DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

[oreo]

"The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding. "

"Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey, Hey, Hey
GOOD-BYE!"

Go to jail. Go DIRECTLY to Jail. Do NOT pass 'Go'. Do NOT collect $200. Do NOT Win the DNC Nomination. Do NOT continue Campaigning. Do NOT get put on the ballot. DO go down as the 1st 1st Lady to Go to Jail for NUMEROUS Felonies - crimes under the ESPIONAGE Act and for CORRUPTION Charges!

------

Selling Russia 1/5th of the US uranium Stockpile.

Caught and stopped TRYING to sell the Russians several of the Aleutian Islands & their mineral rights.

Caught taking contributions from foreign millionaire whose company she protected from legal punishment for violating Iranian Sanctions - running illegal goods to Iran - WHILE she served as Secretary of State ('Corruption'/'Influence Peddling)

Taking millions from Islamic nations that finance and support terrorism.

Taking millions from Islamic nations that oppress women, engage in female genital mutilation, and who murder homosexuals.

Hiring an AL QAEIDA-associated Militia to protect a US Ambassador.

Abandoning a US Ambassador in a hostile environment amidst terrorist threats that forced EVERY other nation with people in Benghazi to pull them out.

REJECTING OVER 600 pleas for additional security from the on-site US Ambassador AND TAKING AWAY 14 members of the Ambassador's security detail in the midst of these threats, a call for his assassination, AND after 2 previous terror attacks on his compound, the last of which before his murder left a 4-foot hole in his compound wall.

Denying UNDER OATH she knew what happened that night, ONLY to have HER OWN E-MAILS expose she told the Turkish Ambassador after the 13-hour attack that resulted in 4 Americans dead that she KNEW the video had nothing to do with the attack, that this was a terrorist attack; revealed that she told her own daughter that this was a terrorist attack; then told the world and the grieving families it was all about a video...thern ended up calling the grieving families 'Liars'!

Broke the law by not signing the required legal document, upon getting her security clearance required to do the job as Secretary of State, stating she had received her classification training.

Violated Administration rules and the law by not providing copies of ALL State Dept-related documents and e-mails to the State Dept for required recording/holding. The State Dept made it clear Hillary did NOT turn over all documents AS SHE CLAIMED UNDER OATH TO HAVE DONE.

Lied under oath about not using a legal private server, using MULTIPLE electronic devices (not just 'one'), and about NOT sending / receiving classified information. She later changed her statement to cover ass by saying she had not sent/received an e-mails / documents MARKED classified.
-- Since then the FBI has evidence that Hillary ordered subordinates to strip the classification markings off documents and to send them vis UNCLASS means for the sake of 'ease' and 'expedience'. These workers have stated this was not a 1-time thing but was almost 'SOP'! Thatm btw, is a CRIME.

Illegal handling, storage, and attempted destruction of Classified / EXTREMELY classified information capable of seriously damaging our national security.
- The company handling her server, which illegally had different / multiple classifications of information on 1 server (illegal) - did not have the appropriate legal clearance to hold/store/handle the classified information.
- Her lawyer was walking around with a USB drive that contained highly classified information without a security clearance, violating laws regarding handling, transporting, and storage of classified information.

Hillary broke the law by not signing the Federal Document stating she had released / returned all security documents and that she was keeping none of them (according to one report), which is a crime. If she DID sign the document, in light of all the classified State Dept-related information found in her position, she broke the law for keeping all this classified information.
-- Once you quit/step down/leave a job/program dealing with COMPARTMENTALIZED Highly Classified information the business/organization 'READS YOU OUT' of the program. From that point on it is ILLEGAL for you to have access to the information let alone have any of it in your possession!!!! The FBI just confirmed Hillary has / had compartmentalized Highly Classified info in her possession...ILLEGALLY.

(If they wanted to press it and make the case, considering her dealings with Russia and taking money from Islamic countries and others - such as the guy she 'helped' violate US Sanctions on Iran, a case of possible TREASON / REAL 'ESPIONAGE' could me made. (Not that it would stick, but it could be made...)

NOW the FBI is reporting that the information Hillary has / had in her possession was / is SO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED AND DANGEROUS TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY that they CAN'T even REDACT it enough to release ANY of it!

HOLY CR@P! Stick a fork in her. SHE IS DONE! There is NO WAY the DOJ and / or Obama could possibly refuse to call for a Grand Jury / agree to indict her! Doing so to protect Ex-Atty General Eric Holder for multiple counts of Felony Perjury while attempting to keep Obama's 'Fast and Furious' scandal buried was easy to pull off because his criminal acts did not rise to the level of being capable of 'seriously causing damage to our national security'! Hillary, though? She'll be lucky if ALL they charge her with is 'NEGLIGENCE' under the Esionage Act!

The emails in question were NOT classified at the time of receipt or transmission. Said emails were classified after the fact.

No violation.

Are you talking about the 22 emails they found, they can't release. Because it would threaten our national security?

None of which were classified at the time.

A MUST READ:
5 myths about classified information

"And while the number of original classification decisions is on the wane, there were still almost 50,000 new secrets created last year – on top of the 2 million created in the 10 previous years. "

Q: If something isn't a govt. secret in 2010, but in 2015 the FBI deems a piece of information now sensitive - or upgrades it to Top Secret, is a person handling that information then expected to be a clairvoyant?

22 emails cannot be released to the public cause it will threaten our national security. So that is okay to be on a private email?

You don't know that those e-mails have anything to do with National Security. She could have be sending a nasty gram to one of her underling's at the State Department and the State Department doesn't want those released, and referred to them as too damaging to be released.

FURTHERMORE: What FBI investigation have you ever witnessed released this kind of information, before the investigation was finished? You're getting this news from FOX NEWS & right wing talk radio--who brings on the typical retired FBI agent that comes on the show and starts feeding the Reich wing with hearsay and conjecture.

Like with Bill Clinton and his mountain of FBI investigations--they turned out to be NOTHING except one and that was lying about Monica Lewinsky. He got his hand slapped lost his license to practice law for a period of time and walked out of there.

And again--you have swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker. You have all gone into Reich wing hysterical mode- & it will come back and slap you down hard.

HILLARY CLINTON HAS requested already that these 22 emails be released. That should tell you something--DAH-DUH.

 

[Arianrhod]

I almost always cite the source of the information I post, just not always the exact link to the exact page...

Not that it matters.

Because you're hoping to creating enough of a smokescreen so no one will notice that the majority of your sources are nonsense? Doesn't seem to be working for you.

But since you don't know whether 2015 comes before or after 2010, you're right: What you post doesn't matter.

 

[Meathead]

I highly doubt if she will be going to jail even if she IS a criminal POS. I just cannot believe anyone would still consider her a "valid" candidate. Any of those people being paraded around in front of us. They are all part of the machine. Look at some 3rd party candidates, PLEASE!!!

Hillary is currently the only valid candidate in either party

Congrats, you have won the prize for 'least credible', which is saying something since your competition is Daws, Care, & G5000.

By any criteria...Hillary is the most qualified in the race

Nixon was certainly the most qualified politician for the presidency of his generation, but then Hillary is more Nixonian than Nixon himself.

 

[easyt65]

I highly doubt if she will be going to jail even if she IS a criminal POS. I just cannot believe anyone would still consider her a "valid" candidate. Any of those people being paraded around in front of us. They are all part of the machine. Look at some 3rd party candidates, PLEASE!!!

Hillary is currently the only valid candidate in either party

Congrats, you have won the prize for 'least credible', which is saying something since your competition is Daws, Care, & G5000.

By any criteria...Hillary is the most qualified in the race

Link?
Never mind. Since you pulled that out of your southern oraffice one is not required...

 

[rightwinger]

What it will take to.....Send Hillary to JAIL

Hillary was warned not to use a private server and did so anyway
Hillary intentionally sent classified material to an unclassified source

Beyond that...the best Republicans have is a security violation and that violation would be against her agency for allowing it

 

[bravoactual]

OK ConJobs, don't get your frillies in a twist.

There is no conclusive proof that Ms. Clinton, at the time the email(s) were receipted knew said emails were classified.

There is no conclusive proof that Ms. Clinton either by act or by intention transmit or have cause to transmit classified information.

The emails in question were classified after the fact. Ms. Clinton did not break the law.

 

[easyt65]

Considering all the laws listed and proof that she violated so many, your opinions are hilarious.

 

[bravoactual]

I highly doubt if she will be going to jail even if she IS a criminal POS. I just cannot believe anyone would still consider her a "valid" candidate. Any of those people being paraded around in front of us. They are all part of the machine. Look at some 3rd party candidates, PLEASE!!!

Hillary is currently the only valid candidate in either party

Congrats, you have won the prize for 'least credible', which is saying something since your competition is Daws, Care, & G5000.

By any criteria...Hillary is the most qualified in the race

Link?
Never mind. Since you pulled that out of your southern oraffice one is not required...

In other words, you ain't got nothing.

 

[bravoactual]

Considering all the laws listed and proof that she violated so many, your opinions are hilarious.

What specific law was violated and when.

The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED when Ms. Clinton received them.

 

[bravoactual]

What it will take to.....Send Hillary to JAIL

Hillary was warned not to use a private server and did so anyway
Hillary intentionally sent classified material to an unclassified source

Beyond that...the best Republicans have is a security violation and that violation would be against her agency for allowing it

Karl Rove used a R.N.C. server for White House Emails, RePugs did not do squat.

 

[Rocko]

Considering all the laws listed and proof that she violated so many, your opinions are hilarious.

It's astonishing. Hilary definitely broke the law. If I was a supporter I'd keep my mouth shut.

 

[bravoactual]

It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...

What specific law was broken and when was it broken.

The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.

 

[easyt65]

'Hillary didn't break the law cause her e-mails were clasified after the fact. Must be true because Hillary said so...and all the Libs continue to repeat it as if it were true, which it isn't.

 

[Arianrhod]

It's astonishing. Hilary definitely broke the law.

What's astonishing is that you think 2010 comes after 2015.

 

[easyt65]

It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...

What specific law was broken and when was it broken.

The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.

What specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.

 

[Arianrhod]

'Hillary didn't break the law cause her e-mails were clasified after the fact. Must be true because...

...2015 comes after 2010.

 

[leftwinger]

What it will take to.....Send Hillary to JAIL

Hillary was warned not to use a private server and did so anyway
Hillary intentionally sent classified material to an unclassified source

Beyond that...the best Republicans have is a security violation and that violation would be against her agency for allowing it

"now you are starting to get it".

a.) Before start the job, training on how to do it "right" and 1hr on SAP (codewords etc.) with FBI.
She then went off and did her own thing................because she could. sound familiar?

b.) on way out.....required to give back all and sign forms stating same. This does not mean DELETE what you don't want to give back.

c.) told not to hire some hack, employed him anyways and corresponded back/forth with govt docs.

 

[Arianrhod]

So, RWs, how long will you keep exciting yourselves over the prospect that Hillary will be indicted and jailed (there doesn't seem to be any mention of a trial in any of your fantasies) before it dawns on you that you got it wrong...again?

At least all that jumping up and down gets you off the couch...

 

[easyt65]

It's astonishing. Hilary definitely broke the law.

What's astonishing is that you think 2010 comes after 2015.

Arian you were the one who asked the question.

Arian, what does the year 2010 or 2015 have to do with the fact that she broke the law by storing classified information that was not legally set up to hold such information?

What do they have to do with the fact that she handed over her server and classified e-mails to a company that did not have the legally required clearance to store / maintain classified info?

What do the years matter regarding the fact that she broke the law by not signing documents she was legally required to sign when she received her security clearance and associated training?

What do those years have to do with her Perjurong herself by claiming under oath she only used 2 devices only to reveal later she used more? (This is important because evety device she had was required to be set up a cording to kaw for secure use / handling of clasified.)

You LEMMINGS keep repeating the same Hillary-spewed BS about her e-mails not being classified at the time, but there are SO many other laws she violated involved! It's NOT just about specific e-mails. It's about legal documents, legal set-up of the server and devices, legal handling / transportation / storage / destruction of classified, perjury, ordering subordinates to break the law by stripping classified markings off documents, etc....

It is NOT just about 1 rule / 2010 vs 2015 as you and so many other liberals are trying to limit this scandal to!

 

[Arianrhod]

Arian, what does the year 2010 or 2015 have to do with the fact that she broke the law by storing classified information that was not legally set up to hold such information?

Storing the documents on an unsecured server occurred in 2010.

The law classifying those documents as Classified was passed in 2015.

A third-grader will tell you that 2015 happened after 2010, so anything that was not deemed illegal until 2015 does not retroactively make something that happened in 2010 illegal...no matter how much you really, really, really, really want it to be so.

Well, okay, maybe a third-grader wouldn't use the word "retroactively," but other than that...

So how long before it dawns on you that you're not going to get your wish?