bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,169
- 47,315
- 2,180
Nope.Oh look,a lie you made up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope.Oh look,a lie you made up
Sorry turd, but you don't get to assume that a swindle was actually free and fair.My standard is the actual count, the recount, the hand count, the forensic audits, and the electoral count.
Along with EVERY court case on the topic of voter fraud in 2020. Along with Trump's own Department of Justice, which found no evidence of fraud sufficient to overturn the election.
And Trump's own Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees.....which found this to be the most secure election in American history.
Your standard....is the My Pillow Guy.
Our sources are not equal.
Show us the evidence that every vote counted past 2 AM on November 4th, 2020......was fraudulent. You can't. Its a story you repeat to yourself, but it lacks evidence to support.
Which might explain your perfect record of failure in court.
Sorry turd, but you don't get to assume that a swindle was actually free and fair.
That's all you've done.
You checked a swindle.Or...I've checked the actual election results rather than your imagination.
Its been a year. Show us the evidence that every vote counted past 2 AM on November 4th, 2020......was fraudulent.
You're still stuck at square one, clinging to a story you can't factually establish.
You've got me beat by a year.I’ve lived Domain Name Service since 1996.
You checked a swindle.
Who do you think you're fooling.
It most definitely has notnobody said the outcome is determined solely by the VP, but the Consitution does make him the President of the Senate, and Congress has made a law allowing him to reject certain votes and not certify them.
Making impossible demands is a Dim election swindle specialty.Says you, citing your imagination. While I have the actual election results.
Our sources are not equal. Now show us the evidence that every vote counted after 2AM on November 4th was fraudulent.
You're stalling because you have no such evidence. Nor ever have.
Only if you count all those dead people voting Democrat.
So you showing us evidence that every vote cast after 2AM on November 4th is 'impossible', huh?Making impossible demands is a Dim election swindle specialty.
Hillary has two daughters?Let's make sure we got this straight,
I give a donation to Donald Trump and I get doxxed , I give to Canadian Truckers and my bank puts a hold on my funds and I get labeled a insurrectionist but Hillary Clinton , her husband and her attractive daughter can put servers in Americas White House to spy on a president , they can also steal billion$ from the Haitian relief fund , lose $20 billion from the coffers of the State Dept while she's in charge and entertain the peodofiles in high places with their good buddy Jeff Epstein and the CIA , The FBI and the DOJ sit back and won't do a damned thing about a very obvious problem .
Nah ,there's no reason in the world for anyone to start getting devious and to take things into their own hands .
Plan .Plan.Plan and follow through because they aren't going to do what's needed
It most definitely has not
Yep. And you have no evidence to back the lie. You don't even remember what a lie is anymore.Nope.
Yep. Anyone have no evidence to back the lie. You don't even remember what a lie is anymore.
There was no hack. Who told you this?
Wrong again, there are no allegations or charges of that in Durham's filing.
Nowhere in that does it talk about accessing a database or hard drive.I could agree that the characterization of "hack" could be a semantic overstatement for the Executive Office of the President since Joffe / Neustar had full access to the EOP dedicated servers because of Neustar's DNS resolution contract. . . . But, there was other data spoken of in Durham's filing besides DNS traffic and what besides "hacking" explains any data interception or exfiltration from the health care company or Trump Tower or Trump Central Park West?
View attachment 601928
That is some seriously contrived way of pronouncing BULLSHIT.I could agree that the characterization of "hack" could be a semantic overstatement
You're lying, Stumpy. Nothing in that legal document states that was the reason Hillary hired them.
No there wasn't.But, there was other data spoken of in Durham's filing