Dr. Anthony Fauci has indeed violated the Hippocratic Oath

[Flopper]

As Fauci said to the Senate, he gives advice on public health, not economics. He was not hire to give the president advice on the economy.

Unfortunately, our beloved Dr. Fauci’s advice, and silence in some cases, has set the stage for his patient, the American People, to suffer and endure enormous harm, which he has brazenly attempted to justify by repeatedly saying he doesn’t give economic advice. And yet, his very oath requires him to take cognizance of economic problems which predictable may result from his advice.

A Modern Version of the Hippocratic Oath requires a doctor “… that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.”

So, tell us, how many deaths have resulted from the medicine prescribed by Dr. Fauci?

What about Dr. Fauci advising elective medical procedures like mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests, to come to a halt, how many early detected cancers have gone unnoticed? And how many scheduled dental cleanings were suspended, because of his advice, during which time more early cancers could have been detected?

And what about suicides as a result of his advice to shut down businesses, i.e., those owners who have lost everything they worked for because of Fauci's irrational advice?

From statistics, available to Fauci, sound reasoning indicates that focusing on and protecting those with underlying medical conditions which make them more susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus, would be a logical course of action, since the remaining portion of the population would not suffer significant casualties if it practiced common sense hygiene.

Your love affair with Fauce is misplaced, at least when one applies common sense and logic.

JWK

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

As Fauci said to the Senate, he gives advice on public health, not economics. He was not hire to give the president advice on the economy.

Unfortunately, our beloved Dr. Fauci’s advice, and silence in some cases, has set the stage for his patient, the American People, to suffer and endure enormous harm, which he has brazenly attempted to justify by repeatedly saying he doesn’t give economic advice. And yet, his very oath requires him to take cognizance of economic problems which predictable may result from his advice.

A Modern Version of the Hippocratic Oath requires a doctor “… that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.”

So, tell us, how many deaths have resulted from the medicine prescribed by Dr. Fauci?

What about Dr. Fauci advising elective medical procedures like mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests, to come to a halt, how many early detected cancers have gone unnoticed? And how many scheduled dental cleanings were suspended, because of his advice, during which time more early cancers could have been detected?

And what about suicides as a result of his advice to shut down businesses, i.e., those owners who have lost everything they worked for because of Fauci's irrational advice?

From statistics, available to Fauci, sound reasoning indicates that focusing on and protecting those with underlying medical conditions which make them more susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus, would be a logical course of action, since the remaining portion of the population would not suffer significant casualties if it practiced common sense hygiene.

Your love affair with Fauce is misplaced, at least when one applies common sense and logic.

JWK

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

Coronavirus Cases in Georgia, Florida Continue to Decline Despite Business Openings

Some states engaged in reopening their economies have not yet seen coronavirus outbreaks feared by health officials.In particular, Georgia and Florida, which were projected to see a sharp rise in new cases, have not experienced major new outbreaks in the past week. The average number of new...

news.yahoo.com

 

[johnwk]

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes. And the medicine he prescribed, which you seem to support and requires our nation’s entire population, with a few exceptions, to “shelter in place” and close down our economy, was not only totally illogical when considering the existing evidence ___ that the vast majority of deaths from the Coronavirus were the elderly and those who had one or more underlying health conditions ___ but the remedy this charlatan has conned the United States into adopting, has caused more harm, death and destruction, to the United States than the leadership of both political parties have caused over the past several decades. Why you defend this snake oil salesman’s remedy is beyond human comprehension!


As early as February, it was known that the vast majority of deaths from the virus was limited to the elderly, and especially those having underlying medial conditions. Common sense dictated the most vulnerable ought to have been isolated from the least vulnerable while allowing normal activities to continue with enhanced hygiene precautions for covid-19. Instead, this con artist created a nationwide hysteria and offered a totally illogical remedy which has wrecked the lives the American People, caused undue deaths and suicides, deaths from drug use, and countless other miseries across the country.

The bottom line is, 90% of the deaths from the virus is limited to the elderly and especially those having underlying medical problems. Isolating and protecting, as best as possible, this vulnerable segment of society, while allowing the rest of the nation's population to carry on their daily business, was the most obvious course of action so as to cause as little harm to the patient, which just happens to be the American people.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

JWK

 

[johnwk]

As Fauci said to the Senate, he gives advice on public health, not economics. He was not hire to give the president advice on the economy.

Unfortunately, our beloved Dr. Fauci’s advice, and silence in some cases, has set the stage for his patient, the American People, to suffer and endure enormous harm, which he has brazenly attempted to justify by repeatedly saying he doesn’t give economic advice. And yet, his very oath requires him to take cognizance of economic problems which predictable may result from his advice.

A Modern Version of the Hippocratic Oath requires a doctor “… that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.”

So, tell us, how many deaths have resulted from the medicine prescribed by Dr. Fauci?

What about Dr. Fauci advising elective medical procedures like mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests, to come to a halt, how many early detected cancers have gone unnoticed? And how many scheduled dental cleanings were suspended, because of his advice, during which time more early cancers could have been detected?

And what about suicides as a result of his advice to shut down businesses, i.e., those owners who have lost everything they worked for because of Fauci's irrational advice?

From statistics, available to Fauci, sound reasoning indicates that focusing on and protecting those with underlying medical conditions which make them more susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus, would be a logical course of action, since the remaining portion of the population would not suffer significant casualties if it practiced common sense hygiene.

Your love affair with Fauce is misplaced, at least when one applies common sense and logic.

JWK

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

Coronavirus Cases in Georgia, Florida Continue to Decline Despite Business Openings

Some states engaged in reopening their economies have not yet seen coronavirus outbreaks feared by health officials.In particular, Georgia and Florida, which were projected to see a sharp rise in new cases, have not experienced major new outbreaks in the past week. The average number of new...

news.yahoo.com

One of the reasons Florida did not have the predicted outbreak numbers is because, unlike Communist New York, Florida focused on the most vulnerable, especially those in nursing homes, and which counted for over 30% of New York's deaths due to the virus. Commie Cuomo actually ordered nursing homes to admit virus carriers!


April 23, 2020

"Thursday, Governor Cuomo announced an investigation of the 600-plus nursing homes across New York.

“They get paid to provide a service. They get regulated by the state government. There are certain rules and regulations that they must follow and we put in additional rules and regulations on nursing homes in the midst of this crisis,” said Cuomo.

One of those emergency rules has arguably made operating a nursing home harder during a very difficult time. A March 25th health department directive states nursing homes cannot deny “readmission or admission sole based on a confirmed or suspected diagnosis of COVID-19”.



See: Cuomo: Nursing homes 'don’t have the right to object' to order requiring admission of COVID-19 patients


JWK

 

[Olde Europe]

Your medicine and cure is worse than the disease. You seem to be defending Dr. Fauci, snake oil salesman and con artist.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes.

It's only because the White House was following - belatedly, and inconsistently - Dr. Fauci's advice, the spread was curtailed, and the damage caused by it was significantly reduced, you can whine about the economic consequences. Without that, we'd be observing a collapsing and collapsed healthcare system, and an unspeakable death toll.

Other than that, Dr. Fauci does not prescribe medicine, and neither does he treat a patient. He merely advises this White House how best to control the pandemic. That's his only role as a world-class epidemiologist and infectious disease specialist.

Your subservient whining and blame-shifting on behalf of your Dear Leader under the threadbare disguise of the inapplicable Hippocratic oath is noted. As is, unfortunately, your effort to discredit, also in line with your Dear Leader's propaganda efforts, a scientist and science your Dear Leader finds inconvenient. It's shameful, as is lying and smearing in general.

 

[johnwk]

Your medicine and cure is worse than the disease. You seem to be defending Dr. Fauci, snake oil salesman and con artist.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes.

It's only because the White House was following - belatedly, and inconsistently - Dr. Fauci's advice, the spread was curtailed, and the damage caused by it was significantly reduced, you can whine about the economic consequences. Without that, we'd be observing a collapsing and collapsed healthcare system, and an unspeakable death toll.

Other than that, Dr. Fauci does not prescribe medicine, and neither does he treat a patient. He merely advises this White House how best to control the pandemic. That's his only role as a world-class epidemiologist and infectious disease specialist.

Your subservient whining and blame-shifting on behalf of your Dear Leader under the threadbare disguise of the inapplicable Hippocratic oath is noted. As is, unfortunately, your effort to discredit, also in line with your Dear Leader's propaganda efforts, a scientist and science your Dear Leader finds inconvenient. It's shameful, as is lying and smearing in general.

So, instead of actually addressing what I said, you obfuscate, misdirect and exhibit your hatred for the president and likewise display your Trump Derangement Syndrome .


JWK

 

[Flopper]

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes. And the medicine he prescribed, which you seem to support and requires our nation’s entire population, with a few exceptions, to “shelter in place” and close down our economy, was not only totally illogical when considering the existing evidence ___ that the vast majority of deaths from the Coronavirus were the elderly and those who had one or more underlying health conditions ___ but the remedy this charlatan has conned the United States into adopting, has caused more harm, death and destruction, to the United States than the leadership of both political parties have caused over the past several decades. Why you defend this snake oil salesman’s remedy is beyond human comprehension!


As early as February, it was known that the vast majority of deaths from the virus was limited to the elderly, and especially those having underlying medial conditions. Common sense dictated the most vulnerable ought to have been isolated from the least vulnerable while allowing normal activities to continue with enhanced hygiene precautions for covid-19. Instead, this con artist created a nationwide hysteria and offered a totally illogical remedy which has wrecked the lives the American People, caused undue deaths and suicides, deaths from drug use, and countless other miseries across the country.

The bottom line is, 90% of the deaths from the virus is limited to the elderly and especially those having underlying medical problems. Isolating and protecting, as best as possible, this vulnerable segment of society, while allowing the rest of the nation's population to carry on their daily business, was the most obvious course of action so as to cause as little harm to the patient, which just happens to be the American people.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

JWK

Mortality rate for persons over 65 (50.5 million people) who have covid 19 is 80% without considering prexisting conditions. So just how do you protect 50 million people from the virus while opening up the country? Keep in mind 10 million have jobs. Without social distancing and wearing masks, the virus will spread like wildfire to those under and over 65.

In regard to Dr Fauci, he is not prescribing any medicine nor any economic solution. In fact, he has never said we should not open or close businesses. He has just provide an opinion based on the data that clearly indicates we should move very cautiously. This of course has pissed off Trump who clearly favors opening up the country regardless of the the health and safety considerations. Obviously, he wants Fauci and Brix to endorse his statements on opening up the country and wisely they have abstained because if they do, Trump will blame them for the spread of the virus and resulting deaths just as he blames the Chinese for his lack of a response to the virus in the US.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes. And the medicine he prescribed, which you seem to support and requires our nation’s entire population, with a few exceptions, to “shelter in place” and close down our economy, was not only totally illogical when considering the existing evidence ___ that the vast majority of deaths from the Coronavirus were the elderly and those who had one or more underlying health conditions ___ but the remedy this charlatan has conned the United States into adopting, has caused more harm, death and destruction, to the United States than the leadership of both political parties have caused over the past several decades. Why you defend this snake oil salesman’s remedy is beyond human comprehension!


As early as February, it was known that the vast majority of deaths from the virus was limited to the elderly, and especially those having underlying medial conditions. Common sense dictated the most vulnerable ought to have been isolated from the least vulnerable while allowing normal activities to continue with enhanced hygiene precautions for covid-19. Instead, this con artist created a nationwide hysteria and offered a totally illogical remedy which has wrecked the lives the American People, caused undue deaths and suicides, deaths from drug use, and countless other miseries across the country.

The bottom line is, 90% of the deaths from the virus is limited to the elderly and especially those having underlying medical problems. Isolating and protecting, as best as possible, this vulnerable segment of society, while allowing the rest of the nation's population to carry on their daily business, was the most obvious course of action so as to cause as little harm to the patient, which just happens to be the American people.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

JWK

Mortality rate for persons over 65 (50.5 million people) who have covid 19 is 80% without considering prexisting conditions. So just how do you protect 50 million people from the virus while opening up the country? Keep in mind 10 million have jobs. Without social distancing and wearing masks, the virus will spread like wildfire to those under and over 65.

In regard to Dr Fauci, he is not prescribing any medicine nor any economic solution. In fact, he has never said we should not open or close businesses. He has just provide an opinion based on the data that clearly indicates we should move very cautiously. This of course has pissed off Trump who clearly favors opening up the country regardless of the the health and safety considerations. Obviously, he wants Fauci and Brix to endorse his statements on opening up the country and wisely they have abstained because if they do, Trump will blame them for the spread of the virus and resulting deaths just as he blames the Chinese for his lack of a response to the virus in the US.

What’s the rate considering preexisting conditions? What’s the source for your mortality stat?

 

[johnwk]

So just how do you protect 50 million people from the virus while opening up the country?

Considering the well-known fact that the elderly, and especially those with underlying medical conditions, are the most susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus, I suspect this identifiable group would exercise self-sheltering at home, and precautionary measures to avoid the deadly effects of the virus. If not, they would risk the consequences.

Self-preservation is a more powerful motivating force then me attempting to impose what I think is best for this group.

 

[johnwk]

What’s the rate considering preexisting conditions? What’s the source for your mortality stat?

Coronavirus, diabetes, obesity and other underlying conditions: Which patients are most at risk?

According to a CDC report, nearly 90% of patients hospitalized with coronavirus (COVID-19) had one or more underlying health conditions.

Karina Zaiets, and Ramon Padilla, USA TODAY Updated 11:18 a.m. CDT Apr. 15, 2020





Most NYC Virus Deaths Were Among People With Other Health Ills



Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

March 1, 2020

Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

Most deaths from corona virus appear to have other health conditions

90 percent of victims who died from covid-19 had underlying health conditions

 

[skye]

F ....Fauci

he is scum and part of the Deep State.

 

[skye]

Fauci will have to face HIS CREATOR.... he will have to pay big time.

I don't feel sorry for him.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What’s the rate considering preexisting conditions? What’s the source for your mortality stat?

Coronavirus, diabetes, obesity and other underlying conditions: Which patients are most at risk?

According to a CDC report, nearly 90% of patients hospitalized with coronavirus (COVID-19) had one or more underlying health conditions.

Karina Zaiets, and Ramon Padilla, USA TODAY Updated 11:18 a.m. CDT Apr. 15, 2020





Most NYC Virus Deaths Were Among People With Other Health Ills



Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

March 1, 2020

Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

Most deaths from corona virus appear to have other health conditions

90 percent of victims who died from covid-19 had underlying health conditions

I’m aware. My question to Flopper the left wing shill was rhetorical.
Plus, his post was about not considering underlying conditions. I don’t know if that was a gaffe or just stupidity.
He was just trying to make it sound like everyone over 65 is gonna die from Wuhan disease.

 

[Baron]

Part of the Classic Version of the Hippocratic Oath commands a doctor to

“ … apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.”

A Modern Version of the Hippocratic Oath requires a doctor “… that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.”

And in the ancient Hippocratic Oath which physicians took, they are instructed, “Prima non nocere” — above all else, don’t harm the patient!

Unfortunately, our beloved Dr. Fauci’s advice, and silence in some cases, has set the stage for his patient, the American People, to suffer and endure enormous harm, which he has brazenly attempted to justify by repeatedly saying he doesn’t give economic advice. And yet, his very oath requires him to take cognizance of economic problems which may predictable result from his advice.

And what was Fauci’s advice? See: 'I don't understand why' every state hasn't issued stay-at-home orders

In addition he told the American People:

"Please, put off, cancel elective medical and surgical procedures. You don't want to not ever do them, but for the time being, don't do them. Because they also not only consume personal protective equipment, they may also consume some of the things like ventilators that they might need,” NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci said. LINK

So tell us Dr. Fauci, by advising elective medical procedures like mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests, to come to a halt, how many early detected cancers have gone unnoticed. And how many scheduled dental cleanings were suspended, because of your advice, during which time early cancer could have been detected?

And what about the increase in suicides, drug overdose deaths and domestic violence which has resulted from your advice to enforce a shelter in place order . . . has your advice not resulted in predictable and various forms of harm to the patient?

Had you actually paid attention to your Oath, Dr. Fauci, your advice would have been far different than a stay at home order. You would have advised that those most susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus should be contained by a stay at home order and cared for, while those less susceptible ought to practice enhanced protective measures i.e., masks, distancing, handwashing, etc. Indeed, this advice would not have allowed the devastating harm that your advice has inflicted on the patient, and it would have allowed heard immunity to build up while scientific research could produce treatments, vaccines, and test detections. But instead, you choose to ignore your Oath and recommended a medicine far worse than the disease. And for that you should be shunned and ignored henceforth.

JWK

Most of modern 'doctors' are criminals you should keep away from.Your body is a money making machine for them.

 

[Aletheia4u]

They have the right to worship the way they want.

Hippocratic Oath - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of health deities - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Discovery of Penicillin—New Insights After More Than 75 Years of Clinical Use

Discovery of Penicillin

wwwnc.cdc.gov

Here’s a list of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s HIV patents! | SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary

stateofthenation.co

 

[Aletheia4u]

Bobby Kennedy Jr. Claims Dr. Fauci and Gates Foundation Will Make Billions on Coronavirus Vaccine | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Bobby Kennedy Jr., the son of the late former US Attorney General and the nephew of the late President John F.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Flopper]

As I said, he is the president's healthcare advisor. It is not his place to weight the economic consequences of keeping the country closed or open. His job is to advise the president as to the likely healthcare outcomes. In fact, he would be an utter fool to advise the president to open up the country when medical data is telling him other wise.

As far the number of deaths due to keeping the country closed, that falls primarily in the realm of conjecture. What is not conjecture is 88,000 deaths in 10 weeks and there is nothing to indicate that the number will not rise significantly as many precautions are dropped.

I appreciate your opinion but the fact is, Fauci, as a doctor, is required to take into consideration the predictable side effects of the medicine he prescribes. And the medicine he prescribed, which you seem to support and requires our nation’s entire population, with a few exceptions, to “shelter in place” and close down our economy, was not only totally illogical when considering the existing evidence ___ that the vast majority of deaths from the Coronavirus were the elderly and those who had one or more underlying health conditions ___ but the remedy this charlatan has conned the United States into adopting, has caused more harm, death and destruction, to the United States than the leadership of both political parties have caused over the past several decades. Why you defend this snake oil salesman’s remedy is beyond human comprehension!


As early as February, it was known that the vast majority of deaths from the virus was limited to the elderly, and especially those having underlying medial conditions. Common sense dictated the most vulnerable ought to have been isolated from the least vulnerable while allowing normal activities to continue with enhanced hygiene precautions for covid-19. Instead, this con artist created a nationwide hysteria and offered a totally illogical remedy which has wrecked the lives the American People, caused undue deaths and suicides, deaths from drug use, and countless other miseries across the country.

The bottom line is, 90% of the deaths from the virus is limited to the elderly and especially those having underlying medical problems. Isolating and protecting, as best as possible, this vulnerable segment of society, while allowing the rest of the nation's population to carry on their daily business, was the most obvious course of action so as to cause as little harm to the patient, which just happens to be the American people.

Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

JWK

Mortality rate for persons over 65 (50.5 million people) who have covid 19 is 80% without considering prexisting conditions. So just how do you protect 50 million people from the virus while opening up the country? Keep in mind 10 million have jobs. Without social distancing and wearing masks, the virus will spread like wildfire to those under and over 65.

In regard to Dr Fauci, he is not prescribing any medicine nor any economic solution. In fact, he has never said we should not open or close businesses. He has just provide an opinion based on the data that clearly indicates we should move very cautiously. This of course has pissed off Trump who clearly favors opening up the country regardless of the the health and safety considerations. Obviously, he wants Fauci and Brix to endorse his statements on opening up the country and wisely they have abstained because if they do, Trump will blame them for the spread of the virus and resulting deaths just as he blames the Chinese for his lack of a response to the virus in the US.

What’s the rate considering preexisting conditions? What’s the source for your mortality stat?

I have not found the rate for over 65 and prexisting conditions. I saw something similar but it included the Flu, Pneumonia, and Covid 19

80% of US coronavirus deaths have been among people 65 and older, a new CDC report says — here's what it reveals about the US cases

COVID-19 deaths, ICU trips, and hospitalization rates are all higher among older Americans, according to the CDC.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[Flopper]

So just how do you protect 50 million people from the virus while opening up the country?

Considering the well-known fact that the elderly, and especially those with underlying medical conditions, are the most susceptible to the deadly effects of the virus, I suspect this identifiable group would exercise self-sheltering at home, and precautionary measures to avoid the deadly effects of the virus. If not, they would risk the consequences.

Self-preservation is a more powerful motivating force then me attempting to impose what I think is best for this group.

A lot of us over 65 (10 million) have to work and we are dependent on others to wear masks and keeping their distance. The same holds true for millions of others that don't have the luxury of being able to stay home. We have to help family members, get medical tests, see doctors, dentist, and many other things that part our lives. Our defense against the disease lies as much with others as it does ourselves.

There's going to be many millions of people that are going to be non-participants in a number of sectors of our economy once it's open. Sporting events, concerts, movies, plays, fairs, parades, conventions, large brick an mortar stores, etc. are not going to see large participation for years.

 

[johnwk]

F ....Fauci

he is scum and part of the Deep State.

It’s not a “Deep State”. It’s a subversive socialist/communist “Shadow Government” which began to entrench itself during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Its mission being, to advance GLOBALIST and socialist policies, and obstruct attempts to roll back such policies.


JWK

 

[johnwk]

What’s the rate considering preexisting conditions? What’s the source for your mortality stat?

Coronavirus, diabetes, obesity and other underlying conditions: Which patients are most at risk?

According to a CDC report, nearly 90% of patients hospitalized with coronavirus (COVID-19) had one or more underlying health conditions.

Karina Zaiets, and Ramon Padilla, USA TODAY Updated 11:18 a.m. CDT Apr. 15, 2020





Most NYC Virus Deaths Were Among People With Other Health Ills



Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

March 1, 2020

Coronavirus: who is most at risk of dying?

Most deaths from corona virus appear to have other health conditions

90 percent of victims who died from covid-19 had underlying health conditions

I’m aware. My question to Flopper the left wing shill was rhetorical.
Plus, his post was about not considering underlying conditions. I don’t know if that was a gaffe or just stupidity.
He was just trying to make it sound like everyone over 65 is gonna die from Wuhan disease.

Sorry for misunderstanding you. Aside from that, the most vulnerable to the deadly effects of the vires, i.e., the elderly, and more specifically, are those who have underlying medical conditions such as such as heart disease, diabetes, chronic lung disease, etc.

JWK