Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

[Doc7505]

No.

That’s easy.

I’m in the informed minority. Some dip shits think this is about hacking.

~~~~~~
You're right it's about power. ideology and sedition.

 

[colfax_m]

What specifically is inaccurate about the statement below please?

Durham said in the court filing that lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a tech company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower and the Trump White House in an effort to establish a “narrative” linking President Donald Trump to Russia.



“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

There was no infiltration of any server. You placed the word “infiltrate” in quotes. It’s a lie. The word does not appear in the filing.

Nowhere does he say any of the information was obtained illegally.

 

[colfax_m]

~~~~~~
You're right it's about power. ideology and sedition.

Make the case for sedition. How could this possibly be called such a crime?

 

[lennypartiv]

We do need to know, what Clinton knew, and when she knew it, moreover, who within the Obama White House, she communicated this too...

You know Hillary is going to get away with this. The Deep State will protect her.

 

[struth]

You know Hillary is going to get away with this. The Deep State will protect her.

Frankly, I really don't care about putting her in prison....I am more concerned with who in the Obam White House she conspired with on this....folks in power that allowed this to happen.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

There was no infiltration of any server. You placed the word “infiltrate” in quotes. It’s a lie. The word does not appear in the filing.

Nowhere does he say any of the information was obtained illegally.

This to you sounds legal:

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states.

 

[colfax_m]

This to you sounds legal:

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states.

Yes. This was data he had access too. He didn’t steal it. He didn’t break into it.

What part says it was illegal?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

There was no infiltration of any server. You placed the word “infiltrate” in quotes. It’s a lie. The word does not appear in the filing.

Nowhere does he say any of the information was obtained illegally.

So is the NY Post lying then? Yes or no?

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio noted Special Counsel John Durham alleged in Friday’s legal filing that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an Internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and the White House to try to tie Donald Trump to Russia.

Rep. Jordan: Durham filing shows Trump was right about being spied on

Rep. Jim Jordan noted Special Counsel John Durham alleged that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an Internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and t…

nypost.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Yes. This was data he had access too. He didn’t steal it. He didn’t break into it.

What part says it was illegal?

If it is non-public/proprietary and you take it, that is illegal. What are you talking about?

 

[imawhosure]

This to you sounds legal:

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing states.

The Left is just playing semantics as always.

The real question is and should be asked------------->if some sort of illegality was not suspected, why are they investigating it? Doing it for fun I suppose-)

 

[colfax_m]

So is the NY Post lying then? Yes or no?

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio noted Special Counsel John Durham alleged in Friday’s legal filing that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an Internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and the White House to try to tie Donald Trump to Russia.

Rep. Jordan: Durham filing shows Trump was right about being spied on

Rep. Jim Jordan noted Special Counsel John Durham alleged that Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign paid an Internet company to “infiltrate” servers at Trump Tower and t…

nypost.com

I’d hesitate to call what the NY Post does journalism. Mostly because they don’t fact check things. They put up a quote from Jim Jordan about “infiltrating” and don’t bother to see if it’s true.

You shouldn’t believe such biased media.

Look in the court filing and see if you can figure out where they said infiltrate. They don’t.

 

[Doc7505]

There was no infiltration of any server. You placed the word “infiltrate” in quotes. It’s a lie. The word does not appear in the filing.

Nowhere does he say any of the information was obtained illegally.

~~~~~~

Durham Exposes New Links To Clinton Campaign in Creation of Russian Collusion Scandal

Below is my column in The Hill on the recent links established by Special Prosecutor John Durham and the Clinton campaign. Here is the column:

jonathanturley.org

**********​

Tom Fitton: Sedition in the Obama Oval Office? - Judicial Watch

From Tom Fitton’s Op-Ed from Breitbart: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and their top intelligence officers huddled in the Oval Office shortly before Donald Trump was inaugurated to discuss what they would do about this new President they despised. Now we aim to find out more about this conspiracy. We...

www.judicialwatch.org

**********​

John Durham Filing Suggests Clinton Operatives Spied on Trump in 2016 and in White House

John Durham alleged that Hillary Clinton's political allies paid a contractor to spy on Trump -- both as a candidate, and as president.

www.breitbart.com

**********​

Fresh proof the Russiagate ‘scandal’ was created by the Hillary Clinton campaign

A federal grand jury handed up an indictment requested by special counsel John Durham — and it’s fresh proof that the entire Russiagate “scandal” was manufactured by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.…

nypost.com

**********​

The More Clinton Aides Durham Indicts, The More Questions Arise

Many are wondering how far up Durham will prove the corruption went, and who he will prove knowingly engaged in propagating it.

amac.us

 

[colfax_m]

If it is non-public/proprietary and you take it, that is illegal. What are you talking about?

You sure it’s illegal?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I’d hesitate to call what the NY Post does journalism. Mostly because they don’t fact check things. They put up a quote from Jim Jordan about “infiltrating” and don’t bother to see if it’s true.

You shouldn’t believe such biased media.

Look in the court filing and see if you can figure out where they said infiltrate. They don’t.

So you're saying they are lying. If the report comes out and it states "infiltrate" will you come back and admit you were wrong? Yes or No?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You sure it’s illegal?

If I hack your private data would you call it legal? Yes or no?

Thanks

 

[colfax_m]

So you're saying they are lying. If the report comes out and it states "infiltrate" will you come back and admit you were wrong? Yes or No?

This is a story about a court filing that is already released dipshit.

 

[colfax_m]

If I hack your private data would you call it legal? Yes or no?

Thanks

There was no hacking. Your own quote said he had access to it.

God you’re a moron.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This is a story about a court filing that is already released dipshit.

I asked a question. Answer it please. No need for insults. Be civil.

 

[j-mac]

Yes. This was data he had access too. He didn’t steal it. He didn’t break into it.

What part says it was illegal?

Well, there are no charges as of yet, but I wouldn't be hanging my hat on that if I were you...At some point there will be...

Now, just think of it, if it were revealed that currently the Trump campaign were spying on Biden as we speak...You people would be losing your minds...

 

[Doc7505]

Make the case for sedition. How could this possibly be called such a crime?

It's defined as a coup d' etat.