DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

Thanks for demonstrating the OTHER Liberal tactic to justify Hillary's actions: "B...b...but 'X' did it, too!"

Really?! Criminals, no matter who they might be, need to be arrested and given their day in court. Ever seen the statue of 'Lady Justice'? She wears a BLINDFOLD. Know WHY? Because Justice is SUPPOSED to be blind to race, sex, POLITICAL PARTY, etc... 'supposed to be' being the key words.
 
Meanwhile:
Condoleezza Rice Aides, Colin Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Emails

by Ken Dilanian

State Department officials have determined that classified information was sent to the personal email accounts of former Secretary of State Colin Powell and the senior staff of former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, NBC News has learned.

In an interview with NBC News, Powell challenged the conclusion, saying nothing that went to his personal account was secret. Rice did not initially respond to an interview request.
In a letter to Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy dated Feb. 3, State Department Inspector General Steve Linick said that the State Department has determined that 12 emails examined from State's archives contained national security information now classified "Secret" or "Confidential." The letter was read to NBC News.

Two of the messages were sent to Powell's personal account, and 10 were sent to personal accounts of Rice's senior aides, the letter said
.

Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts


She didn't do it!

She didn't do it!

She didn't do it!

She didn't do it!

THEY DID IT TOOOOO

You fucking Communists are like 4 year olds.

Well, this whole "they did it too" shit shows that Soros has given up on the lie that Hilliary did nothing wrong.
 
I don't think she will because the Party has deemed Hillary their candidate and have no one better than crazy uncle Joe waiting in the wings (Sanders will not get the nomination). The best outcome (and actually fairly likely) is:

You are dealing with the most corrupt administration in history, you must adjust your expectations.

1. The FBI recommends indictment in order to maintain integrity.

Looks likely to happen."

2. The OA refuses to indict because, well, it has no integrity.

Loretta Lynch is a criminal, this is guaranteed.

3. The FBI goes public with its evidence to maintain its independence from the administration.
4. Hillary's campaign implodes from the negative publicity because her poll numbers indicate people would rather sleep naked with a rabid weasel than vote for her.
5. The DNC installs Joe as their candidate because Sanders was always just comedy relief.
6. Joe becomes even bigger comedy relief with a gaff 10 minutes after accepting the "draft Joe" movement.
7. Sanders' supporters and ordinary democrats get ticked off at the blatant lack of justice and Party machinations and democrats lose big.

That would be cool.

Not going to happen.

The FBI will fold after the criminal Obama administration refuses to uphold the law.

My guess at this moment is that Mao Tse Sanders will be the dim nominee.
 
you a bald face liar and we all know it .... read the god damn law ... not anywhere in that law does it say you can't receive classified documents on an private unauthorized server ... not any where in that law ... it only says if it's been hacked or compromised ... the fact that it was never compromise or hacked say she didn't do anything illegal ...
Do you know for a fact that it was not hacked? If you do, how?
the FBI has stated it wasn't ... wishful thinking on your part tells me you have looked up anything on what the law reads ... you just jump on board with the rest of the right wing nuts case for survival ... after all they only reason this is in the news is republicans are scared to death they will lose control of the house and along with the white house ... thats the only reason this is in the press... cloud the voters thinking is the only way republicans can win
So, IOW, you're going to cling to the "It wasn't illegal" defense. Still not hearing from you that what she did was good or smart, and why. Now, will you change your defense if the FBI recommends an indictment?
thereupon she pick this company plate river network was said to be more secure then the government servers ... thats the reason she picked it was it smart not politically because republicans are using it against here implying all the time that its not a secure site ... thats gravy for republicans ... for people who do research look at the law and see she didn't violate any law by doing this will tell you witch hunt ... i would say in this case it wasn't a good choice by going to a private server as for not being smart, can you imagine if any one on the right got ahold of her private emails, it could be a field day for the right ... thats why i said it wasn't a good decision .. as for smart, i would say it was a good decission but not a real smart political one
You say it was a good decision, but that's based on a faulty premise. Platte River Networks was NOT cleared by the DSS to handle classified materials, so your statement that it was "said to be more secure than the government servers" is a non-starter. I've worked in IT for 30 years now, and when someone has access to upgrade and maintain a server, unless someone takes extraordinary steps to specifically block it, they can access the data on that server as well. In my personal experience, I worked for a company that holds a government contract, and I had to get a security clearance because I had access to the data. That was just for healthcare related data, not information on our drone or satellite programs. The admin access plus the company not being cleared to handle classified information tells me that Hillary put classified information at risk, whether through neglect or ignorance. That is NOT a good or smart thing to do. I do applaud you, however, for at least attempting to make the case that it was.

Again, no proof.

Again, no evidence.

Again, lots of words with no proof...no evidence.

You ain't got nothing.
 
Do you know for a fact that it was not hacked? If you do, how?
the FBI has stated it wasn't ... wishful thinking on your part tells me you have looked up anything on what the law reads ... you just jump on board with the rest of the right wing nuts case for survival ... after all they only reason this is in the news is republicans are scared to death they will lose control of the house and along with the white house ... thats the only reason this is in the press... cloud the voters thinking is the only way republicans can win
So, IOW, you're going to cling to the "It wasn't illegal" defense. Still not hearing from you that what she did was good or smart, and why. Now, will you change your defense if the FBI recommends an indictment?
thereupon she pick this company plate river network was said to be more secure then the government servers ... thats the reason she picked it was it smart not politically because republicans are using it against here implying all the time that its not a secure site ... thats gravy for republicans ... for people who do research look at the law and see she didn't violate any law by doing this will tell you witch hunt ... i would say in this case it wasn't a good choice by going to a private server as for not being smart, can you imagine if any one on the right got ahold of her private emails, it could be a field day for the right ... thats why i said it wasn't a good decision .. as for smart, i would say it was a good decission but not a real smart political one
You say it was a good decision, but that's based on a faulty premise. Platte River Networks was NOT cleared by the DSS to handle classified materials, so your statement that it was "said to be more secure than the government servers" is a non-starter. I've worked in IT for 30 years now, and when someone has access to upgrade and maintain a server, unless someone takes extraordinary steps to specifically block it, they can access the data on that server as well. In my personal experience, I worked for a company that holds a government contract, and I had to get a security clearance because I had access to the data. That was just for healthcare related data, not information on our drone or satellite programs. The admin access plus the company not being cleared to handle classified information tells me that Hillary put classified information at risk, whether through neglect or ignorance. That is NOT a good or smart thing to do. I do applaud you, however, for at least attempting to make the case that it was.

So many words, and so much nothing.

No proof.

No evidence.

Nothing from nothing means nothing.

Not possible for secure servers to connect to non-secure servers.

Your trying and your lying.
 
John Kerry said he KNOWS his server was hacked...
- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...5k3lNEzQDACV-fOfnOGiJw&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...iiN_4ExN5muOvSuCNP-2mQ&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

and his was appropriately secured / encrypted. He sent e-mails to Hillary's private server, which was NOT encrypted.

- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wFowA0QS0G3taLQ0XSwEWQ&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

1. Hillary said she never sent / received any classified info.
- Kerry sent some to her.

2. It is highly believed Kerry's system was hacked...and you can bet when our enemies found out she had a private server they went after it.


The reason why the number of devices Hillary used is important is because every single one had to be set up with the same encryption, as per the law, as her govt-issued Blackberry. Why? From the moment her plane touched down anywhere in the world, during her time as Sect of State, operatives (enemy and allied) were using every technique they could to hack into her devices, using equipment monitoring all the various frequencies to tap into phone conversations, trying to intercept e-mails, etc...

Remember how often in the last year we repeatedly heard about the Russians and Chinese hacking into government computers and how millions of Americans' private info had been stolen? You really think they would AVOID trying to go after the Secretary of State's personal server, that was sitting in the bathroom of a small IT company, a server that was not appropriately / adequately secured, as per the law?

:rolleyes:

This is one of those times that even the most partisan Liberal has to use a touch of common sense...

Is she in prison yet? Indicted? Led out of the building in handcuffs?

How long do you plan to wait before you use a touch of common sense?
 
Is she in prison yet? Indicted? Led out of the building in handcuffs?

How long do you plan to wait before you use a touch of common sense?
Does your mommy know you're using the computer again? Quick, run go ask her to explain to you what an 'on-going investigation' means, then crawl back up on the stack of phone books in your chair and rejoin the conversation.

:p
 
Which is it.

Hillary was to dumb to understand she Classified Material on her server(s)?

or

Hillary was smart enough to know she Classified Material on her server(s) and did nothing?

You have no evidence.

You have no proof.

Second and third-hand hearsay not admissible.

The U.S. Government numerous safeguards and firewalls to prevent the passing of, the holding of and/or the transmission of Classified Material from Secure Classified Server(s) to unclassified server(s).

Your pissing in the wind and getting wet.
 
John Kerry said he KNOWS his server was hacked...
- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjC0O2G3d7KAhXMNiYKHcYtDfcQFggfMAA&url=http://twitchy.com/2015/08/11/john-kerry-claims-his-computer-has-been-hacked-chinese-are-very-likely-reading-his-email/&usg=AFQjCNE8tf5p5k3lNEzQDACV-fOfnOGiJw&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjC0O2G3d7KAhXMNiYKHcYtDfcQFggzMAM&url=http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/11/politics/kerry-emails-chinese-russian-hackers/&usg=AFQjCNF-Pq48iiN_4ExN5muOvSuCNP-2mQ&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

and his was appropriately secured / encrypted. He sent e-mails to Hillary's private server, which was NOT encrypted.

- http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiJvvyu3d7KAhXEOiYKHQVaBXQQqQIIIDAA&url=http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/2/john-kerry-sent-hillary-clinton-classified-data-us/&usg=AFQjCNE1GW_8wFowA0QS0G3taLQ0XSwEWQ&bvm=bv.113370389,d.eWE

1. Hillary said she never sent / received any classified info.
- Kerry sent some to her.

2. It is highly believed Kerry's system was hacked...and you can bet when our enemies found out she had a private server they went after it.


The reason why the number of devices Hillary used is important is because every single one had to be set up with the same encryption, as per the law, as her govt-issued Blackberry. Why? From the moment her plane touched down anywhere in the world, during her time as Sect of State, operatives (enemy and allied) were using every technique they could to hack into her devices, using equipment monitoring all the various frequencies to tap into phone conversations, trying to intercept e-mails, etc...

Remember how often in the last year we repeatedly heard about the Russians and Chinese hacking into government computers and how millions of Americans' private info had been stolen? You really think they would AVOID trying to go after the Secretary of State's personal server, that was sitting in the bathroom of a small IT company, a server that was not appropriately / adequately secured, as per the law?

:rolleyes:

This is one of those times that even the most partisan Liberal has to use a touch of common sense...

Is she in prison yet? Indicted? Led out of the building in handcuffs?

How long do you plan to wait before you use a touch of common sense?

Lack of evidence does have a way of preventing an indictment.
 
Last edited:
...what an 'on-going investigation' means...

An ongoing investigation means an adult would post ongoing developments as they occur instead of creaming his underpants because he's absolutely positively convinced, based on nothing but the frothings in his own brain, that something's going to happen ANY MINUTE NOW!!!!!11!

It'll be nice when you reach that stage.
 
Do you know for a fact that it was not hacked? If you do, how?
the FBI has stated it wasn't ... wishful thinking on your part tells me you have looked up anything on what the law reads ... you just jump on board with the rest of the right wing nuts case for survival ... after all they only reason this is in the news is republicans are scared to death they will lose control of the house and along with the white house ... thats the only reason this is in the press... cloud the voters thinking is the only way republicans can win
So, IOW, you're going to cling to the "It wasn't illegal" defense. Still not hearing from you that what she did was good or smart, and why. Now, will you change your defense if the FBI recommends an indictment?
thereupon she pick this company plate river network was said to be more secure then the government servers ... thats the reason she picked it was it smart not politically because republicans are using it against here implying all the time that its not a secure site ... thats gravy for republicans ... for people who do research look at the law and see she didn't violate any law by doing this will tell you witch hunt ... i would say in this case it wasn't a good choice by going to a private server as for not being smart, can you imagine if any one on the right got ahold of her private emails, it could be a field day for the right ... thats why i said it wasn't a good decision .. as for smart, i would say it was a good decission but not a real smart political one
You say it was a good decision, but that's based on a faulty premise. Platte River Networks was NOT cleared by the DSS to handle classified materials, so your statement that it was "said to be more secure than the government servers" is a non-starter. I've worked in IT for 30 years now, and when someone has access to upgrade and maintain a server, unless someone takes extraordinary steps to specifically block it, they can access the data on that server as well. In my personal experience, I worked for a company that holds a government contract, and I had to get a security clearance because I had access to the data. That was just for healthcare related data, not information on our drone or satellite programs. The admin access plus the company not being cleared to handle classified information tells me that Hillary put classified information at risk, whether through neglect or ignorance. That is NOT a good or smart thing to do. I do applaud you, however, for at least attempting to make the case that it was.

Again, no proof.

Again, no evidence.

Again, lots of words with no proof...no evidence.

You ain't got nothing.
Are you trying to make the case that her using a private server was a good thing to do? Because if you are, you're not doing a very good job.
 
And in a nut shell is the problem. There is no evidence. The so called "Investigation" seems to be, in the words of "A Dead Shark." Not moving and sinking.

The evidence is not there.

Lots of words, but no proof.
 
Ruh-Roh Goopers you may need "More Benghazi"

Condoleezza Rice Aides, Colin Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Emails
Source: NBC News

State Department officials have determined that classified information was sent to the personal email accounts of former Secretary of State Colin Powell and the senior staff of former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, NBC News has learned.

In an interview with NBC News, Powell challenged the conclusion, saying nothing that went to his personal account was secret. Rice did not initially respond to an interview request.

In a letter to Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy dated Feb. 3, State Department Inspector General Steve Linick said that the State Department has determined that 12 emails examined from State's archives contained national security information now classified "Secret" or "Confidential." The letter was read to NBC News.

Two of the messages were sent to Powell's personal account, and 10 were sent to personal accounts of Rice's senior aides, the letter said.


Read more: Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts
 
the FBI has stated it wasn't ... wishful thinking on your part tells me you have looked up anything on what the law reads ... you just jump on board with the rest of the right wing nuts case for survival ... after all they only reason this is in the news is republicans are scared to death they will lose control of the house and along with the white house ... thats the only reason this is in the press... cloud the voters thinking is the only way republicans can win
So, IOW, you're going to cling to the "It wasn't illegal" defense. Still not hearing from you that what she did was good or smart, and why. Now, will you change your defense if the FBI recommends an indictment?
thereupon she pick this company plate river network was said to be more secure then the government servers ... thats the reason she picked it was it smart not politically because republicans are using it against here implying all the time that its not a secure site ... thats gravy for republicans ... for people who do research look at the law and see she didn't violate any law by doing this will tell you witch hunt ... i would say in this case it wasn't a good choice by going to a private server as for not being smart, can you imagine if any one on the right got ahold of her private emails, it could be a field day for the right ... thats why i said it wasn't a good decision .. as for smart, i would say it was a good decission but not a real smart political one
You say it was a good decision, but that's based on a faulty premise. Platte River Networks was NOT cleared by the DSS to handle classified materials, so your statement that it was "said to be more secure than the government servers" is a non-starter. I've worked in IT for 30 years now, and when someone has access to upgrade and maintain a server, unless someone takes extraordinary steps to specifically block it, they can access the data on that server as well. In my personal experience, I worked for a company that holds a government contract, and I had to get a security clearance because I had access to the data. That was just for healthcare related data, not information on our drone or satellite programs. The admin access plus the company not being cleared to handle classified information tells me that Hillary put classified information at risk, whether through neglect or ignorance. That is NOT a good or smart thing to do. I do applaud you, however, for at least attempting to make the case that it was.

Again, no proof.

Again, no evidence.

Again, lots of words with no proof...no evidence.

You ain't got nothing.
Are you trying to make the case that her using a private server was a good thing to do? Because if you are, you're not doing a very good job.

No, and of course you missed that.

There is no means. There is no mechanism by which Classified/Secure Material including Emails held on a U.S. Government Secure(s) can transferred to, held on or pass along to a non-secure Server(s). Could not and Would not happen. You ignore that.

You claim Ms. Clinton knew she was holding, storing or passing Classified/Secure Material, which Ms. Clinton would have known to be a violation of Federal Law regarding the handling and securing of classified/secure material. But you offer no proof to support it.

You claim Ms. Clinton ignored Federal Law, but have no real evidence to support your claim.

Your attempt to use Second and Third Hand Hearsay fails.

You continue to fail at providing your proof.

You have nothing.
 
And in a nut shell is the problem. There is no evidence. The so called "Investigation" seems to be, in the words of "A Dead Shark." Not moving and sinking.

The evidence is not there.

Lots of words, but no proof.


upload_2016-2-4_13-22-14.jpeg


LOL; stupid fucking Communists....
 
And in a nut shell is the problem. There is no evidence. The so called "Investigation" seems to be, in the words of "A Dead Shark." Not moving and sinking.

The evidence is not there.

Lots of words, but no proof.
Are you in the FBI? Or just trying to jerk our chains?
 
"The intelligence community has now deemed some of Hillary Clinton’s emails “too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances, according to a U.S. government official close to the ongoing review. A second source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, backed up the finding. "

"Na na na na
Na na na na
Hey, Hey, Hey
GOOD-BYE!"

Go to jail. Go DIRECTLY to Jail. Do NOT pass 'Go'. Do NOT collect $200. Do NOT Win the DNC Nomination. Do NOT continue Campaigning. Do NOT get put on the ballot. DO go down as the 1st 1st Lady to Go to Jail for NUMEROUS Felonies - crimes under the ESPIONAGE Act and for CORRUPTION Charges!

------

Selling Russia 1/5th of the US uranium Stockpile.

Caught and stopped TRYING to sell the Russians several of the Aleutian Islands & their mineral rights.

Caught taking contributions from foreign millionaire whose company she protected from legal punishment for violating Iranian Sanctions - running illegal goods to Iran - WHILE she served as Secretary of State ('Corruption'/'Influence Peddling)

Taking millions from Islamic nations that finance and support terrorism.

Taking millions from Islamic nations that oppress women, engage in female genital mutilation, and who murder homosexuals.

Hiring an AL QAEIDA-associated Militia to protect a US Ambassador.

Abandoning a US Ambassador in a hostile environment amidst terrorist threats that forced EVERY other nation with people in Benghazi to pull them out.

REJECTING OVER 600 pleas for additional security from the on-site US Ambassador AND TAKING AWAY 14 members of the Ambassador's security detail in the midst of these threats, a call for his assassination, AND after 2 previous terror attacks on his compound, the last of which before his murder left a 4-foot hole in his compound wall.

Denying UNDER OATH she knew what happened that night, ONLY to have HER OWN E-MAILS expose she told the Turkish Ambassador after the 13-hour attack that resulted in 4 Americans dead that she KNEW the video had nothing to do with the attack, that this was a terrorist attack; revealed that she told her own daughter that this was a terrorist attack; then told the world and the grieving families it was all about a video...thern ended up calling the grieving families 'Liars'!

Broke the law by not signing the required legal document, upon getting her security clearance required to do the job as Secretary of State, stating she had received her classification training.

Violated Administration rules and the law by not providing copies of ALL State Dept-related documents and e-mails to the State Dept for required recording/holding. The State Dept made it clear Hillary did NOT turn over all documents AS SHE CLAIMED UNDER OATH TO HAVE DONE.

Lied under oath about not using a legal private server, using MULTIPLE electronic devices (not just 'one'), and about NOT sending / receiving classified information. She later changed her statement to cover ass by saying she had not sent/received an e-mails / documents MARKED classified.
-- Since then the FBI has evidence that Hillary ordered subordinates to strip the classification markings off documents and to send them vis UNCLASS means for the sake of 'ease' and 'expedience'. These workers have stated this was not a 1-time thing but was almost 'SOP'! Thatm btw, is a CRIME.

Illegal handling, storage, and attempted destruction of Classified / EXTREMELY classified information capable of seriously damaging our national security.
- The company handling her server, which illegally had different / multiple classifications of information on 1 server (illegal) - did not have the appropriate legal clearance to hold/store/handle the classified information.
- Her lawyer was walking around with a USB drive that contained highly classified information without a security clearance, violating laws regarding handling, transporting, and storage of classified information.

Hillary broke the law by not signing the Federal Document stating she had released / returned all security documents and that she was keeping none of them (according to one report), which is a crime. If she DID sign the document, in light of all the classified State Dept-related information found in her position, she broke the law for keeping all this classified information.
-- Once you quit/step down/leave a job/program dealing with COMPARTMENTALIZED Highly Classified information the business/organization 'READS YOU OUT' of the program. From that point on it is ILLEGAL for you to have access to the information let alone have any of it in your possession!!!! The FBI just confirmed Hillary has / had compartmentalized Highly Classified info in her possession...ILLEGALLY.

(If they wanted to press it and make the case, considering her dealings with Russia and taking money from Islamic countries and others - such as the guy she 'helped' violate US Sanctions on Iran, a case of possible TREASON / REAL 'ESPIONAGE' could me made. (Not that it would stick, but it could be made...)

NOW the FBI is reporting that the information Hillary has / had in her possession was / is SO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED AND DANGEROUS TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY that they CAN'T even REDACT it enough to release ANY of it!

HOLY CR@P! Stick a fork in her. SHE IS DONE! There is NO WAY the DOJ and / or Obama could possibly refuse to call for a Grand Jury / agree to indict her! Doing so to protect Ex-Atty General Eric Holder for multiple counts of Felony Perjury while attempting to keep Obama's 'Fast and Furious' scandal buried was easy to pull off because his criminal acts did not rise to the level of being capable of 'seriously causing damage to our national security'! Hillary, though? She'll be lucky if ALL they charge her with is 'NEGLIGENCE' under the Esionage Act!

No matter how red you make the font, or how BIG it is, Clinton broke no law and isn't under investigation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top