DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

[Redfish]

True. According to former congressman tom delay the FBI is ready to recommend an indictment, and if the DOJ doesn't put together a grand jury for an indictment then the FBI will go public with all the information they have on hillary. Either way it doesn't look good for hillary.

DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.

Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
FBI seeking indictment of Hillary in email scandal, Tom DeLay claims | New York Post

DeLay?
Washington Times?

Can you come up with more unreliable sources?

The only thing RW knows how to say when anyone posts anything negative about libs is 'Your source isn't valid' because that's all Obama, Hillary, and Alynski TAUGHT him to say.

Washington Times is a rightwing rag
Delay is a convicted criminal

and the Washington post is a left wing rag
Hillary is a corrupt lying bitch
whats your point?

 

[bravoactual]

Delay's politically motivated conviction was overturned. Just because you and Hillary say it's true don't make it so.[/QUOT

Just because YOU claim she broke the law, does not mean she broke the law either.

Where is your proof?

 

[leftwinger]

The materials were NOT classified at the time of transmission of the emails. No law was broken.

She was in the job 6 years or more. Impossible to believe nothing classified, top secret, SAP or whatever did not go thru her receive/send during that time? If not, we don't need to pay $50bil/year for the dept. In fact good idea. shut that one down too.

 

[Redfish]

It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...

What specific law was broken and when was it broken.

The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.

What specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.

The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.

You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.

Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?

 

[easyt65]

'Hillary didn't break the law cause her e-mails were clasified after the fact. Must be true because Hillary said so...and all the Libs continue to repeat it as if it were true, which it isn't.

Do you have any specific proof that Ms. Clinton did knowingly and willingly violate the aw?

The materials were NOT classified at the time of transmission of the emails. No law was broken.

Already answered numerous times. She has been proven to have broken numerous laws involving her server, not signing legally required documents, and more. This scandal, the investigation, and her crimes are not limited to specific e-mails as you contiue to try to do. FAIL.

 

[auditor0007]

Those indictments had better fly, or else some folks are gonna look silly.

Why would they look silly now? These "indictments" have been impending for a year according to USMB nutters.

To date, I have not heard of one of these E-mails being classified from the get go. In other words, they were not classified when they were sent. Making them classified after the fact does not constitute the committing of a crime just because Republicans want it to be. Until they show us that Hillary sent known classified E-mails at the time, then there are no grounds for indictment to begin with. If there is no indictment, it will be due to the fact that there are no grounds for indictment, and if that is the case, Hillary will be walking into the White House, because this will backfire on the Republicans in such a big way. The fact is that Republicans have no choice but to hope that something comes about with this, because they know it is their only chance of taking the White House. If Hillary is not indicted, they will get crushed in November, and it's not just going to be the White House that they lose.

 

[Redfish]

No idiot. It is Hillary who has a reputation as a pathological liar, not Issa. See, her problem is that except for a few hacks like yourself, no one believes a thing she says.

But once again, she leading all the nuts on your side in the polls.

Which proves the old adage, the world is divided into fanatics and scoundrels, but you can reason with a scoundrel.

No it just proves liberals will vote for anyone as long as they have a d beside their name. Gruber described you well.

There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that you would vote for anyone with an R behind their name.

Hillary Clinton has already been cleared of any wrong doing by the State Department. The FBI is now sorting through 22 emails, out of thousands that they have already released for the public to view.

HILLARY CLINTON is requesting that these 22 emails be released to the public so they can see--that they weren't a threat to National Security and that they weren't MARKED as Classified when she received them.

Bengazi was investigated 8 TIMES--and she made Republicans look like total idiots in her 13 hours of final testimony. Along with the new movie out 13 hours--which also clears her of any blame or negligence for Bengazi.

You're beating a dead horse to death with these emails, and it will backfire on the Republican Party, like Bengazi has.

This is nothing more than the typical Reich wing dog & pony show--and it's going to implode on the Republican party very quickly.

YOU LIE!

1. The State Dept can't clear her of SHIT in an FBI investigation.

2. The State Dept was the one who exposed she broke the law by not signing leagally required documents regarding handling classified that she never signed.

3. The State Department has already declare e-mails being recovered from Hillary's server were NEVER given to them, which she was required by law to do and which she falsely testified she had done.

You L I E......or terribly mistaken...

In addition: SHE WAS THE STATE DEPARTMENT, SHE WAS SECRETARY OF STATE. SHE CAN'T PRETEND THAT SOMEONE ELSE ABOVE HER GAVE PERMISSION-------------THERE WAS NO ONE ABOVE HER AT STATE.

winger thinks my post was funny but could not refute a word of it. typical left wing moron.

 

[Redfish]

Those indictments had better fly, or else some folks are gonna look silly.

Why would they look silly now? These "indictments" have been impending for a year according to USMB nutters.

To date, I have not heard of one of these E-mails being classified from the get go. In other words, they were not classified when they were sent. Making them classified after the fact does not constitute the committing of a crime just because Republicans want it to be. Until they show us that Hillary sent known classified E-mails at the time, then there are no grounds for indictment to begin with. If there is no indictment, it will be due to the fact that there are no grounds for indictment, and if that is the case, Hillary will be walking into the White House, because this will backfire on the Republicans in such a big way. The fact is that Republicans have no choice but to hope that something comes about with this, because they know it is their only chance of taking the White House. If Hillary is not indicted, they will get crushed in November, and it's not just going to be the White House that they lose.

bullshit

 

[Arianrhod]

Does 2015 come before or after 2010?

She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.

Nope.

 

[leftwinger]

To date, I have not heard of one of these E-mails being classified from the get go. In other words, they were not classified when they were sent. Making them classified after the fact does not constitute the committing of a crime just because Republicans want it to be. Until they show us that Hillary sent known classified E-mails at the time, then there are no grounds for indictment to begin with. If there is no indictment, it will be due to the fact that there are no grounds for indictment, and if that is the case, Hillary will be walking into the White House, because this will backfire on the Republicans in such a big way. The fact is that Republicans have no choice but to hope that something comes about with this, because they know it is their only chance of taking the White House. If Hillary is not indicted, they will get crushed in November, and it's not just going to be the White House that they lose.

Easy....time to shut down this thread. They don't read the other posts and simply go round and round in circles to defend. All these points may have been gone over weeks ago? The SPIN LIE IGNORE facts to make you post it all again and again. Then a new batch show up and ask to go over it again.

for example: SHE asked for classified header removed so they could send over insecure server. yet many many many keep saying.........."they not marked, no harm no foul".

ah......the depravity of the liberal in here is a deep dark sickness incurable disease.

 

[Redfish]

Does 2015 come before or after 2010?

She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.

Nope.

no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?

 

[Silhouette]

Sending Hillary to jail would be like sending Kim Davis to jail....it's an act that will backfire and cause people to consider the perps (the GOP, everyone knows it) as repugnant. In an election year no less. There is a way to clearly beat ANY democratic candidate and the email/Benghazi way is not it. I almost wonder if the dems are behind the push to persecute the dems?...lol.. clever if true...

 

[Redfish]

Sending Hillary to jail would be like sending Kim Davis to jail....it's an act that will backfire and cause people to consider the perps (the GOP, everyone knows it) as repugnant. In an election year no less. There is a way to clearly beat ANY democratic candidate and the email/Benghazi way is not it. I almost wonder if the dems are behind the push to persecute the dems?...lol.. clever if true...

I would like for her to go to jail, but for now being declared ineligible to run for pres will be sufficient.

 

[rightwinger]

I highly doubt if she will be going to jail even if she IS a criminal POS. I just cannot believe anyone would still consider her a "valid" candidate. Any of those people being paraded around in front of us. They are all part of the machine. Look at some 3rd party candidates, PLEASE!!!

Hillary is currently the only valid candidate in either party

AND YOU ARE INSANE IF YOU BELIEVE THAT.

Cap lock does not improve your case

Hillary's credentials far exceed any Republican. You are welcome to provide the credentials of any Republican with better experience

 

[Arianrhod]

Does 2015 come before or after 2010?

She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.

Nope.

no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?

THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.

 

[Iceweasel]

Does 2015 come before or after 2010?

She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.

Nope.

no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?

THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.

Wrong.

Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server
Hillary Clinton’s campaign has repeatedly pushed back on the idea that any of the emails she sent using her personal email system while serving as Secretary of State were classified top secret.

Back in November, for example, campaign spokesperson Brian Fallon tweeted out a link to a Politico report suggesting that early findings that some of her emails contained highly classified material were wrong. Maybe Fallon was just sharing, not endorsing, and the exclamation points he included in his tweet were just there to demonstrate his surprise at the story.

In any case, it turns out that the report was wrong, and Clinton did indeed send at least 22 emails classified as top secret, according to an Associated Press report this afternoon.


These emails were classified as “special access programs,” according to Politico, which means they were compartmentalized within the top secret designation; even top secret clearance wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get someone access to these communications.

The State Department has slowly making Clinton’s emails public over the last few months, following a court order, but not complying with it fully: A federal judge had ordered the emails to be completely released by the end of today, but instead, only about 1,000 of the 9,000 remaining pages of email will be released later tonight.

So far, about 1,300 of Clinton’s emails have been labeled classified at some level. Today was the first time, however, that any had been confirmed to be classified top secret. So far, classified emails have been redacted for release. The top secret emails revealed today won’t be released in any way; they’ll simply be withheld.

 

[leftwinger]

You are welcome to provide the credentials of any Republican with better experience

That is the problem this year. America has decided they do NOT want "experience" in gaming the system or how to bend the rules. We want someone to go FIX the corrupt system not build on it.

 

[leftwinger]

Does 2015 come before or after 2010?

She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.

Nope.

no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?

THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.

Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.

I never have put anyone on IGNORE (including sports boards)......just sayin' emails come and go every day. Not only from 2010. Sweet Lord of Christmas......help me.

 

[easyt65]

To date, I have not heard of one of these E-mails being classified from the get go. In other words, they were not classified when they were sent. Making them classified after the fact does not constitute the committing of a crime just because Republicans want it to be. Until they show us that Hillary sent known classified E-mails at the time, then there are no grounds for indictment to begin with. If there is no indictment, it will be due to the fact that there are no grounds for indictment, and if that is the case, Hillary will be walking into the White House, because this will backfire on the Republicans in such a big way. The fact is that Republicans have no choice but to hope that something comes about with this, because they know it is their only chance of taking the White House. If Hillary is not indicted, they will get crushed in November, and it's not just going to be the White House that they lose.

Easy....time to shut down this thread. They don't read the other posts and simply go round and round in circles to defend. All these points may have been gone over weeks ago? The SPIN LIE IGNORE facts to make you post it all again and again. Then a new batch show up and ask to go over it again.

for example: SHE asked for classified header removed so they could send over insecure server. yet many many many keep saying.........."they not marked, no harm no foul".

ah......the depravity of the liberal in here is a deep dark sickness incurable disease.

I'm with you, num - time to shut 'er down. You just can't fix stupid or hyper-partisanship, as they have proved. (They will be arguing her innocense as she is escorted to her cell.) And if you argue with an idiot, passers-by often can't tell who is who. Following your lead, I'm out.

 

[rightwinger]

DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.

Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
FBI seeking indictment of Hillary in email scandal, Tom DeLay claims | New York Post

DeLay?
Washington Times?

Can you come up with more unreliable sources?

The only thing RW knows how to say when anyone posts anything negative about libs is 'Your source isn't valid' because that's all Obama, Hillary, and Alynski TAUGHT him to say.

Washington Times is a rightwing rag
Delay is a convicted criminal

and the Washington post is a left wing rag
Hillary is a corrupt lying bitch
whats your point?

The Washington Post is one of the most honored papers in our country. The Washington Times is a rag with no credibility

It is embarrassing for you to compare the two