Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved

longknife

Diamond Member
Sep 21, 2012
42,221
13,093
2,250
Sin City
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP

AUSTIN, TX -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.

What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.
 
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP

AUSTIN, TX -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.

What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.

It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.
 
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP

AUSTIN, TX -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.

What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.

It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.

No it isn't. There isn't a government job on the planet that doesn't require drug screenings. If people want others to support them then it's only fair they do it free of drugs.
 
It is not at all unconstitutional.

But it is whackaloon crazy corporate welfare that is a logical next step past Obamacare and absolute government intervention into the lifestyles of citizens.

And on a malignantly malfeasant Clown Court where a chief justice casts votes effectively giving corporations the rights of natural born citizens and coercing citizens to purchase corporate services not wanted under penalties of law, there is zero chance of a ruling for natural born citizens' rights.
 
Last edited:
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP

AUSTIN, TX -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.

What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.

It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.

WTF does personal privacy have to do with it?

Someone wants to apply for a government program and the government wishes to establish their eligibility for it. The person signs the application freely.

How is that too difficult to understand?

[I said ACLU types would try to overturn this, didn't I?]
 
Here's the bottom line. The cost of drug testing will make any self respecting fiscal conservative puke. One four screen test (THC, Opiates, Cocaine, Meth) cost $11 (it did in 2005, the year I retired) and requires a chain of custody to meet due process laws. I think the lawmakers in Texas are lunatics.
 
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP



What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.

It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.

WTF does personal privacy have to do with it?

Someone wants to apply for a government program and the government wishes to establish their eligibility for it. The person signs the application freely.

How is that too difficult to understand?

[I said ACLU types would try to overturn this, didn't I?]

It's none of the government's business what chemicals a person voluntarily puts in their body.

If a person worked, they have a right to their unemployment benefits no matter what. They already earned them.
 
Saturday, May 25, 2013 AP

AUSTIN, TX -- Workers who lose their jobs would have to clear a drug screening to qualify for unemployment compensation under a proposal approved by the Texas Legislature.

Under current law, employers take out insurance policies to help laid-off workers survive on weekly payments of $62 to $440. Those who are fired for cause, including failing an employer-sponsored drug test, do not qualify.

What a great idea. Read more @ Drug tests for unemployment benefits approved by Texas Legislature | abc13.com and watch how quickly the left attacks it.

It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.

Welfare is a violation of the constitution yet it keeps growing and growing and growing....

However, you're correct. One bad policy should not allow another bad policy to exist.
 
It's a pretty clear violation of privacy.

Texas is a state controlled by twisted fascists.

It's one of the worst places in the U.S. to live.

WTF does personal privacy have to do with it?

Someone wants to apply for a government program and the government wishes to establish their eligibility for it. The person signs the application freely.

How is that too difficult to understand?

[I said ACLU types would try to overturn this, didn't I?]

It's none of the government's business what chemicals a person voluntarily puts in their body.

If a person worked, they have a right to their unemployment benefits no matter what. They already earned them.

The issue with UE is that bad far, the vast and I do mean vast majority of people collecting UE never put even close into it as to what they receive out of it. Currently people can be on UE for 2 years, and that's not even getting into other forms of welfare they can be on.
 
Only idiots fail to pick the right answers on a questionnaire. And I'm betting the state is shouldering the cost of testing.

Yes, past the privacy issue, the cost would be huge. Get rid of both imo, but that would be less Government.... Instead we get more government while less Government gets the blame for more Governments failures.
 
Drug testing is done as a condition for employment in many places random drug testing is done even after your employed but somehow drug testing for unemployment benefits or welfare benefits is unfair that's off the charts silly.
 
"The Legislative Budget Board, a nonpartisan state agency, estimates it will cost a half-million dollars to set up the program for drug testing workers seeking unemployment benefits. It will cost an additional $168,000 a year to run the program, according to the board's analysts.
The Workforce Commission told the board's analysts that the program could save the Unemployment Trust Fund $13.7 million over five years."

Read more here: Davis opposes drug tests for unemployed | State | News from Fort Worth, Dallas, Arlingto...


I'm suspicious of these promises to save tax dollars in the end. It assumes that the cost of benefits not paid out will be substantially more than the cost of testing, and we know how well assumptions can work out.
 
Drug testing is done as a condition for employment in many places random drug testing is done even after your employed but somehow drug testing for unemployment benefits or welfare benefits is unfair that's off the charts silly.

The difference is one is privet and one is Government. Welfare as we do it today is in fact immoral and illegal, and because of that it does not work... To remedy the failures of welfare (UE) more laws that cost to much and are unconstitutional should not be used as the answer.

Now if a state wants to offer it's own UE welfare system and requires a state run (paid for) drug test, go ahead.
 
"The Legislative Budget Board, a nonpartisan state agency, estimates it will cost a half-million dollars to set up the program for drug testing workers seeking unemployment benefits. It will cost an additional $168,000 a year to run the program, according to the board's analysts.
The Workforce Commission told the board's analysts that the program could save the Unemployment Trust Fund $13.7 million over five years."

Read more here: Davis opposes drug tests for unemployed | State | News from Fort Worth, Dallas, Arlingto...


I'm suspicious of these promises to save tax dollars in the end. It assumes that the cost of benefits not paid out will be substantially more than the cost of testing, and we know how well assumptions can work out.

168k a year is like 2 Government jobs.... That "estimate" is off by millions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top