Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sending Hillary to jail would be like sending Kim Davis to jail....it's an act that will backfire and cause people to consider the perps (the GOP, everyone knows it) as repugnant. In an election year no less. There is a way to clearly beat ANY democratic candidate and the email/Benghazi way is not it. I almost wonder if the dems are behind the push to persecute the dems?...lol.. clever if true...
Yeah but that looks heavy-handed and well-timed..dontcha think? It will backfire.. Trust me. Let her run. It doesn't matter if the GOP employs the one topic I'm thinking about...no democrat could win..I would like for her to go to jail, but for now being declared ineligible to run for pres will be sufficient.
Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...
What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...
What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
Wrong.Does 2015 come before or after 2010?
She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.
Nope.
no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?
THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.
Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server
DoJ has to charge. FBI can only recommend. DoJ doesn't do anything if it's not race-related.Thank goodness it is not being handled by either political party but is instead being handled by the FBI and Obama's hand-picked man.I really think that this is kind of pointless because neither republicans or democrats want to deal with this issue. You are right that this should be a slam dunk but because of political alliances neither party is going to let Hillary go down but if this happen to be Trump they would both go after him with a vengence. It is a real sad thing in our country when political power has superceded any sense of justice in this country.
True. According to former congressman tom delay the FBI is ready to recommend an indictment, and if the DOJ doesn't put together a grand jury for an indictment then the FBI will go public with all the information they have on hillary. Either way it doesn't look good for hillary.
DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.
“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.
Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
http://nypost.com/2016/01/26/fbi-seeking-indictment-of-hillary-in-email-scandal-tom-delay-claims/
According to a current article written by Jim Hoft for the Gateway Pundit, entitled 'REPORTER: DOJ, FBI “SUPER PISSED OFF” at Obama White House Over Clinton Investigation (Video)', both the DOJ and FBI are 'pissed' at how Obama / the WH (James Earnest) (FALSELY) claimed on Friday Hillary is not the subject / target of the FBI's investigation.
Earnest also said that 'based on what we know now' there would be no indictment of Hillary Clinton.
Speaking of incompetence!
- The FBI has already declared they are investigating Hillary. They are pouring through her e-mails...
- If she wasn't being investigated why would there be a need to say she wouldn't be indicted based on what we know now?
Obama never has been able to keep his nose out of where it doesn't belong. It worjed out well for Holder but not so well for Libs in 2014. We'll see how it pans out for Hillary...
Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...
What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
The article came out yesterday.Wrong.She had training in 08' including with FBI on SAP or whatever. Violations began after those training.
Nope.
no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?
THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.
Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server
In 2010.
Before they were Classified in 2015.
The article came out yesterday.Wrong.Nope.
no one gets the clearance without the training. Unless you are saying she is exempt from that too. Do any laws apply to the Clintons?
THE CONTENT OF THE EMAILS WAS DEEMED TO BE CLASSIFIED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE EMAILS WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: THE EMAILS WERE NOT CLASSIFIED WHEN THEY WERE SENT.
Or to put it another way: RWs ARE SO DESPERATE THEY CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.
Despite What Her Campaign Wants You to Believe, Hillary Clinton Did Send Top Secret Emails on Her Homebrew Server
In 2010.
Before they were Classified in 2015.
"These emails were classified as “special access programs,” according to Politico, which means they were compartmentalized within the top secret designation; even top secret clearance wouldn’t necessarily be enough to get someone access to these communications."
You can't make it go away.
Nitwit 'constitutionalists' on the right obviously have never heard of ex post facto."Math and timelines are meaningless" says the RW.
There you have it, folks.
I'm sure these same people would be perfectly happy if the rules at USMB suddenly changed and they found themselves banned today for something they posted five years ago, or if they ended up in jail under a new local law that charged them for some action they committed five years ago that was legal at the time.
Or they're just so filled with foam-mouthed hatred that their ability to reason is long gone.
DeLay?DoJ has to charge. FBI can only recommend. DoJ doesn't do anything if it's not race-related.
True. According to former congressman tom delay the FBI is ready to recommend an indictment, and if the DOJ doesn't put together a grand jury for an indictment then the FBI will go public with all the information they have on hillary. Either way it doesn't look good for hillary.
DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.
“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.
Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
http://nypost.com/2016/01/26/fbi-seeking-indictment-of-hillary-in-email-scandal-tom-delay-claims/
Washington Times?
Can you come up with more unreliable sources?
I linked the New York Post not Washington times. And there are numerous sources
Washington Times is a rightwing ragThe only thing RW knows how to say when anyone posts anything negative about libs is 'Your source isn't valid' because that's all Obama, Hillary, and Alynski TAUGHT him to say.DeLay?
DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.
“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.
Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
FBI seeking indictment of Hillary in email scandal, Tom DeLay claims | New York Post
Washington Times?
Can you come up with more unreliable sources?
Delay is a convicted criminal
New York Post, and there are numerous reports from other outlets. Google is your friend.
No it just proves liberals will vote for anyone as long as they have a d beside their name. Gruber described you well.
The Washington Post is one of the most honored papers in our country. The Washington Times is a rag with no credibilityWashington Times is a rightwing ragThe only thing RW knows how to say when anyone posts anything negative about libs is 'Your source isn't valid' because that's all Obama, Hillary, and Alynski TAUGHT him to say.DeLay?DeLay then clarified his statement, saying that if the Justice Department does not hand down an indictment, the FBI will revolt.
“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public,” DeLay warned.
Delay, now a Washington Times radio host, went on to say that Hillary will be punished “one way or another.”
FBI seeking indictment of Hillary in email scandal, Tom DeLay claims | New York Post
Washington Times?
Can you come up with more unreliable sources?
Delay is a convicted criminal
and the Washington post is a left wing rag
Hillary is a corrupt lying bitch
whats your point?
It is embarrassing for you to compare the two
Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...
What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
On a level of belch to 100, how sad does it make you the CEC has let you down so much?Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
Bullshit, you have no idea how classified data and security clearances work. If I receive a document containing the locations of every US Navy ship, I would know it was classified whether it was marked or not. If Hillary received a document showing the location of every North Korean rocket launcher, she should have known it was classified whether it was marked or not.
She also had an aid remove classified markings which is in itself a violation of law.
Face it, the bitch is a criminal.
IF the material in question was "NOT MARKED", then what specific crime was committed? Unless or until documents are classified, they are by definition NOT CLASSIFIED.
What specific law was broken and when. Material classified after the fact doe not an illegal action make.
Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.It is also a fact she was / is fully aware of the laws regarding the legal / illegal handling, transportation, storage, and destruction of clasdified information. SHE BROKE THESE LAWS, and her incompetence, ignorance, and intent to bypass them for her own expedience and convenience are no legitimate excuses...
What specific law was broken and when was it broken.
The emails were classified after the fact. No classified data was transmitted by Ms. Clinton.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
On a level of belch to 100, how sad does it make you the CEC has let you down so much?Not being marked means the receiver has no means to tell whether a document is classifiedWhat specific laws? Please look back in this thread, as the specific laws she has broken and the details of how have already been posted.
The emails were NOT CLASSIFIED at the time of transmission and were classified after the fact.
You claim Ms. Clinton broke the law....what specific law and when.
Not being marked does not equal not classified. Have you ever had a security clearance?
That is why they mark documents
Bullshit, you have no idea how classified data and security clearances work. If I receive a document containing the locations of every US Navy ship, I would know it was classified whether it was marked or not. If Hillary received a document showing the location of every North Korean rocket launcher, she should have known it was classified whether it was marked or not.
She also had an aid remove classified markings which is in itself a violation of law.
Face it, the bitch is a criminal.
