme]

So who is more to blame for socialism or communism in the us? The fact that candidates who are socialists or the fact that their support is growing? Ate voters to blame as well? I like trump myself if I by chance vote. What do I try to tell my neighbors, both quite successful, who have sanders signs?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

And, he's actually correct. Goes completely against liberalism but it's still correct.

It even goes beyond that.

Conservatives bitch constantly about 'democracy', 'mob rule', 'tyranny of the majority';

whatever else that is, it is code for support for some system of rule by the minority, by the few, or by a dictator.

Conservatism by its nature is anti-democratic.

Democracy, at least anything like pure democracy, is a terrible idea. We aren't a democracy, for good reason, but the reasons start with keeping the pitchforks in their proper place, the fields. Not understanding that means you don't understand anything of American history from 1789 on.

 

[JoeB131]

Thank God you read one book out of millions on anti-semitism. That makes you an expert.

Do try to follow the argument before you speak up, okay? I mean, the Mail Order Bride is a crazy person, so she gets a pass.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Thank God you read one book out of millions on anti-semitism. That makes you an expert.

Do try to follow the argument before you speak up, okay? I mean, the Mail Order Bride is a crazy person, so she gets a pass.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

[




1. ".... Nazi Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one. And ... socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship.

So unless a liberal supports dictatorship, he or she cannot be a Socialist?

Now, what did I teach you about the proper usage of "So.." at the start of a sentence?

Sorry..but you get another failing grade.

Since I just proved that you can't name any American liberals who support dictatorship, I don't really give a fuck what crackpot notions about grammar and usage you have .

And, he's actually correct. Goes completely against liberalism but it's still correct.

It even goes beyond that.

Conservatives bitch constantly about 'democracy', 'mob rule', 'tyranny of the majority';

whatever else that is, it is code for support for some system of rule by the minority, by the few, or by a dictator.

Conservatism by its nature is anti-democratic.

It's also inconsistent.

Conservatives, for the most part, will argue in favor of the 'will of the people' when the people act in a manner rightists approve of – such as conservative advocacy that women be compelled by the state to give birth against their will, or measures denying same-sex couples access to marriage law they're eligible to participate in, as a consequence of the 'will of the people.'

But the 'will of the people' goes out the window when the people act in a manner that conservatives disapprove of, such as gun control measures.

Conservatives can't have it both ways – if the people are wrong to enact a given gun control measure because it violates the Second Amendment, then the people are likewise wrong when the seek to deny a woman her right to privacy, or gay Americans their right to equal protection of the law, in violation of the 14th Amendment.

 

[JoeB131]

2. ... the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der NationalsozialistischeDeutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: the NationalSocialistGerman Workers' Party ... what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?"

Except it really wasn't socialism after a certain point. That point was during the Night of the Long Knives when Hitler eliminated Roehm and the SA and other "revolutionary" elements within the NSDAP and cooperated with the military and industrialists. So oddly, the Krupps and the other big industries in Germany were suddenly totally good with Hitler.

Another big admirer of Hitler was Henry Ford, one of the bastions of American Capitalism.

Washingtonpost.com: Ford and GM Scrutinized for Alleged Nazi Collaboration