Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's curious is the left insisting that the reason the kid isn't getting the drug is an inability to pay. The real reason is that the drug hasn't been approved and it's illegal to let the child take it.
WRONG
compassionate reasons exist.
they have given it free in the past.
they stopped siting money
Chimerex refuses to allow Josh Hardy, 7, access to life-saving Brincidofovir medicine | Mail Online This would not happen if the CORRECT kind of government controlled things like this...
Fortunately we have caused so much uproar over this he is getting the help he needs.
https://www.facebook.com/SaveJoshHardy
Chimerex CEO Kenneth Moch told Fox News that the company made the decision two years ago to stop the compassionate use program, saying they 'cannot afford it' anymore.
'As we progressed to larger and more complex safety trials, we made the decision two years ago to stop the program and focus resources on earning FDA approval,' Moch said.
Moch says that saying yes to Josh would mean saying yes to many more patients, draining the company's resources and delaying the time it will take for the drug to progress through the formal studies required before it can be given FDA approval and help many more future patients.
However, the company received $72 million in federal funding to develop Brincidofovir
Read more: Chimerex refuses to allow Josh Hardy, 7, access to life-saving Brincidofovir medicine | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
facts
maybe we should take the damn company from them
Drug company: Ailing 7-year-old Josh Hardy will get medicine - CNN.com
So a two year old decision has been reversed a few days after the request was made
Oh the evil corp and horror
In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.maybe we should take the damn company from them
and you say the right wants to destroy the country?.....great attitude TM ....did you not say that you were a landlord and owned a building or two?.....what if some family needed a place to live but they could not pay rent and you said hey i have bills to pay i cant afford to let you stay for free.....should they take your building away from you?...
In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.maybe we should take the damn company from them
and you say the right wants to destroy the country?.....great attitude TM ....did you not say that you were a landlord and owned a building or two?.....what if some family needed a place to live but they could not pay rent and you said hey i have bills to pay i cant afford to let you stay for free.....should they take your building away from you?...
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.maybe we should take the damn company from them
and you say the right wants to destroy the country?.....great attitude TM ....did you not say that you were a landlord and owned a building or two?.....what if some family needed a place to live but they could not pay rent and you said hey i have bills to pay i cant afford to let you stay for free.....should they take your building away from you?...
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
Chimerex refuses to allow Josh Hardy, 7, access to life-saving Brincidofovir medicine | Mail Online This would not happen if the CORRECT kind of government controlled things like this...
Fortunately we have caused so much uproar over this he is getting the help he needs.
https://www.facebook.com/SaveJoshHardy
Chimerex refuses to allow Josh Hardy, 7, access to life-saving Brincidofovir medicine | Mail Online This would not happen if the CORRECT kind of government controlled things like this...
Fortunately we have caused so much uproar over this he is getting the help he needs.
https://www.facebook.com/SaveJoshHardy
Sibelius.
They MUST? Really? How so?In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.and you say the right wants to destroy the country?.....great attitude TM ....did you not say that you were a landlord and owned a building or two?.....what if some family needed a place to live but they could not pay rent and you said hey i have bills to pay i cant afford to let you stay for free.....should they take your building away from you?...
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
Not when their property is used to harm others. They MUST use that property to help others not for profit but because its the right thing to do.
They MUST? Really? How so?In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
Not when their property is used to harm others. They MUST use that property to help others not for profit but because its the right thing to do.
In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.and you say the right wants to destroy the country?.....great attitude TM ....did you not say that you were a landlord and owned a building or two?.....what if some family needed a place to live but they could not pay rent and you said hey i have bills to pay i cant afford to let you stay for free.....should they take your building away from you?...
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
Not when their property is used to harm others. They MUST use that property to help others not for profit but because its the right thing to do.
What IS correct? Chavez? Hitler? Stalin? just WHAT government are you portending to speak for? Do you know ANYTHING of Liberty, voluntary CHARITY?They MUST? Really? How so?Not when their property is used to harm others. They MUST use that property to help others not for profit but because its the right thing to do.
In this current government of course not. In a CORRECT kind of government absolutely.
Precisely. This guy is a FAN of Dictatorship(s).In the statist world of hers? YES. The property is only yours because the Gubmint is gracious enough to let you have it...but watch your step...or else.
The left has no concept of private property, or private property rights .
Not when their property is used to harm others. They MUST use that property to help others not for profit but because its the right thing to do.
HUH?
Oh wait, you are on record as stating " I am first of all a retarded man, only then a socialist".
Go fig.
.
Looks like it was taken care of by Organizing a Community. Who'da thunk that works?
Corporations don't have hearts, by law. See Dodge v Ford.Pay to play my little Nazi. You want the drug, then pay up. A drug company isn't a charity.
Chimerex refuses to allow Josh Hardy, 7, access to life-saving Brincidofovir medicine | Mail Online This would not happen if the CORRECT kind of government controlled things like this...
Fortunately we have caused so much uproar over this he is getting the help he needs.
https://www.facebook.com/SaveJoshHardy
You fucking moron don't even know the issue here. It's the FDA hasn't approved the drug yet, but they previously were allowed to administer it via compassionate uses. HOWEVER, the government makes that use expense and burdensome. The FDA approval process is long, costly, burdensome, filled without unnecessary red tape, waste and unnecessary delays. If the FDA approved it, this kids would have been able to obtain the drug easily. Since the FDA has not yet, it's costly and burdensome to go the non-approved route.
NEVERTHELESS, the company CEO and executives that made the decision to deny compassionate use because it is too costly is just heartless and well WRONG. Esp in this case. Thank god it went viral and thank god the company is finally doing the right thing!
ZERO respect for private property.Looks like it was taken care of by Organizing a Community. Who'da thunk that works?
conservatives.
your fellow libs mentioned forcing the company to give the drug or just take the company over.
Guess 70+ million wasn't enough eh?
ALWAYS with other people's money. Again? These people are getting pretty brazen and arrogant.Guess 70+ million wasn't enough eh?
No one is stopping you from writing the kid a check for $70 million. What are you, greedy or something?
