I said Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival. I didn't say Trump said quid pro quo. Is English not your first language?Here's the "witness testimony"...LOLOLHe was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.
Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.
The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.
That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.
The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
What the fuck is that?
Are you agreeing with me that there is no evidence of a quid pro quo?
That is right and that is a bribe.... GOP are trying to do what they did last time, invent there own law and there own burned of proof of that law...