C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Those on the desperate right likely understand very well – but this isn't about the truth, it's about conservatives contriving and propagating lies concerning Clinton in the hope those lies are perceived to be 'true.'Bullshit!Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.
Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime'
Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime
Another article was written by a non-partusan rmade the opposite case and cited the specific identical laws both violated.
Again, though, the common thread in all liberal's defense of Hillary seems to be the claim tha - although she went through all the required training, eas tead into TS programs, and is intelligent - She was /is too STUPID to recognize classified information, even information 'so classified no part of it can be released under any circumstances' because it would cause great harm to our national security'.
Maybe she ought to use that in her campaign ads while running for President!
![]()
You are the biggest fucknut I have run into here, and that's saying something.
LISTEN UP: They were not classified at the time.
They were RETROACTIVELY classified and upgraded LATER.
You don't understand this
at
all.
And I think I'll believe what Petreuas' prosecutor has to say - someone who actually knows something about this - than a trolling boy who writes like a teenage girl on the rag.
5 myths about classified information